raison de arizona wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:42 pm
Volkonski wrote: ↑Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:00 pm
Normal people don't fall to their knees before Trump.
Normal people don't storm the Capitol carrying a gun and zip ties either. That the judge wouldn't do the "terrorism enhancement" for him leads me to believe that we aren't going to see that for any of these folks.
To qualify for the terrorism enhancement under the federal sentencing guidelines, there has to be a “federal crime of terrorism.” As I understand it, those crimes are specifically identified in the guidelines, and it doesn’t appear that the judge believed Reffitt committed any of them. I don’t have an opinion one way or the other on the judge’s ruling, but I don’t believe he was charged with any of those crimes.
That’s not to say that others who, unlike Reffitt, entered the capital and damaged government property, might not earn the enhancement. Time will tell.
The federal crimes of terrorism are defined in the link under section (g)(5).
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USC ... c2332b.pdf
"Hey! We left this England place because it was bogus, and if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too!" -- Thomas Jefferson