P&E: Obama’s Birth Certificate Returns…But Why Now?:
I didn't have Zullo on today's bingo card, but his "answer" to the headline's question is just the same ole same ole recycledOn December 31, 2023, seemingly out of nowhere, finance author Zach De Gregorio, founder of the subscription website WolvesandFinance.com, released a 26-minute video and blog post raising the question, “Whatever happened to Obama’s birth certificate?”
* * *
To The Post & Email’s knowledge, De Gregorio is a newcomer to the subject of Obama’s birth certificate. A self-identified accountant, a brief perusal of his YouTube channel shows he has produced 419 videos over a period of months on political issues garnering between 4,200 and 246,000 views each. As of publication time late Friday afternoon, the “birth certificate” video has 45,000 views.
* * *
On Wednesday, after contacting De Gregorio for comment, The Post & Email spoke with Zullo about De Gregorio’s subject video, beginning with the question of* * *Rondeau wrote:[W]hether he is acquainted with him, to which Zullo respondedZullo wrote:No, I don’t know him at all.
* * *Rondeau wrote:We asked Zullo about De Gregorio’s characterization of a “change” having been made to the image, to which Zullo repliedZullo wrote:I have no direct knowledge that they changed the file. What I do know is it’s easy to turn the background colors off when you put it into a digital program. That’s not something that’s overly concerning to me. When we put the Obama document in, we were taking the background color and turning it on and off. I don’t think there’s any significance with the short-form; it’s the long form that matters.
Interestingly, approximately two weeks previous to De Gregorio’s video, another finance entity, WallStreetApes.com, posted on “X”:
The post contains a partial transcript, with some errors, of a ten-minute segment from the final December 15, 2016 press conference during which Zullo released new information from the long-running birth-certificate probe revealing “nine points of forgery” discovered in the image.
“They COULD NOT clear the document. Much more info in this video if you watch it all,” WSA concluded its post.
Rondeau wrote:I remember you told Carl Gallups that some years back,” we said.Zullo wrote:It has to do with the Deep State actors; just look what’s going on with Trump. If you go back in the birth certificate timeline, that was their first foray into mass gaslighting the entire nation on a scale never seen before: effectively reporting on information, coordinating with once-trusted news outlets and reporters coming out and using declarative words such as ‘debunked’ and pejoratives such as “birther” and “birtherism” when there was no factual evidence they had ‘debunked’ anything of the work product we created. They just pick up a moniker and run with it as if it’s fact, repeatedly stating the claims across the news spectrum as fact.
You can look to the J6 Committee now and realize they’ve done the same thing. Look at how they are lambasting and falsely labeling President Trump, twisting evidence and omitting information. They just say something and expect you to believe it as fact, and a majority of the gullible public will never challenge them. They perfected this using the birth certificate narrative; that was a controlled narrative.
* * *
I’m going to go one step farther. The long-form birth certificate was obviously manufactured. They went painstakingly through the process of not only manufacturing it but running it through “Preview,” which destroyed the metadata of the electronic file, but they didn’t flatten the document. That troubled me, and I was always asking myself, ‘Why would they make such a drastic mistake?’
I’ve always had a theory – it’s not proved, just a theory — that the long-form birth certificate was utilized as a “control” document in the event Obama, who may not have been born in this country and therefore would not be eligible to be president, it is very possible the very people who put him in power retained leverage, had he not done the bidding of those people. They could then have used that document to literally “out” him and remove him. So I always thought this could possibly be some type of blackmail or “control” document to fulfill the goals of the people who got him there.Rondeau wrote:“That begs the question, ‘Who put him power? Who controls the President of the United States and what he does?” The Post & Email asked.Zullo wrote:Well, obviously, if you look at what’s transpiring now with the Biden administration and all the issues of money-laundering that’s going on with foreign entities, there has to be an internal group. I don’t know who they are, but it would have to be something along those lines. It would have to be people on the inside. Somebody somewhere is doing something. Just look at the voting; a blind man could see that there’s fraud there.
There was scuttlebutt prior to the Biden election that Michelle Obama was going to run for president, and if I go back to that, all of a sudden the birth certificate issue started to spring up again. Now, there’s scuttlebutt that she’s running again, and what happens? These things on social media platforms are coming out on the birth certificate. Is it possible that those are warning shots of “We don’t want her to run, and if that happens, we’re going to out him?Rondeau wrote:Another thing Zach said was that birth certificates are ‘created on a typewriter,’” we observed. “To your knowledge, is that true today?Zullo wrote:No, the short-form was electronic, and now everything is electronic. But that was not the case in 1961.Rondeau wrote:At 13:30 in the video, Zach said the half-inch seal on the birth certificate image is ‘too small.’ Do remember saying that?”Zullo then observed that both De Gregorio’s video and the WSA “X” post with the clip of his press conference remarks “are both finance feeds.” “Is somebody sending a message?” he asked rhetorically.Zullo wrote:I don’t recall saying that, but I know that the seal was always a question for us and we don’t believe it to be legitimate . . . .
The short-form birth certificate was produced electronically, but they get printed onto safety paper. The perilous dynamic for the long-form is that in 1961, it would have had to have been typewritten, and that’s when you use the comparison to the Nordykes’. In the typewritten documents, which were presumably typed by the same clerk or even in the same typing pool with the same typewriters, you can see the different spaces because they’re done by hand, and the carriage would have had to move by hand. So it makes the 1961 birth certificate for Obama that much more difficult to create today, and that’s where the Ah’Nee birth certificate played a critical role because it would be impossible to get documents created either 15 years or 15 days apart, however you want to look at it, to be typewritten and have the same spacing in that word group as another typewritten document.Zullo wrote:That’s my question today. You wouldn’t think this topic would be prominent with anyone investing in stock unless Wall Street is trying to send a message. That goes back to my theory, which I can talk about now because the investigation is over, that it goes back to some type of ‘control’ document. There’s no way you’re going to get around the fact that that’s a manufactured certificate. Our experts proved that. There’s no way you’re going to get around the fact that the governor of Hawaii could not find the certificate, and there’s no way you’re going to get around the fact that he came right out later and said, ‘Oh, it was in the archives; it wasn’t in the book it was supposed to be in.’ There’s no way you can get around the fact that Alvin Onaka didn’t want to talk to anybody. There’s no way you can get around the fact that Alvin Onaka, a year after it was reported not to be found, all of a sudden, in an unrelated meeting, cites the page and volume number that it’s in. You can’t escape the fact that Alvin Onaka took possession of that book and reportedly locked it away in a file cabinet. So all of a sudden, now it appears in a bound volume? (p. 32, bottom left) You can’t escape the fact that we were told by former CIA officers that they were going to do exactly that: that the book was going to be taken off the shelves and locked in a closet or in a vault away from anyone’s access. And lo and behold, mysteriously now we have it in the book. There’s no way you can get around everybody on the planet saying Obama produced a birth certificate when at his very own presser, a reporter was saying, ‘But you never showed us the certificate.’ You can’t get around the fact that he never took possession of it and held it up and said, ‘This is mine.’
You start putting all these things together, and it is the same scenario today: you know there’s voter fraud, but you know what? There isn’t, because the media says so. That’s out of the same playbook.
.And I lurve how Rondeau's pronouns jump around!
s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" 
Perhaps Donald Trump is just a nom de voyage (or nom de trahison?) and in fact the malodorous orange lardbucket is the mysterious Harrison Bounel, out to avenge the wrong committed by Barack Obama stealing his SSN? 
X 4
