trump (convicted felon, defamer, insurrectionist, contemnor, and rapist - $537M)

Abandon reality, all ye who enter here. *Democracy*Under*Threat*
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6493
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4751

Post by bob »

Graham's motion argues Speech & Debate Clause and legislative immunity.

Graham unsurprisingly argues that his calling Georgia was legitimate legislative activity relating to the Senate Judiciary Committee and certification of the electoral vote.

Graham claims he was just investigating and not attempting to influence. His evidence?: 'Cuz he said so.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4752

Post by Sam the Centipede »

Channeling my inner Mark Antony:
bob wrote: Wed Jul 13, 2022 3:22 pm Graham claims he was just investigating and not attempting to influence. His evidence?: 'Cuz he said so.
"And Brutus Graham is an honourable man."
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11283
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4753

Post by Kendra »

:cantlook:
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6897
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4754

Post by Suranis »

That stained pants is a fake pic.
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 8038
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4755

Post by pipistrelle »

Never heard of him. Assumed he’s same age as tfg. No. He’s younger than me. :eek:
User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 2159
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4756

Post by Chilidog »

pipistrelle wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:48 pm Never heard of him. Assumed he’s same age as tfg. No. He’s younger than me. :eek:
he’s a PGA pro who is a notorious alcoholic
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11283
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4757

Post by Kendra »

Suranis wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 1:46 pm That stained pants is a fake pic.
I was wondering about that.
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4758

Post by raison de arizona »

bob wrote: Wed Jul 13, 2022 3:22 pm Graham's motion argues Speech & Debate Clause and legislative immunity.

Graham unsurprisingly argues that his calling Georgia was legitimate legislative activity relating to the Senate Judiciary Committee and certification of the electoral vote.

Graham claims he was just investigating and not attempting to influence. His evidence?: 'Cuz he said so.
Imma hafta review the transcript of the call, if available, but were I a court, I think I would be reticent to wade into what is legitimate legislative activity relating to the Senate Judiciary Committee and what isn't. :twocents: As much as I want to see Graham eat it.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17330
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4759

Post by RTH10260 »

Federal officials to Donald Trump: Your political money numbers don't make sense

Madison Hall and Dave Levinthal
Jul 7, 2022, 7:51 PM
  • The Federal Election Commission issued a warning to a Trump-connected political action committee.
    The FEC said the Make America Great Again PAC made several mistakes in its most recent April quarterly report.
    Trump's campaign and political committees have faced numerous accusations of mistakes and wrongdoing.
.
A political action committee connected to former President Donald Trump is under increased scrutiny from federal officials because of apparent discrepancies in its financial disclosures.

According to a July 6 letter the Federal Election Commission sent the committee, Trump's Make America Great Again PAC made several mistakes in its first-quarter 2022 financial report, including discrepancies in its reported cash on hand in addition to calculation errors.

The Make America Great Again PAC, which until early 2021 operated as Trump's 2020 presidential-campaign committee, has until August 10, 2022, to respond to the FEC's letter and will not receive an extension. If the PAC fails to respond in time, the FEC said this could lead to an audit or "enforcement action."

As of March 31, the Make America Great Again PAC reported having about $5.5 million in available cash. It's one of several political committees within the post-presidency political operation of Trump, who continues to mull a run for president again in 2024.



https://www.businessinsider.com/donald- ... ion-2022-7
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4760

Post by raison de arizona »

Get a clue FEC, they're not mistakes.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6493
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4761

Post by bob »

raison de arizona wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:31 pmImma hafta review the transcript of the call, if available, but were I a court, I think I would be reticent to wade into what is legitimate legislative activity relating to the Senate Judiciary Committee and what isn't.
And that's basically Graham's point: "legitimate legislative activity" is broadly interpreted.

I could see a judge doing some petard hoisting: How is the judge to know if Graham was engaging in legitimate legislative activity or illegitimate election influencing? Maybe the judge will issue Graham a special, legally binding invitation, to tell his version of the story to a federal judge, all in an effort to avoid a special, legally binding invitation from a state grand jury.

But the more likely result is the judge reviewing the available evidence and quashing the subpoena.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12485
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4762

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4763

Post by Gregg »

bob wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 3:00 pm
raison de arizona wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:31 pmImma hafta review the transcript of the call, if available, but were I a court, I think I would be reticent to wade into what is legitimate legislative activity relating to the Senate Judiciary Committee and what isn't.
And that's basically Graham's point: "legitimate legislative activity" is broadly interpreted.

:snippity:
Well, they feel completely different when its a Democrat exercising legitimate legislative activity, they say that's why they don't have to answer those subpoena's because legitimate legislative activity doesn't include anything but actually passing laws.

Funny how that works, ain't it?
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6493
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4764

Post by bob »

Graham's motion has a brief shoutout:
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 140 S. Ct. 2019, 2031 (2020) (“Without information, Congress would be shooting in the dark, unable to legislate wisely or effectively. The congressional power to obtain information is broad and indispensable. (citations and quotations omitted)).
Although SCOTUS agreed requesting tax returns was a legitimate legislative purpose, requesting the president's had separation-of-powers concerns.

Graham will likely me-too that with "federalism concerns."
Image ImageImage
User avatar
keith
Posts: 4457
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:23 pm
Location: The Swamp in Victorian Oz
Occupation: Retired Computer Systems Analyst Project Manager Super Coder
Verified: ✅lunatic

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4765

Post by keith »

raison de arizona wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:39 pm Get a clue FEC, they're not mistakes.
I expect they know that.
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls Would scarcely get your feet wet
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 7535
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: The eff away from trump.
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4766

Post by Slim Cognito »

Is there a difference between asking authorities if anything seemed amiss versus asking authorities to change the outcome?
May the bridges I burn light my way.

ImageImageImage x5
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4767

Post by raison de arizona »

keith wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 6:05 pm
raison de arizona wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:39 pm Get a clue FEC, they're not mistakes.
I expect they know that.
The FEC is broken. 3Rs and 3Ds, and it takes 4 commissioners to do anything. I don't expect it occurred to the creators of the commission that half the commission would turn a blind eye to any wrongdoing by their own party.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6897
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4768

Post by Suranis »

raison de arizona wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 6:57 pm The FEC is broken. 3Rs and 3Ds, and it takes 4 commissioners to do anything. I don't expect it occurred to the creators of the commission that half the commission would turn a blind eye to any wrongdoing by their own party.
Ya. I remember first hearing about that deadlock in W Bush's time. The R's might as well be a single piece of paper.
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12485
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4769

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
Flatpoint High
Posts: 1694
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:58 am
Location: Hotel California, PH523, Galaxy Central, M103
Occupation: professional pain in the ass, voice actor & keeper of the straight face
Verified:

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4770

Post by Flatpoint High »

the Ghoulish Grift:
C8BA3DC2-2963-4860-8022-BC28B40E4A37.jpeg
C8BA3DC2-2963-4860-8022-BC28B40E4A37.jpeg (228 KiB) Viewed 865 times
castigat ridendo mores.
VELOCIUS QUAM ASPARAGI COQUANTUR
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4771

Post by Dr. Ken »

Her body isn't even cold and he's already grifting
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6493
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4772

Post by bob »

He may not remember their contentious divorce, and the mistress, but others do.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4773

Post by raison de arizona »

bob wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 8:44 pm He may not remember their contentious divorce, and the mistress, but others do.
Well, and there was that whole part where she said he raped her.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 8038
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4774

Post by pipistrelle »

That’s probably a template with a donate button baked in. Must be a way to turn it off.
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6897
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: trump (the former guy)

#4775

Post by Suranis »

pipistrelle wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:05 pm That’s probably a template with a donate button baked in. Must be a way to turn it off.
Easy to do, if you are told to. Its literally "Delete a line of code. Done"
Hic sunt dracones
Post Reply

Return to “The Big Lie & Aftermath of The Former Guy”