INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Scavino? I doubt it. Few of these flunkies ever go against the mighty former guy.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- Volkonski
- Posts: 12455
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
- Verified: ✅
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Tanya Chutkan, the judge overseeing Trump's federal election interference case, appears to be victim of 'swatting'
Police and fire trucks responded to reports of a shooting at Chutkan's home, but police determined no shooting had taken place.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna132856
Police and fire trucks responded to reports of a shooting at Chutkan's home, but police determined no shooting had taken place.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna132856
Police confirmed to NBC News that they responded to false reports of a shooting at a house that a witness identified as Chutkan's home. A law enforcement official also confirmed that it was Chutkan’s home and that she was home when police arrived at her residence.
A police report obtained by NBC News said that officers with the Metropolitan Police Department responded to a call just after 10 p.m. ET that referenced a shooting that occurred at the location. Once authorities arrived at the scene, an unnamed subject said she "was not injured and that there was no one in her home."
Police "determined no shooting took place," a police spokesperson told NBC News. It's unclear from where or from whom the call to emergency services originated.
Chutkan is the federal judge overseeing the federal election interference case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against Trump. She appeared to be the victim of "swatting," which happens when someone makes a false report of a crime in progress to draw police to a certain location.
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
- poplove
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
- Location: Las Vegas NV
- Occupation: ukulele ambassador
- Verified: ✅💚💙💜☮️💐🌈⚽️🥥🌴✅
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Special counsel Jack Smith was targeted by attempted swatting on Christmas Day
Police were dispatched toward Smith's residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna132964
Police were dispatched toward Smith's residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna132964
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7952
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
He goads the deplorables into the dirty work.
- Slim Cognito
- Posts: 7431
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
- Location: The eff away from trump.
- Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
- Verified: ✅
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
And he didn’t get all over the Xitter machine to cry about it?
May the bridges I burn light my way.
x5
x5
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Or hold a presser?Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Mon Jan 08, 2024 10:57 pm And he didn’t get all over the Xitter machine to cry about it?
He’s doing it All Wrong.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
LIstening to DC Circuit eviscerating TFG's lawyer. Took about 8 minutes.
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/li ... c.-circuit
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/li ... c.-circuit
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
15 minutes in: TFG lawyer now raising his voice about the horrors of an incumbent pres prosecuting his political rival.
Audience of 1.
Wow.
Audience of 1.
Wow.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
@Brandi_Buchman live-tweeting (just recording what's being said, v little commentary)
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
DC Circuit pointing out that during Impeachment #2, TFG argued that he didn't need to be impeached because he could be prosecuted after
NB. Sauer has been arguing for 20 minutes the exact opposite.
NB. Sauer has been arguing for 20 minutes the exact opposite.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
"hypothetical jurisdiction" under discussion.
Been hearing a lot about this lately, as the perfect solution to the "no juristiction" but "need to be heard on the merits" dilemma.
Been hearing a lot about this lately, as the perfect solution to the "no juristiction" but "need to be heard on the merits" dilemma.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
In his rebuttal, Sauer again brings up "political opponent leading in every poll."
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Republicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump wrote: This is INSANE.
Judge: “I asked you a yes or no question. Could a president who ordered S.E.A.L. Team 6 to assassinate a political rival….would he be subject to criminal prosecution?"
Trump's attorney: only if he’s impeached and convicted.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- Volkonski
- Posts: 12455
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
- Verified: ✅
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Appeals court judges skeptical of Trump's immunity appeal in election interference case
The judges also questioned the attorneys about whether they should even render a decision on his claim of immunity and instead allow the case to move forward in the trial court.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna132281
The judges also questioned the attorneys about whether they should even render a decision on his claim of immunity and instead allow the case to move forward in the trial court.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna132281
Federal appeals court judges on Tuesday questioned former President Donald Trump broad claim of immunity from prosecution for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election that resulted in a chain of events that culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
The all-woman three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said nothing to suggest they would embrace Trump's immunity argument, although they raised several options on how they could rule.
The court could issue a ruling that decisively resolves the immunity question, allowing the trial to move quickly forward, or alight on a more narrow ruling that could leave some issues unresolved. They could also simply rule that Trump had no right to bring an appeal at this stage of the litigation.
Trump arrived at the federal courthouse in Washington, D.C., a few minutes before oral arguments began at 9:30 a.m. and sat at his lawyers' table. He was mostly muted during his lawyers’ presentation but grew flustered at points when the prosecution's lawyer was speaking. He could be seen passing notes to his lawyers on a yellow legal pad.
Special counsel Jack Smith was also present at the hearing, which lasted for a little over an hour.
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
- Sam the Centipede
- Posts: 2206
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm
-
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:12 am
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Nasty women post coming in 3, 2, 1…Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:33 pmIt's always a joy to read that phrase knowing Trump's misogynist leanings"
- Sam the Centipede
- Posts: 2206
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
For a moment I thought you meant a nasty women post from me or you! Ah, no, we're too lovely, the OSG. Somebody who follows Pravda Social might flag it up to us.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
So far he is just pontificating about immunity and hasn't posted to Truth regarding it yet, but I'll keep an eye out.Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:56 pmFor a moment I thought you meant a nasty women post from me or you! Ah, no, we're too lovely, the OSG. Somebody who follows Pravda Social might flag it up to us.
Aaron Rupar @atrupar wrote: "I feel that as a president you have to have immunity" -- Trump
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Moron. Did he not just get finished arguing that the president has full immunity?
Acyn @Acyn wrote: Lauro: Joe Biden could be prosecuted from trying to stop this man from becoming the next president of the United States.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Is it just me, or are they twisting themselves into pretzels why tfg has immunity but Biden doesn't have immunity?
I saw the courtroom sketches on CNN. Walt Nauta was there in his shadow like always. Also heard on CNN that the room they used for the press thingie was in his old DC hotel, now Waldorf Astoria I think.
I saw the courtroom sketches on CNN. Walt Nauta was there in his shadow like always. Also heard on CNN that the room they used for the press thingie was in his old DC hotel, now Waldorf Astoria I think.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
I just laughed when I heard that. Fan* service.
*Just one fan.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Wasn't this point addressed in one of the Federalist Papers?raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:10 amRepublicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump wrote: This is INSANE.
Judge: “I asked you a yes or no question. Could a president who ordered S.E.A.L. Team 6 to assassinate a political rival….would he be subject to criminal prosecution?"
Trump's attorney: only if he’s impeached and convicted.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
who were these women appointed by?Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:33 pmIt's always a joy to read that phrase knowing Trump's misogynist leanings"