Trump's Classified Docs Theft: Mar-A-Lago, FBI Subpoenas, Searches & Seizures - DOJ, Garland, GOP Madness - Spy Hard

[Chilidog]

I thought Christina Bobb signed the daffydavit?

[Danraft]

Yes, it was Bobb who signed…
In another clip from above… “If they are going to indict Trump over some library books, they need to check their priorities” (loose quote)

[Greatgrey]

So when Cannon chopped up her orders after the 11th Circuit slap down, she was a tad sloppy.

Special Master Judge Dearie ain’t happy.

[Foggy]

Judge Cannon is the Foogy of federal judges.
She never gets anythign striagth.

[pipistrelle]

Tristan Snell
@TristanSnell
Stop saying the documents were "seized." That implies they belonged to Trump.

They were RECOVERED -- they were and are the property of the United States of America.
9:41 AM · Sep 27, 2022

THIS^^^

[AndyinPA]

[Greatgrey]

Judge Cannon is the Foogy of federal judges.
She never gets anythign striagth.

Well she certainly likes having do-overs.

[Danraft]

Yes, I took it as she was sloppy when she did the unconventional response to the appeal and just deleted all she thought was a problem.

Except, there was important content.
So, now she just does another do-over…

[andersweinstein]

[RTH10260]

[Kendra]

Jeebus. What a show.

[Greatgrey]

From the DOJ’s letter…

[keith]

https:/ /twitter.com/atrupar/status/1574752603623358465

On Newsmax, Trump lawyer Alina Habba is back to baselessly insinuating that FBI agents planted evidence at Mar-a-Lago

A couple more clips at the link.

Tell it to the Special Master Judge then.

[Luke]

For handy reference, put links to the dockets at the top of the first message in this topic.

DOCKETS:

Trump v. United States (9:22-cv-81294)
District Court, S.D. Florida (Loose Cannon): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64 ... overnment/

Original United States v. Sealed Search Warrant (9:22-mj-08332)
District Court, S.D. Florida https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64 ... er_by=desc

[Kendra]

Trump’s objections to Judge Dearie’s clear deadlines show that although he is the plaintiff who brought the lawsuit and shd thus want speed, he in effect is “quiet quitting” as he realizes nothing good is going to come of it—and in fact he is worse off having brought the suit.

[SuzieC]

I wonder if $3 million attorney Chris Kise advised Trump to dismiss the lawsuit, to avoid further litigation disasters. I would have.

[Foggy]

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

[Suranis]

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

Off Topic

Its been a thing for a while

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... =sack%20up

sack up

To gather up one's courage for a daunting task.
Sargeant Bohannon shrieked at Private Entwhistle, "Sack up, you panty-wearing dipstick...bayonet practice may save your life...now lunge, thrust, stick and twist...repeat...
by harry flashman July 29, 2003

This expression refers to a man's testicle sack, and is used to demand courage and action from another man. In long from it's equivalent to: Grab your sack to make sure your balls are there, be brave and do-it/buy-it/break-up/etc. In shorthand it's: Sack up and do it/buy-it/break-up/etc.
Democrat's need to sack up and stop the reckless, fear-driven war machine that the Neo-Republican party has sadly become.

Republican's need to sack up and admit that they are afraid of almost everything that is not white and Christian, and that their fear is why they want to drop bombs all the time.

Peggy Noonan in reference to Rush Limbaugh and other right wing pundits:

"But I would say of these men (why, in the continuing age of Bill Clinton, does the emoting come from the men?) who are fighting one another as they resist naming the cause for the fight: Sack up, get serious, define."
by Marko D February 8, 2008

[Foggy]

Off Topic

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

Tried that one on ol' Wifehorn before I left. Mistake.

She was all "Yeah? Do you have to wear a bra? No, you do not."

That lady is SO ANNOYING.

[Flatpoint High]

https://www.businessinsider.com/doj-no- ... ocs-2022-9

According to https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 121.0.pdf,new court documents filed Tuesday the DOJ is asking special master Raymond Dearie for an additional day to turn over non-classified documents in the investigation. Federal prosecutors said they needed until September 28 because none of the five vendors they suggested to digitize the cache of documents "were willing to be engaged by Plaintiff."

"Plaintiff informed us this morning that none of the five document-review vendors proposed by the government before last Tuesday's preliminary conference were willing to be engaged by Plaintiff," DOJ lawyers said in a filing on Tuesday. "To avoid further delay in the vendor's scanning and processing of the Seized Materials (defined to exclude "documents bearing classification markings"), the government issued a request for a task order this afternoon with a deadline of tomorrow (Wednesday, September 28, 2022) at noon.

[much ado]

Off Topic

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

Tried that one on ol' Wifehorn before I left. Mistake.

She was all "Yeah? Do you have to wear a bra? No, you do not."

That lady is SO ANNOYING.

Well, there are jilllstraps, also called just 'jills'.

Scroll down on this page https://www.icewarehouse.com/Womens_Jil ... ELVIC.html

[MsDaisy]

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

Try one of these.png (211.98 KiB) Viewed 825 times

I've personally given them up unless absolutely necessary.

[AndyinPA]

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

Try one of these.png

I've personally given them up unless absolutely necessary.

Try one of these--every day.

[Foggy]

Sorry for the threadjack.

So the five companies that refused to do business with Trump are my favorites now.

They didn't say "Well, we need payment up front."

They didn't propose a lot of silly provisions to try to make sure Trump wouldn't interfere and try to screw up the process.

They just flat said, "We don't do business with crooks" or sumpin' similar.

And that's smart, because the minute the company name was released, the Trump supporters would be making death threats and attempts to damage company property.

Don't join the war unless you are prepared to do battle.

[boogiebach]

Sorry for the threadjack.

So the five companies that refused to do business with Trump are my favorites now.

They didn't say "Well, we need payment up front."

They didn't propose a lot of silly provisions to try to make sure Trump wouldn't interfere and try to screw up the process.

They just flat said, "We don't do business with crooks" or sumpin' similar.

And that's smart, because the minute the company name was released, the Trump supporters would be making death threats and attempts to damage company property.

Don't join the war unless you are prepared to do battle.

But won't the company that contracts with the government face the same threats from maga types anyway?