They're coming for our birth control

[raison de arizona]

They aren't even hiding it anymore, they are coming for our birth control.

Trump suck up Senator Marsha Blackburn just called the Supreme Court decision Griswold v. Connecticut - “constitutionally unsound” - That is the 1965 Supreme Court ruling that legalized birth control.

What do you say to her?

Best comment wins:

[MN-Skeptic]

Next thing you know they'll be saying that the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote is unconstitutional!

[Suranis]

I'd say that one person will say anything to get into the Newspapers and get people clicking on her.

And, just one person saying something is not a "They" coming for anything. Call me when a number of people greater than zero say they agree with her.

And before anyone says anything about me saying that as a foul Catholic, I've actually read Humanae Vitae, and Birth control is alcoved in cases of Medical need. Yes, I know that "reading it" is more than some Catholics have done, but hey...

https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/ ... vitae.html

Lawful Therapeutic Means

15. On the other hand, the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result there from—provided such impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever. (19)

(19) See Pius XII, Address to 26th Congress of Italian Association of Urology: AAS 45 (1953), 674-675; to Society of Hematology: AAS 50 (1958), 734-735 [TPS VI, 394-395].

In addition, I have said on the forum before that I don't actually agree with the Church blanket ban on Birth control and think its incomparable with the Church teaching for responsible family sizes.

So, I guess that showed you, huh?

[raison de arizona]

This is hardly the first time I've heard this, nor is it the only person who has espoused it. I'm not going to go hunting for other examples at this time, but I suspect plenty will organically appear in the coming months.

ETA: except this that I just randomly ran across

[sugar magnolia]

This is hardly the first time I've heard this, nor is it the only person who has espoused it. I'm not going to go hunting for other examples at this time, but I suspect plenty will organically appear in the coming months.

But some guy in some other country with some other opinion who has read some stuff disagrees with you, so you're obviously wrong and Blackburn is the only one who has ever said it.

[raison de arizona]

now that I'm actively not looking for it, it's all over my twitter feed

This week, Governor Youngkin refused to sign a bill to protect access to contraception. Instead, he gutted the bill’s protections for IUDs, birth control, and emergency contraceptives.

As the next Governor of Virginia, I will defend the right to contraception for all Virginians.

[Slim Cognito]

Yeah, tell me again how it’s God‘s will that women conceive year after Year, free from medical or pharmaceutical interference but as soon as ED enters the picture, Viagra is a must-have and God‘s will is immediately forgotten.

(And I’m not knocking Viagra. Just noting the hypocrisy.)

[zekeb]

Yeah, tell me again how it’s God‘s will that women conceive year after Year, free from medical or pharmaceutical interference but as soon as ED enters the picture, Viagra is a must-have and God‘s will is immediately forgotten.

(And I’m not knocking Viagra. Just noting the hypocrisy.)

In 1864, when Arizona wrote that bill, 325 children out of 1000 did not live to age 5. That's how God handled birth control.

[raison de arizona]

I know I said I wouldn't do this, but they keep popping up.

Q: Everything going on with Roe right now, they’re saying you’re coming after gay marriage and birth control next?

Trump-endorsed candidate: Sex ought to be between one man and one woman in the confines of marriage. Birth control should not be legal