Corporations Behaving Badly
- roadscholar
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 am
- Location: Baltimore
- Occupation: Renaissance Mechanic
- Contact:
Corporations Behaving Badly
Hmmm. I guess there really are "death panels."
The bitterest truth is more wholesome than the sweetest lie.
Corporations Behaving Badly
I may be completely off-base here -- but I thought COBRA coverage was continued insurance guaranteeing you could retain coverage from the employers plan -- but you had to pay the FULL premium, not just the employee $ share and limited to (6?) months. The former employer wasn't kicking in a dime.
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
Corporations Behaving Badly
Yeah, but I bet they’re trying to kill the plan.neonzx wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 4:43 pm I may be completely off-base here -- but I thought COBRA coverage was continued insurance guaranteeing you could retain coverage from the employers plan -- but you had to pay the FULL premium, not just the employee $ share and limited to (6?) months. The former employer wasn't kicking in a dime.
- Phoenix520
- Posts: 4151
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
- Verified: ✅
Corporations Behaving Badly
When I was laid off from my favorite job they paid us all severance and paid for 6 months of COBRA.
The boss had been busted for doing a shady deal with Berlusconi (tv syndication stuff) and tax evasion. Money was tight but they treated us well.
The boss had been busted for doing a shady deal with Berlusconi (tv syndication stuff) and tax evasion. Money was tight but they treated us well.
-
- Posts: 4491
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
- Location: Down here!
Corporations Behaving Badly
Could it be that the plan was long dead???pipistrelle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:36 pmYeah, but I bet they’re trying to kill the plan.neonzx wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 4:43 pm I may be completely off-base here -- but I thought COBRA coverage was continued insurance guaranteeing you could retain coverage from the employers plan -- but you had to pay the FULL premium, not just the employee $ share and limited to (6?) months. The former employer wasn't kicking in a dime.
ie the company had defaulted on the plan payments and just forgot to tell anyone...
Corporations Behaving Badly
I bet the owners will get nice, hefty bonuses.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- Frater I*I
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
- Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
- Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
- Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
- Contact:
Corporations Behaving Badly
When you own a mansion, 2 penthouses, 5 luxury sport cars, and a helicopter, $30 million just doesn't go as far as it used to.....
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"
Trent Reznor
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"
Trent Reznor
Corporations Behaving Badly
You’re right, except it’s 18 months or it was in 2018.neonzx wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 4:43 pm I may be completely off-base here -- but I thought COBRA coverage was continued insurance guaranteeing you could retain coverage from the employers plan -- but you had to pay the FULL premium, not just the employee $ share and limited to (6?) months. The former employer wasn't kicking in a dime.
On the other hand, if they’ve laid everyone off, there may no longer be a plan.
Corporations Behaving Badly
From what I read elsewhere, that's what probably happened. You can't continue to pay for a corporate health care plan if that plan has been cancelled. The same comments also mentioned not requiring 60 days notice if doing so would impact union contract negotiations.jcolvin2 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 3:34 pmMaybe the company had already terminated the health insurance plan ...tek wrote: ↑Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:49 am seems odd to not offer COBRA, given that it probably doesn't cost the company anything:Something seems strange here.Employers may require individuals to pay for COBRA continuation coverage. Premiums cannot exceed the full cost of coverage, plus a 2 percent administration charge.
- Tiredretiredlawyer
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
- Location: Rescue Pets Land
- Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
- Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting
Corporations Behaving Badly
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani ... r-AA168l3I
SEC fines former McDonald's CEO for misleading investors about his firing
The Securities and Exchange Commission charged former McDonald's CEO Steve Easterbrook on Monday with misrepresenting his November 2019 firing.
Easterbrook has agreed to a $400,000 fine, without admitting or denying the claims, and will be barred from serving as an officer or director for any SEC-reporting company for five years.
McDonald's board fired Easterbrook in 2019 for a consensual relationship with an employee, which violated the company's fraternization policy. However, he wasn't fired for cause, allowing him to receive a severance package.
Months later, the fast-food giant sued its former chief executive, claiming he committed fraud and lied to cover up additional inappropriate relationships with employees. In December 2021, the two parties settled the lawsuit, and McDonald's successfully clawed back Easterbrook's severance, valued at $105 million.
The agency also found McDonald's violated the Exchange Act, which prohibits companies from material misrepresentations and omissions in proxy statements sent to shareholders, but is not imposing a financial penalty on McDonald's because of its "substantial" cooperation with the agency during its investigation.
McDonald's has not admitted or denied the SEC's findings. In a statement, the company said that the SEC's actions reinforce what it has previously said about its handling of Easterbrook's misconduct.
"The Company continues to ensure our values are part of everything we do, and we are proud of our strong 'speak up' culture that encourages employees to report conduct by any employee, including the CEO, that falls short of our expectations," McDonald's said.
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Corporations Behaving Badly
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
Corporations Behaving Badly
PTO donation is common practice.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Corporations Behaving Badly
I get that, but it is still crap. Especially when being espoused by the President & CEO, who conceivably could show some compassion.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:23 pm
- Location: Michigan
- Verified: Badges... we don't need no stinkin' badges
Corporations Behaving Badly
More than that, I would argue that quietly giving the employee extra PTO for her medical issues would have a great positive benefit for the morale of the company. But this type of behavior is a feature of shareholder capitalism and finite thinking (as opposed to stakeholder capitalism and infinite thinking).raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:24 amI get that, but it is still crap. Especially when being espoused by the President & CEO, who conceivably could show some compassion.
- noblepa
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
Corporations Behaving Badly
I don't quite see the problem here.Slarti the White wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:47 pmMore than that, I would argue that quietly giving the employee extra PTO for her medical issues would have a great positive benefit for the morale of the company. But this type of behavior is a feature of shareholder capitalism and finite thinking (as opposed to stakeholder capitalism and infinite thinking).raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:24 amI get that, but it is still crap. Especially when being espoused by the President & CEO, who conceivably could show some compassion.
Having the company "quietly give the employee extra PTO" raises all kinds of fairness issues. If they give it to one, and not to another, the excrement will surely strike the air-movement device. Who makes the decision as to whether the need is legitimate? If you give it to anyone who asks for extra PTO, then you've effectively eliminated the limit and everyone gets unlimited PTO.
I worked for a county government in Ohio. They have a very generous sick leave policy. We got 15 days per year, and unused sick leave could accumulate indefinitely, without limit. However, some employees regarded this as a secondary vacation. As soon as they accumulated a day or two of sick leave, they took them. We had a couple of occasions where one of these employees used all their sick leave frivolously, then asked others to donate sick days when they were really sick. I always regarded it as short-term disability insurance. I could have had an auto accident and lost two months of work.
By having other employees donate PTO, the legitimacy question is left up to the sick employee's peers, not management.
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:23 pm
- Location: Michigan
- Verified: Badges... we don't need no stinkin' badges
Corporations Behaving Badly
That message from the CEO was a huge red flag and indicative of what I consider the ethical bankruptcy of most corporations these days. Typically, CEOs have a fiduciary responsibility (and almost always a personal stake as well) to the stockholders -- i.e. the short-term stock price. Which means that if they can make the company look better on the balance sheet by screwing over their customers, employees, suppliers, or the public at large (without actually breaking the law), they are obligated to do it. Employees that know the company has no loyalty towards them generally do not feel loyalty towards the company, leading to behavior like that of your co-workers (for example). This leads to "gaming" the system -- for some, like you, that means banking two months worth of sick leave just in case, to others, like the coworkers you spoke of, this means using sick leave as personal time as quickly as possible (so that they don't get "screwed" out of it somehow). Now, you said you worked for the government, not a corporation, but how you treat your employees is how you treat your employees -- and what comes around goes around in how your employees treat you.noblepa wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:01 pmI don't quite see the problem here.Slarti the White wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:47 pmMore than that, I would argue that quietly giving the employee extra PTO for her medical issues would have a great positive benefit for the morale of the company. But this type of behavior is a feature of shareholder capitalism and finite thinking (as opposed to stakeholder capitalism and infinite thinking).raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:24 am
I get that, but it is still crap. Especially when being espoused by the President & CEO, who conceivably could show some compassion.
Having the company "quietly give the employee extra PTO" raises all kinds of fairness issues. If they give it to one, and not to another, the excrement will surely strike the air-movement device. Who makes the decision as to whether the need is legitimate? If you give it to anyone who asks for extra PTO, then you've effectively eliminated the limit and everyone gets unlimited PTO.
I worked for a county government in Ohio. They have a very generous sick leave policy. We got 15 days per year, and unused sick leave could accumulate indefinitely, without limit. However, some employees regarded this as a secondary vacation. As soon as they accumulated a day or two of sick leave, they took them. We had a couple of occasions where one of these employees used all their sick leave frivolously, then asked others to donate sick days when they were really sick. I always regarded it as short-term disability insurance. I could have had an auto accident and lost two months of work.
By having other employees donate PTO, the legitimacy question is left up to the sick employee's peers, not management.
I don't disagree with you on how things work in most businesses today, I just believe that way is pretty fucked up. As you said, the legitimacy of an employee's sickness is being left up to their peers, not management -- in other words, significant decisions impacting a person's health are being made by untrained coworkers in ignorance of medical knowledge and absent medical ethics. Which is a shameless passing of the buck by the CEO.
But that's what you get when the only people executives are beholden to is the stockholders and their own bank accounts.
Corporations Behaving Badly
I'm not real clear on the history of corporations, but my understanding is that they originally had to have a purpose other than just making money and were given terms (20 years, I think) of existence. Over time, they granted themselves more power and wrote the rules. Those rules benefitted themselves, at the expense of everyone else. It doesn't have to be this way. It just is.
In Germany, union leaders sit on boards of companies.
In Germany, union leaders sit on boards of companies.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Corporations Behaving Badly
Not always in the best interest of the companies. In the largeest companies the union representation became the plush retirement seats for the top union leaders, themselves already detached from the realities of the basis. There are several examples where the union representation did fight back against necessary changes and the companies missed the timely turnaround to changes in the markets. All about keeping their own position among the union leaders, as also to keep the salararies of the workforce at artificial historical high levels although adjustments in the workforce and payment structure was needed. Several failed conglomerates are know to have crashed due to this constellation.AndyinPA wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 2:55 pm I'm not real clear on the history of corporations, but my understanding is that they originally had to have a purpose other than just making money and were given terms (20 years, I think) of existence. Over time, they granted themselves more power and wrote the rules. Those rules benefitted themselves, at the expense of everyone else. It doesn't have to be this way. It just is.
In Germany, union leaders sit on boards of companies.
Corporations Behaving Badly
I ran through my sick leave due to there 3 surgeries over two years, and I was worried. HR sent out a letter to all employees that I had a serious medical condition and asked if they would contribute some of their sick leave. An hour, a day, whatever they wanted to contribute. Nothing was said about what the condition was, and the donors were not disclosed. I was stunned and grateful by the donations I received. They got me through a bad time.
You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
- pipistrelle
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am
Corporations Behaving Badly
This is exactly why. Fairness and perception of fairness, especially in a large company. I've donated (or tried to; the person ended up not needing the donated days).noblepa wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:01 pmI don't quite see the problem here.Slarti the White wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:47 pmMore than that, I would argue that quietly giving the employee extra PTO for her medical issues would have a great positive benefit for the morale of the company. But this type of behavior is a feature of shareholder capitalism and finite thinking (as opposed to stakeholder capitalism and infinite thinking).raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:24 am
I get that, but it is still crap. Especially when being espoused by the President & CEO, who conceivably could show some compassion.
Having the company "quietly give the employee extra PTO" raises all kinds of fairness issues. If they give it to one, and not to another, the excrement will surely strike the air-movement device. Who makes the decision as to whether the need is legitimate? If you give it to anyone who asks for extra PTO, then you've effectively eliminated the limit and everyone gets unlimited PTO.
By having other employees donate PTO, the legitimacy question is left up to the sick employee's peers, not management.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Corporations Behaving Badly
https://futurism.com/the-byte/volkswage ... pped-childVOLKSWAGEN REFUSED TO TRACK CAR WITH KIDNAPPED CHILD UNTIL OWNER RENEWED GPS SUBSCRIPTION
A carjacker assaulted a 34-year-old pregnant woman in Illinois, stealing her Volkswagen, along with her two year old boy trapped in the back seat, and running her over on the way out. Although badly injured, the woman managed to call 911. With little idea of where the carjacker fled, Lake County sheriffs rushed to call Volkswagen's Car-Net service to track down her car.
But Volkswagen Car-Net refused to play ball — not because it had any qualms with forking over information to the police, but because the mother hadn't renewed her subscription.
Instead, VW insisted someone pay the $150 fee to reactivate the tracking service. Sheriffs pleaded with the company, explaining the gravity of the situation — but VW didn't budge.
While the fee was eventually paid by a relative, the dispute ended up causing a costly delay, which deputy chief Chris Covelli described as "16 minutes of hell," according to the Chicago Tribune.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Corporations Behaving Badly
She's a real piece of work.
Zoom call from a ceo who cancelled all employee bonuses but took a $6.4 million bonus herself
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
Corporations Behaving Badly
Do as I say, no as I do.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Corporations Behaving Badly
We all know the real problem here isn't with the corporations, it's with the state legislatures failing to roll back child labor laws fast enough to keep up with reality.
DOL statement: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230502-0
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/03/business ... index.html10-year-old children were found working at a Louisville McDonald’s until 2 a.m.
Two 10-year-old children were found working at a Louisville McDonald’s restaurant — sometimes until 2 a.m. — the US Department of Labor said Tuesday.
The revelation was part of an investigation into the child labor law violations in the Southeast. The agency also found three franchisees that own more than 60 McDonald’s locations in Kentucky, Indiana, Maryland and Ohio, “employed 305 children to work more than the legally permitted hours and perform tasks prohibited by law for young workers,” the Labor Department said in a statement.
“Investigators from the department’s Wage and Hour Division found two 10-year-old workers at a Louisville McDonald’s restaurant among many violations of federal labor laws committed by three Kentucky McDonald’s franchise operators,” the release said. “Investigators also determined two 10-year-old children were employed – but not paid – and sometimes worked as late as 2 a.m.”
DOL statement: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230502-0
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17167
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Corporations Behaving Badly
Same as reported by NBC News --- https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/10 ... -rcna82583