Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#51

Post by bob »

Foggy wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:17 amFirst, Kamala Harris is neither the president nor is she constitutionally eligible for that office, for she is not a natural born citizen.
Some of the RWNJs claim that Harris is decisionmaker ('cuz Biden is old, yaknow) -- POTUS in all but title, they say.

P&E comments:
[some jerk] wrote:PBA is a medical condition, to be diagnosed by an actual medical doctor.
Laity wrote:I have medical training. I have college degrees in Anatomy and Physiology as well as Psychology. I speak with the authority of credentials on the subject. I also said “probably suffers from Pseudobulbar affect. I also have experience as a Mental Health Counselor (Neuro-Psychiatry) in the U.S. Navy.
Laity, who has an online B.A. (in psychology), is qualified to make remote medical diagnoses. :roll:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#52

Post by Luke »

Robert Laity says:
Sunday, April 4, 2021 at 5:35 AM
I tire of your gainsaying and discouragement Henry. I am going forward with my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. SCOTUS has the final say on standing. You haven’t seen my arguments yet Henry. I am a Navy veteran. I don’t give up the ship. I won’t back down on bringing usurpers to Justice.


Robert Laity says:
Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 4:10 AM
Laity v Harris is currently on print schedule by Cockle Legal Briefs and is being prepared for Petition for Writ of Certiorari at this time. The US Allegiance Institute Amicus Brief is being inserted in the case appendix.

Henry Wilson says:
Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 1:21 PM
Mario Apuzzo’s group’s brief doesn’t add anything: the definition of natural born citizen will not be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court because the judges below ruled there was no standing.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#53

Post by Luke »

Laity took a trip down Memory Lane on Facebook... alone.


ML4.JPG
ML4.JPG (29.59 KiB) Viewed 10653 times

ML3.JPG
ML3.JPG (32.75 KiB) Viewed 10653 times

ML 2.JPG
ML 2.JPG (34.47 KiB) Viewed 10653 times

ML.JPG
ML.JPG (27.83 KiB) Viewed 10653 times

This was written by the Rev. Dr. Laity, ESQ BBQ WTF a timely 4,132 days ago (h/t Alexa).
POSTED IN LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Obama must be arrested!
Monday, December 21, 2009


Deathcare.JPG
Deathcare.JPG (66.47 KiB) Viewed 10653 times

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama is a fraud, a traitor and a criminal deviant!
In response to the guest editorial, on Dec. 19th, by Neil Sankey, entitled: And they always told us to Question Authority!

December 21, 2009

Dear Editor,

Thank you Mr. Sankey!

You have proven yourself a patriot. We must be “ever vigilant.” After 13 months of daily blogging, research and observations, I am convinced that Barack Hussein Obama is a fraud, a traitor and a criminal deviant.

He is a radical Muslim supremacist who has associated with and continues to associate with some of the world’s worse criminals. Obama is the “Don” of the “Muslim Mafia”. All world despots have a point at which their respective reigns of terror starts. Obama is overtly anti-American. He supports communistic, socialists, islamo-nazi attempts to undermine democracy. Obama should have been arrested many months ago.

I, myself, do not mince words.I have spoken my mind about Obama, holding nothing back, filing various charges against him, participating in citizen’s grand juries. I have written hundreds of thousands of words on Topix, Newsvine, Fox Nation, Buffalo News and any other blog or news media commentary that I could get involved in. I have written online at Australia TO and Pravda. Obama is disqualified to be the President of the United States.

There must be a very large cabal of co-conspirators protecting him from arrest or from facing the music. This is a conspiracy of epic proportions. The United States has been usurped. I was “Conceived in liberty.” I want the blessings of liberty for our posterity as did our founders. The founding brothers wanted something special. One nation under God. Every generation is obligated to and entrusted with doing their part to defend, even to death, what many have already done over the last 233 years, sacrificed their lives and blood and “Sacred duty.”

Obama may be popular but so was Hitler. Obama, at this time is being restricted a bit by the intense public scrutiny that is being placed on him by people like Mr. Sankey. Obama continues to have his anti-American agenda, however, it is being somewhat stifled and controlled by public scrutiny and pressure. As time passes and Obama becomes more insulated, by his “in his pocket” media and hired criminal “czars,” his actions will become more flagrant and offensive.

The key to stop this is to nip it in the bud. Eric Holder MUST appoint a special prosecutor to try Obama upon the charges already filed against him. Namely, treason and federal election fraud. Along with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and others, Obama MUST be arrested and tried. He is a usurper. He is a criminal deviant miscreant traitor to all we hold dear as Americans. I am sure that the race card will be played. That is a gimmick, a political correctness ploy. The fact remains that, regardless of whether Obama is Black, White (or Green, for that matter), he is a criminal fraud and traitor.

Here , at this point in history, December 21, 2009, those of us who live now MUST take our responsibilities to preserve the republic, very seriously. I will continue to fight Obama in everything he does. Whether what he does is positive (actually improving our lot in life) or negative, Obama is NOT qualified or authorized to sign any bills or “do” anything in the capacity of President of the United States.

Action MUST be taken. Obama is a Machiavellian prevaricator. He is a facade behind which his cabalist puppeteers control him. We are at a turning point. We will NOT have a New World Order or a giving up of sovereignty, as Obama leads us to, IF we fight back. We must get off our collective arses and we must give up any apathetic desires to live and let live or to see what happens if we do nothing. “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” I have collected close to ten thousand links and articles regarding Obama. The majority of them point to the fact that Obama is NOT who he claims he is. And, he certainly is NOT the President of the United States.

Sincerely,

Robert C. Laity
Founder and President

Society for the Preservation of Democracy and Human Rights
43 Mosher Drive
Tonawanda, NY 14150-5217
(716) 693-1630
Good to see Laity is moving on with his life after 4,132 days of failure.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#54

Post by bob »

P&E:
Harris Eligibility Case Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court
:
[NO STUPID KICKER! :eek: ]

On Monday morning, a case challenging the constitutional eligibility of Kamala D. Harris to serve as vice president or president of the United States which was denied a hearing based on alleged lack of “standing” is being taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Plaintiff Robert Laity believes that Harris, a former U.S. senator from California, does not qualify as a “natural born Citizen” as the U.S. Constitution requires for president and the 12th Amendment requires for vice president of the United States. Laity is therefore requesting a writ of certiorari from the high court via a brief expected to arrive at the office of the clerk by 10:30 a.m. EDT.
Laity's use of a delivery company is newsworthy!

But the alleged petition hasn't yet been docketed.

Bonus:
ron vrooman wrote:Robert Laity is in the wrong jurisdiction for remedy, He is welcome to use our court. We have a Grand Jury Presentment against the Republican, Democrat, Green and Libertarian Parties and The Sec. of State for Oregon. Is has morphed into Treason as Harris was on the ballot.
We are the Oregon Statewide Jural Assenbly’s Civilian Court of record, Grand Jury and Article III Amendment VII court. We are also the 2nd Amendment well regulated militia.
:thumbsup:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#55

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:11 pm Bonus:
ron vrooman wrote:Robert Laity is in the wrong jurisdiction for remedy, He is welcome to use our court. We have a Grand Jury Presentment against the Republican, Democrat, Green and Libertarian Parties and The Sec. of State for Oregon. Is has morphed into Treason as Harris was on the ballot.
We are the Oregon Statewide Jural Assenbly’s Civilian Court of record, Grand Jury and Article III Amendment VII court. We are also the 2nd Amendment well regulated militia.
:thumbsup:
I think even Laity will poo-poo that one. He believes in prosecuting his mistaken understanding of the law in real courts because he wants Harris, Biden, and Obama really gone not just fake gone.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#56

Post by Luke »

Gosh, Rev Dr Laity ESQ is getting so darn close! Realist and I are dusting off the playbooks mentioned above. But dammit! Adding this extra PANIC with what will shirley be curtains for Kamala Harris is so unfair! :panic:


A while back, did an explainer on the Justice Thomas throwaway joke about "evading" the birth certificate issue, which had nothing to do with President Obama.
00:36 Thomas: mr. chairman it's always an
00:38 honor being here you and I have been
00:42 at this together for a decade and a half
00:45 Serrano: I'm glad to hear that you don't
00:49 think there has to be a judge on the
00:50 court of appeal because I'm not a judge
00:52 Thomas: well and you don't have to be born in
00:54 the United States you never have to
00:55 answer that question Serrano: oh really so
00:59 you haven't answered the one about
01:00 whether I can serve as president because
01:02 of this... Thomas: we're evading that one
01:04 so we're giving you another option
LOTS OF LAUGHTER FROM ALL


So in honor of birfers a) having no sense of humor b) grasping at any straw and c) deluding themselves into believing with all certainty any nonsense they read, we should start a STUPID EVASIVE AWARD for any birther who uses that ridiculous example. Our first winner: Nikita!



Nikita's_UN_Shoesays:
Monday, April 19, 2021 at 10:27 AM
It’s time for Associate Justice Clarence Thomas of the US Supreme Court to resurface his prior words, break-the-ice, stop the evasion, and start the debate among his peers, then define the phrase “natural born Citizen” of which that phrase only appears in one place in the US Constitution that focuses on the Executive Office and that appears no place in any existing active law.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1359
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#57

Post by realist »

ron vrooman wrote:
Robert Laity is in the wrong jurisdiction for remedy, He is welcome to use our court. We have a Grand Jury Presentment against the Republican, Democrat, Green and Libertarian Parties and The Sec. of State for Oregon. Is has morphed into Treason as Harris was on the ballot.
We are the Oregon Statewide Jural Assenbly’s Civilian Court of record, Grand Jury and Article III Amendment VII court.
We are also the 2nd Amendment well regulated militia.
In other words, nothing that actually has any legal force and effect and resembles a real court of law.

Meh. Not even Laity is that dumb.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 33
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 8049
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#58

Post by pipistrelle »

bob wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:29 pm
Foggy wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:17 amFirst, Kamala Harris is neither the president nor is she constitutionally eligible for that office, for she is not a natural born citizen.
Some of the RWNJs claim that Harris is decisionmaker ('cuz Biden is old, yaknow) -- POTUS in all but title, they say.

P&E comments:
[some jerk] wrote:PBA is a medical condition, to be diagnosed by an actual medical doctor.
Laity wrote:I have medical training. I have college degrees in Anatomy and Physiology as well as Psychology. I speak with the authority of credentials on the subject. I also said “probably suffers from Pseudobulbar affect. I also have experience as a Mental Health Counselor (Neuro-Psychiatry) in the U.S. Navy.
Laity, who has an online B.A. (in psychology), is qualified to make remote medical diagnoses. :roll:
Undergrad degrees are not medical training. They mean squat.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#59

Post by bob »

realist wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:30 am In other words, nothing that actually has any legal force and effect and resembles a real court of law.

Meh. Not even Laity is that dumb.
Final answer?:
[some jerk] wrote:The D.C. District Court (where Laity originally filed his lawsuit) ruled years ago that citizen grand juries have no legal power.
Laity wrote:I am not suing via “Citizen Grand Jury”. BTW. The U.S. District Court in D.C. is wrong. Presentment hearings (made up of a citizen empanelled jury, aka “Citizen Grand Jury”) are specifically provided for in the 5th Amendment. In 1946, errant rule makers for the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, erroneously claimed that Presentments were obsolete. The constitution cannot be changed by rule makers. It must be amended pursuant to Article V. Period. “No law, rule or regulation can serve to abrogate a right guaranteed by the Constitution”- Miranda v. Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436

* * *

The U.S. District Court for D.C. is the proper venue for processing an “Information in the Form of Quo Warranto at Common Law” against Kamala Harris.
Dr. Laity, Esq., is wrong about three things at once! The 5th Amendment says nothing about citizen grand juries. Presentments are mentioned in the 5th, but they apply only to duly constituted grand juries. And, of course, the DDC and D.C. Cir. already have dumped his failsuit for lack of standing.

And, of course (too also):
Laity wrote:SCOTUS HAS defined “Natural Born Citizen” several times in the last (200+) years. They need only to adjudicate Laity v. Harris in light of those previous determinations. An NBC IS one born in the United States to parents who are BOTH U.S. Citizens themselves. This is established law.
:yawn:
F. Chance C Chenoweth wrote:While I fully believe that the “natural born citizen” is a requirement for president and vice-president, the fact that both parties have fielded non-NBC candidates, both parties have therefore essentially invalidated the requirement. It may be too late to lock the barn door; the horse has already left.
Laity wrote:Breaking the law does not “essentially invalidate” said law. It only indicates that both parties are guilty of criminal fraud.
:yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#60

Post by bob »

Update, April 20, 2021, 7:04 a.m. EDT:
As this story went to press on Monday, the package of briefs was delivered to the clerk of the Supreme Court as shown by the receipt Laity provided Tuesday morning[.]
:smoking:

(But still not docketed.)

And, of course:
Laity wrote:This time, I am IN the proper venue. I believe that I will prevail this time around.
Because Laity's predictive skills have served him well before. :roll:
Laity wrote:Prior to 1946 many judges and public officials were removed for malfeasance by the citizens that made up grand juries. Today’s grand juries are all judicially empaneled. These are NOT the same pre-1946 citizen grand juries which were free from judicial interference and were not controlled by prosecutors. They were NON-Judicial juries. Too many public officials were subject to removal under their constitutional authority. The PTB couldn’t let that power stand so they fraudulently ruled them to be “Obsolete” and unconstitutionally did away with them. That authority STILL exists. It need only be exercised by the people. The late Justice Antonin Scalia agreed.
:yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
sterngard friegen
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:51 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#61

Post by sterngard friegen »

:nope:
Neither disbarred nor disciplined after representing President Barack Obama. :oldman:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#62

Post by bob »

P&E comments:
Laity wrote:First of all, there is no mention in the Constitution stating that a Grand Jury must be judicially empaneled. It also differentiates between “presentment” OR “indictment of a Grand Jury”. Rights not enumerated to the Federal Government and the States are reserved for the PEOPLE. You are in need of remedial instruction on just what it means to be the sovereign in a government of the PEOPLE. Government serves the PEOPLE by consent of the governed. We the People are the sovereign not the other way around.

* * *

I direct you to “If it is not a runaway, it’s not a real Grand Jury”, Creighton Law Review, Volume 33, No.4 1999-2000, 821 School of Law, Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska
I am INVOKING a citizen's grand jury to indite Laity for criminal stupidity.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#63

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 6:17 pm P&E comments:
Laity wrote:First of all, there is no mention in the Constitution stating that a Grand Jury must be judicially empaneled. It also differentiates between “presentment” OR “indictment of a Grand Jury”. Rights not enumerated to the Federal Government and the States are reserved for the PEOPLE. You are in need of remedial instruction on just what it means to be the sovereign in a government of the PEOPLE. Government serves the PEOPLE by consent of the governed. We the People are the sovereign not the other way around.

* * *

I direct you to “If it is not a runaway, it’s not a real Grand Jury”, Creighton Law Review, Volume 33, No.4 1999-2000, 821 School of Law, Creighton University, Omaha Nebraska
I am INVOKING a citizen's grand jury to indite Laity for criminal stupidity.
So, somebody on the Supreme Court once told grand juries:
Under the authority of that act, this court now sits. Its jurisdiction is twofold, civil and criminal. To the exercise of the latter you, gentlemen, are necessary, and for that purpose are now convened.
Golly, it sounds like they were convened by the court. The justice must have been some freedom-hating dude who did not understand America.

John Jay.

Besides mentioning the job to investigate (but also protect the innocent from over zealous prosecution), he also said:
It cannot be too strongly impressed on the minds of us all how greatly our individual prosperity depends on our national prosperity, and how greatly our national prosperity depends on a well organized, vigorous government, ruling by wise and equal laws, faithfully executed; nor is such a government un-friendly to liberty--to that liberty which is really inestimable; on the contrary, nothing but a strong government of laws irresistibly bearing down arbitrary power and licentiousness can defend it against those two formidable enemies. Let it be remembered that civil liberty consists not in a right to every man to do just what he pleases, but it consists in an equal right to all the citizens to have, enjoy, and to do, in peace, security, and without molestation, whatever the equal and constitutional laws of the country admit to be consistent with the public good. It is the duty and the interest, therefore, of all good citizens, in their several stations, to support the laws and the government which thus protect their rights and
liberties.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#64

Post by Luke »

Please tell that dead-ender that yes, sovereign power rests with the people, which is exercised through representative bodies such as Congress. He seems to have missed that part. :lol:

Creighton Law Review :lol: That's not a University, it's a strange document dump site and that article is by criminal Roger Roots.

Roger's SovCit & White Supremacy background: https://www.irehr.org/reports/peoples-r ... ger-roots/

They didn't even want to admit him to the RI Bar (and he's not a member of the Montana Bar, where he apparently lives). This was from 2000: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ri-supreme- ... 01247.html

Can't find a text version of Lamberth's smackdown of Carl Swensson of that stupid Super American Grand Jury bullsh*t but this is the PDF: https://cases.justia.com/federal/distri ... 1377081380

Wikipedia has some of it:
Obama citizenship citizen grand juries
Some campaigners, led by Georgia activist Carl Swensson, have sought to, "finally expose the conspiracy behind President Obama's birth certificate," by forming what they term "citizen grand juries" to indict Obama. The "citizen grand juries" are based on the Fifth Amendment's premise that "no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury."[according to whom?]

Although the activists managed to hand out copies of "indictments" to Congressional staff, the courts have not regarded the "citizen grand juries" favorably. In June 2009, a group of 172 campaigners declared themselves to be a "Super American Grand Jury" and voted to charge Obama with treason and accused him of not being a U.S. citizen. Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the "indictment" on July 2, 2009 and declared "[T]here is no authority under the Rules of Procedure or in the statutes of the United States for this court to accept [a presentment]... The individuals who have made this presentment were not convened by this court to sit as a grand jury nor have they been selected at random from a fair cross section of this district. Any self-styled indictment or presentment issued by such a group has no force under the Constitution or laws of the United States."
Super.JPG
Super.JPG (87.68 KiB) Viewed 10324 times
Super 2.JPG
Super 2.JPG (38.61 KiB) Viewed 10324 times

Why, it's almost as if he and Rharon have learned nothing since 2009.


And Rev Dr Laity ESQ WTF wonders why he keeps LOSING. :lol: The self-sanctions are the only fun part. Laity keeps sadly posting links to his triumphant P&E articles on his Facebook which nobody engages with except an occasional bleat from Sunderland.

Ed.JPG
Ed.JPG (45.11 KiB) Viewed 10324 times
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 7615
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:01 am
Location: FloriDUH Hell
Verified: 🤩✅✅✅✅✅🤩

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#65

Post by neonzx »

But it was a SUPER American Grand Jury. How did Judge Lamberth miss this? :bag:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#66

Post by northland10 »

orlylicious wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:51 pm Creighton Law Review :lol: That's not a University, it's a strange document dump site and that article is by criminal Roger Roots.
Actually, Creighton University is a university (Jesuit-related) in Omaha, Nebraska. Apparently, Seth Rich was an alum (Rogers Roots was not). They have nearly 9,000 students (grad and undergrad).

The site you were at is their repository for their Law Review and other disciplines. Roots' article is cited elsewhere such as Northwestern University and even the Harvard Law Review.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#67

Post by scirreeve »

orlylicious wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:51 pm and that article is by criminal Roger Roots.
Ha ha - Dr. Roger Roots the felon, racist, sovcit, and former attorney for Shawna Cox. Also President of pretend Lysander Spooner University which proudly lists Lambo and Mrs. Sniper as "professors" (or at least they did at one time - I haven't looked at that stupid site for a long time).
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#68

Post by Luke »

Thanks, Northland! On that page saw CDR and looked like anyone could post there.
Creighton Digital Repository (CDR)
The CDR is an open source solution for capturing, managing, promoting, sharing, and preserving digital collections in any format. It provides both open and secure access to collections or individual items within the repository. Open CDR collections are discoverable via all the major web search engines, which makes the CDR an invaluable tool for promoting and sharing your work with the world-wide scholarly community.
And yes Scir, saw all his crazy racist birther madness. Doesn't Rev Dr Laity ESQ WTF claim a distinguished degree from Lysander Spooner University? Hard to keep track of all his honors but think that was one he was super proud of :lol:

So much dead-ending on that topic, even Rharon at one point commented to an illustrious commenter:
Sharon Rondeau says:
Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 8:56 AM
I have no idea what you are talking about. Comments are moderated when the Editor has the time between writing, editing and accomplishing other necessary tasks.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#69

Post by bob »

orlylicious wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:06 pmDoesn't Rev Dr Laity ESQ WTF claim a distinguished degree from Lysander Spooner University?
American Justice Foundation, which is just some Florida attorney grifting.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#70

Post by bob »

P&E Exclusive: Laity Provides Supreme Court Filing Challenging Harris’s Eligibility:
"USURPATION OF OUR NATION'S HIGHEST OFFICES"

The Post & Email has received a copy of a submission made to the U.S. Supreme Court by Petitioner Robert C. Laity requesting a writ of certiorari regarding his challenge to Kamala Devi Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as the nation’s vice president.
The plebes will have to wait until it officially hits the SCOTUS docket. :torches:
“I had to send out (58) booklets to SCOTUS and the various attorneys and US Officials who are ‘parties to be served,’” Laity told us in an email on Sunday morning.
Self-sanctions are the best sanctions. :towel:
The booklet consists of a number of sections, the longest of which is a series of appendices numbered 1 through 64 containing Laity’s case filings in Harris beginning with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and proceeding through the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

* * *

Laity then presents three questions for the high court to consider, the first of which contends that Harris is “Constitutionally barred” from serving in her current office.
Questions ... question; contentions contend. Who edits this rag?
Question 3 asks whether or not “the Judiciary” can “grant standing to interested third parties…to remedy usurpation of our nation’s highest offices, by fraud.”
The second question essentially is a variant on the third: May Laity ignore that the AG ignored him? (Answer: no.)

The only real issue is whether Laity gets his denial in June or October.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#71

Post by Luke »

Oh gosh, what an honor that Sharon Rondeau's The Post & Email beat out the frenzied competition and got this EXCLUSIVE! Really sorry that The Fogbow came up short.

His multiple degrees are really coming in handy here.
It is the right of the Sovereign to demand of any public official, whose bona-fides is in question, to prove that he or she is entitled by law to occupy the particular public office he or she now occupies. In the U.S. it is “We the People” who are sovereign…
So Rev Dr Laity ESQ WTF is saying all 328.46 million inhabitants of the USA can demand any public official prove they are entitled? Where do we sign up? There are hundreds of Republicans that we DEMAND prove themselves! :P Or are Laity and his pals the only ones who can determine whether, "bona-fides [are] in question".

Nice that Sharon includes some cartoons for OPOVV & his multiple personalities:


Image


NOTHING says SUCCESS like a roadrunner.com email address, very impressive.





Image


Image

The only real issue is whether Laity gets his denial in June or October

But Bob, If Clarence decides to stop "evading the issue", and CJ Roberts realizes if he doesn't submit to Laity he may be next for a DEMAND, couldn't SCOTUS speed this up as an emergency, hypothetically? That would be something to comment on at the P&E, that it's at least possible that AG Garland is terrified his DEMAND might be next, have a secret meeting at, say, a coffee shop, and then fast track this brilliant petition? That would really be something they should get their hopes up for!

Very, very impressive. You know, this might be it! Really! For sure this time!


Wonder if Laity will sell souvenir copies like Orly Taitz' Historic Trial? Laity's in luck, there's advertizing space available!


Image

Historic Trial.JPG
Historic Trial.JPG (68.63 KiB) Viewed 10200 times
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1359
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#72

Post by realist »

:panic:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 33
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#73

Post by bob »

A rare daylight comment from Laity.
Laity wrote:Despite your constant gainsaying, I told you that I can NOT be deterred from a mission. A pit bull will relax it’s mouth muscles just enough to get a stronger grip. I am made BOLDER by my detractors. Kamala Harris is a fraud,usurper,traitor and spy under 18USC and 10USC.
It is adorable that Laity thinks he's a pit bull on a mission.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1359
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#74

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:40 pm A rare daylight comment from Laity.
Laity wrote:Despite your constant gainsaying, I told you that I can NOT be deterred from a mission. A pit bull will relax it’s mouth muscles just enough to get a stronger grip. I am made BOLDER by my detractors. Kamala Harris is a fraud,usurper,traitor and spy under 18USC and 10USC.
It is adorable that Laity thinks he's a pit bull on a mission.
:lol:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 33
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: Robert Laity v VP Kamala Harris

#75

Post by northland10 »

So, she is a traitor and a spy. Does he have a couple witnesses who watched Kamela give aid and comfort to the enemy? I'm sure he has read the constitution.

And who is she spying for? India, Jamaica? Being elected Vice President is not in the definition of spying.
101010 :towel:
Post Reply

Return to “Law and Lawsuits”