#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
- Luke
- Posts: 6051
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
- Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Wow, Christine Scott is really motivated. But Bob, I think I see the problem -- Christine's brief is ONLY 982 pages. If it really had been 1000 everything would have been different. She sure spent time on it, flipped through some quickly and doesn't seem to be copypasta. And her request is so reasonable.
Here's a new DENINED for the Fogbow Files:
Here's a new DENINED for the Fogbow Files:
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow
s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
- Ben-Prime
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
- Location: Worldwide Availability
- Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
- Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
I mean, in fairness, I don't think Ramaswamy *can* say anything of substance, ever. I believe he is congenitally and, indeed, constitutionally unable to do so.
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.
- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.
- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
I accidentally overwrote my prior post about Christine Scott.
But:
There's no indication so far that Scott has cured these deficiencies.
![Bag :bag:](./images/smilies/bag.gif)
Stopped-clock Tracy Beanz had noticed the clerk kicked back a deficiency letter:"For completeness": In re Christine Scott, 11th Cir. Case No. 23-13411, filed Oct. 17, 2023.
There's no indication so far that Scott has cured these deficiencies.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Raland filed his reply in the 10th Circuit:
Now we wait for the inevitable affirmance.
If Raland is lucky, the 10th will deny and then SCOTUS will deny before the 2024 election.
Executive summary of the reply: "Mah First Amendment!"![Yawn :yawn:](./images/smilies/smiley_yawn.gif)
Raland also included an unauthorized, irrelevant, unintentionally hilarious affidavit: You apparently violate the U.S. Constitution whenever you disagree with Raland J. Brunson.
Now we wait for the inevitable affirmance.
If Raland is lucky, the 10th will deny and then SCOTUS will deny before the 2024 election.
Executive summary of the reply: "Mah First Amendment!"
![Yawn :yawn:](./images/smilies/smiley_yawn.gif)
Raland also included an unauthorized, irrelevant, unintentionally hilarious affidavit: You apparently violate the U.S. Constitution whenever you disagree with Raland J. Brunson.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
- northland10
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Somebody also just recently ran the docket and docs on Pacer so they show up in CourtListener (not sure why we get the 10th and not some other circuits on CourtListener).bob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:16 pm Raland filed his reply in the 10th Circuit:
Now we wait for the inevitable affirmance.
If Raland is lucky, the 10th will deny and then SCOTUS will deny before the 2024 election.
Executive summary of the reply: "Mah First Amendment!"
Raland also included an unauthorized, irrelevant, unintentionally hilarious affidavit: You apparently violate the U.S. Constitution whenever you disagree with Raland J. Brunson.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67 ... sotomayor/
Raland does need to pay attention to his cut and paste. From his reply brief: He, or maybe the court, fixed the 10th case number but the trial court case is his first one, well sort of since that one was 1:21-CV-00111. The case he is appealing now is 1:23-CV-00042. He has Orly-like attention to detail.
101010 ![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Raland is a busy boy. He has been trying to be a pretend attorney for Paul-Kenneth: House of Cromar too. Judge isn't allowing it.
Mean Judge won't let Paul-Kenneth: House of Cromar use pretend attorneys. 1 of them is Ammon Bundy's former campaign manager and another is 1 of the Brunson Bros. Jail can read their mail and listen to calls even if he now calls them "assistants of counsel".
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
It hasn't hit CourtListener yet, but 10th affirmed the dismissal of Raland Brunson's suit against three SCOTUS justices.
Onto SCOTUS for one last grift.
Onto SCOTUS for one last grift.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
I'm shocked!!
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/secr.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/meetup.gif)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
- northland10
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
I just checked the 10th Circuit website yesterday. I guess I was almost correct in the timing.
Here it is from the 10th
https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1 ... 997600.pdf
101010 ![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
If Raland moves quickly, he could get his cert. denial by June.northland10 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:02 pmI just checked the 10th Circuit website yesterday. I guess I was almost correct in the timing.
But the pro-girft move would be to slow walk the cert. petition, so that the denial won't drop until October.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
- Luke
- Posts: 6051
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
- Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Me too also! We dodged a bullet. But another SCOTUS Grand Slam may be coming so we're not out of the woods yet!!
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow
s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Raland still trying to be a pretend lawyer for Paul-Kenneth: House of Cromar. He is going to subpoena himself. This is from a motion for continuance that Raland wrote last week but was filed by Kenny - they both signed it.
- northland10
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Oooh wow, may have a NEW SCOTUS case . This is BREAKING!!!
I hope they remember to say the same thing next month. Their marks don't need to know that they have until early May to file their writ petition.
I hope they remember to say the same thing next month. Their marks don't need to know that they have until early May to file their writ petition.
101010 ![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
This is giving me some CPAC vibes: Taitz, Zullo, Gallups, etc., would suggest that they were invited, but really they just bought a ticket like every other rube.
Tickets start at $1000 per person for this Lake event, so I doubt any of the Brunson marks will be attending.
Bonus:
... and Puppet Show.SPECIAL GUESTS
ROSEANNE BARR
JIM BREUER
COLBY COVINGTON
CHAD PRATHER
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
- Volkonski
- Posts: 12209
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
- Verified: ✅
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Since today is April 1st I checked. Apparently that is real.
Please join us at Mar-a-Lago for an evening
of fun and laughs with
KARI LAKE
CANDIDATE FOR THE U.S. SENATE, ARIZONA
along with Special Guest comedians
ROSEANNE BARR
JIM BRUER
CHAD PRATHER
They are sure to inspire and lift us with patriotism and humor!
KARI LAKE RECEPTION
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2024
5:30 -7:30 PM
THE MAR-A-LAGO CLUB
PARTICIPATION LEVELS:
SEA LEVEL EXPERIENCE | $100,000 PER COUPLE
2-night stay at Mar-A-Lago, private dinner at Mar-A-Lago following reception with Kari Lake and special guest, photo with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), golf for 2 at Trump International Golf Course, and private cocktail reception
LAKE LEVEL EXPERIENCE | $50,000 PER COUPLE
Private Dinner at Mar-A-Lago following reception with Kari Lake and special guest, photo with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), and private cocktail reception
CANYON CO-CHAIR | $25,000 PER COUPLE
Picture with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), and private cocktail reception
COPPER CO-HOST | $13.200 PER COUPLE
Picture with Kari Lake & special guest, autographed book, and private cocktail reception
SEDONA SPONSOR | $6.600 PER COUPLE
Autographed book and private cocktail reception
ATTENDEE | $1,000 PER PERSON
FOR QUESTIONS, OR TO RSVP, CONTACT CAROLINE WREN AT CAROLINE@KARILAKE.COM OR 512-771-9915
TO CONTRIBUTE BY CHECK, PLEASE MAKE PAYABLE TO
KARI LAKE VICTORY FUND
4040 E CAMELBACK #103
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
- RTH10260
- Posts: 16318
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
"plans to speak if he is available, FYI."
IFF he is not in jail![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
IFF he is not in jail
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
- Slim Cognito
- Posts: 7156
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
- Location: Too close to trump
- Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
- Verified: ✅
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Or sundowning big-time.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/meetup.gif)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
- Sam the Centipede
- Posts: 2154
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Well, I guess at that price I could be persuaded to go, maybe.Volkonski wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:27 pm Since today is April 1st I checked. Apparently that is real.
Please join us at Mar-a-Lago for an evening of fun and laughs with
KARI LAKE RECEPTION
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2024
5:30 -7:30 PM
THE MAR-A-LAGO CLUB
PARTICIPATION LEVELS:
SEA LEVEL EXPERIENCE | $100,000 PER COUPLE
2-night stay at Mar-A-Lago, private dinner at Mar-A-Lago following reception with Kari Lake and special guest, photo with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), golf for 2 at Trump International Golf Course, and private cocktail reception![]()
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
![Can't Look :cantlook:](./images/smilies/idontwanttosee.gif)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
What the heck is a "Private Yacht Experience" and why does Kari need a "special guest" to provide it?
Hic sunt dracones
- RTH10260
- Posts: 16318
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Isn't Bannon a part time owner of a superyacht ? ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Raland's cert. petition (Case No. 23-1073) hit SCOTUS' docket.northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:51 pm Oooh wow, may have a NEW SCOTUS case . This is BREAKING!!!
(Waiver of) Response due May, 2, 2024. Raland should have his denial before the end of this term. (And, if the past is prologue, denial of rehearing petition over the summer.)
The only question is whether SCOTUS will outright deny or whether at least four justices recuse themselves. (If at least four justices recuse, there's no quorum, which is an automatic denial.)
I presume the three justices named as defendants will recuse. I would not be surprised if all nine recused.
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/boots_orly.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/met_obot.png)
![Image](https://thefogbow.com/forum/images/awards/reporter.png)
- northland10
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
I just checked earlier today. Bob beats me by being belated.bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:56 pmRaland's cert. petition (Case No. 23-1073) hit SCOTUS' docket.northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:51 pm Oooh wow, may have a NEW SCOTUS case . This is BREAKING!!!
(Waiver of) Response due May, 2, 2024. Raland should have his denial before the end of this term. (And, if the past is prologue, denial of rehearing petition over the summer.)
The only question is whether SCOTUS will outright deny or whether at least four justices recuse themselves. (If at least four justices recuse, there's no quorum, which is an automatic denial.)
I presume the three justices named as defendants will recuse. I would not be surprised if all nine recused.
They have not posted the petition yet so I cannot see their brilliance. I'm sooooooo sad.
![Yawn :yawn:](./images/smilies/smiley_yawn.gif)
101010 ![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)
![Towel :towel:](./images/smilies/f_towel.gif)