Correct nutjob. Vallely also was a birther, natch.
Still searching for relevancy at 83!Actually I thought he had gone to that Grand slam Jury in the sky.
Correct nutjob. Vallely also was a birther, natch.
Still searching for relevancy at 83!Actually I thought he had gone to that Grand slam Jury in the sky.
Larry Klayman @LarryEKlayman Aug 27
@kevinomccarthy McCarthy is a coward and the Dems likely have stuff on him trading influence. Why else has Biden not been impeached! Larry Klayman http://freedomwatchusa.org
Luke Johnson @Orly_licious 1h
Larry, why does the House GOP need to impeach him? Your Citizen Grand Jury took care of it, didn't they? It's like how your Citizen Grand Jury “convicted” President Barack Obama of fraud, and your rally at the White House forced Obama out. Must be legit since you're an attorney.
These morons don't have any idea what the legal definition of treason is. Nor do they care.bob wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 9:06 pm I hope the Bidens send a good lawyer to sentencing because I guess the "judge"* "forgot" treason requires two witnesses.
No the definition IS being a Democrat...
Far-right activist and legal gadfly Larry Klayman announced this month that a “citizen grand jury” had indicted President Joe Biden and members of his family, and that a “citizens’ judge” has handed down felony convictions after a “trial” in Boise, Idaho.
“BREAKING: The Bidens Convicted!” was the subject line of an August 24 email sent by Klayman’s group Freedom Watch to readers of the right-wing publication Human Events. Klayman has also talked about the Biden “conviction” in online videos, where he has also posted clips of “evidence” being presented to the fake judge in the fake trial.
Klayman said that “sentencing of the corrupt Biden plan” will be held August 29. “We will then commission established law enforcement and the military to take Biden and his son and his brother into custody if they don’t turn themselves in, and frankly, put them in the slammer,” he said in a video posted on YouTube. He has promised future trials of public health official Anthony Fauci and other perceived enemies of the MAGA movement.
ETA: https://law.justia.com/codes/florida/20 ... n-843.0855843.0855 - Criminal actions under color of law or through use of simulated legal process.
(3) A person who simulates legal process, including, but not limited to, actions affecting title to real estate or personal property, indictments, subpoenas, warrants, injunctions, liens, orders, judgments, or any legal documents or proceedings, knowing or having reason to know the contents of any such documents or proceedings or the basis for any action to be fraudulent, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(4) A person who falsely under color of law attempts in any way to influence, intimidate, harass, retaliate against, or hinder a public officer or employee involving the discharge of his or her official duties by means of, but not limited to, threats of or actual physical abuse or harassment, or through the use of simulated legal process, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
What is a little odd is that the format does not look like his other filings. I am not sure what was happening there.Order
The plaintiff moves for clerk’s default against Fox Sports, Inc. Doc. 82. The Court denies the motion, Doc. 82, without prejudice to filing a motion that complies with the typography requirements of Local Rule 1.08.
Ordered in Jacksonville, Florida, on September 6, 2023.
What I would be showing, if it worked, was a ruling from the judge in his many GIL vs the evil DC Bar Folk cases, regarding the DC Board's request for clarification on his order that GIL stop filing cases against the DC Board of Professional Responsibilities.Object not found!
The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again.
However, since he agreed his original August 2022 order was vague, Klayman's new case in the DC Superior Court may continue (Klayman v. Sataki, where he is suing the DC board again but added Sataki, who was the original person/complainant in the discipline case and who he is also suing in Florida state court).the plaintiff is ENJOINED from:
(1) filing, in any federal court, state court, or any other forum, any new action, complaint, or claim for relief concerning any matter derived from the plaintiff’s disciplinary proceedings which are the subject of this case as well as Klayman v. Fox, Civil Action No. 18-1579; Klayman v. Lim, Civil Action No. 18-2209; and Klayman v. Porter, No. 2020 CA 000756 B, and against the defendants; their employer, the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel; current and former employees of the office of Disciplinary Counsel, the Board of Professional Responsibility; or any D.C. Bar officials; or
(2) serving or causing to be served any of the defendants with a subpoena or any other instrumentality of civil discovery as a third party in any other legal proceeding in which the plaintiff is a party, and that concerns any matter derived from the plaintiff’s disciplinary proceedings which are the subject of this case as well as Klayman v. Fox, Civil Action No. 18-cv-1579; Klayman v. Lim, Civil Action No. 18-cv-2209; and Klayman v. Porter, No. 2020 CA 000756 B.
If Klayman is honest on his application, unlikely.
For completeness, this summer the SD of Florida suspended Klayman based on the DC discipline. However, the Rokit World case had been dismissed sua sponte in April, long before the district suspended him.
Currently, it is still early, and a referee has been appointed.SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
The Florida Bar,
Complainant(s)
v.
Larry Elliot Klayman,
Respondent(s)
CASE NUMBER
SC2023-1219
CLASSIFICATION
Original Proceedings - Florida Bar - Complaint
DOCKET DATE
08/29/2023
Rooting for GIL to screw up so much he gets an EASTMAN TRIAL (As Realist might say, )WHEREFORE, The Florida Bar prays respondent will be appropriately disciplined in accordance with the provisions of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar as amended
I would normally expect him to sue the DC Board for something the Florida Bar is doing but he may pause. A DC District Judge has stated he cannot file a suit against the DC Board in relation to these discipline issues without the court's permission.W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 12:19 pm And a new complaint against the DC bar will be filed in 3..2..1..