US v Peter Navarro

Post Reply
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17395
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#101

Post by RTH10260 »

His lawyers know something that the other lawyers in contempt cases re J6 did not know?
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4152
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#102

Post by Phoenix520 »

ME ME ME LOOK AT MEEEEEE
WHEEEEEE
LOOK AT MEEEEEE!
I know I’m tiny but you can still see me… can’t you? WELL, CAN’T YOU!?!
User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 10:48 pm
Location: Asgard
Occupation: Aspiring Novelist
Verified:
Contact:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#103

Post by Kriselda Gray »

raison de arizona wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:33 am Navarro’s attorneys want to delay trial due to his upcoming book publicity tour. Trial date set for November 17th.
I hope the prosecutors object to that. It sounds like a nifty way for him to convince everyone he's innocent before anyone gets the chance to make the case he's not. I know it wouldn't be jury tampering in the legal sense, but it could easily have a similar effect...
User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 10:48 pm
Location: Asgard
Occupation: Aspiring Novelist
Verified:
Contact:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#104

Post by Kriselda Gray »

Kendra wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:37 am
raison de arizona wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:33 am Navarro’s attorneys want to delay trial due to his upcoming book publicity tour. Trial date set for November 17th.
:?: How many times can he do the same book spin on Fox, Newsmax, etc? He shirley won't go on CNN/MSNBC/ABC, etc.?
He seems to enjoy talking to Ari on MSNBC...
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#105

Post by raison de arizona »

And why this is bad news for Peter Navarro...
Elie Mystal @ElieNYC wrote: Good lord, we have Vega v. Tekoh. The Supreme Court just gutted Miranda, ruling that a person who did NOT receive the warning has NO RIGHT to sue the government for the constitutional violation.

6-3. By the people you'd expect. Jesus Christ.

Folks, this basically overturns "the right to remain silent." It means that you can't sue the state if a cop fails to tell you your rights.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#106

Post by bob »

With due respect for Mystal, that's a bit of a reach.

The statements are still inadmissible in court; Miranda remains intact.

Vega v. Tekoh, however, essentially will incentivize bad-faith omissions of the warnings, as in some instances the officer's goal isn't to win in court, but to inflict punishment by gearing up the criminal justice system to target a person without sufficient means to defend in court.

But, yes, this ruling will make it more difficult for Navarro to sue the officers to whom he spoke. Not like such a suit was going to win before today's ruling.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#107

Post by Kendra »

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17395
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#108

Post by RTH10260 »

"There’s a sucker born every minute” — P.T. Barnum
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#109

Post by Gregg »

Too bad its only the rich and famous who get to crowdfund their legal defense when they get into trouble.

Poor people charged with crimes should sure use that.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 8049
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#110

Post by pipistrelle »

Are we fascist bastards or communist bastards or socialist bastards or what? I can’t keep it straight.
User avatar
tek
Posts: 2409
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:15 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#111

Post by tek »

"fascist bastards" are his buddies. Projection all around.
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#112

Post by Gregg »

I'm a Socialist but I know who my daddy was. :mrgreen:
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#113

Post by Kendra »

:crazy:


Navarro: The reason why I think the Pence is guilty of treason to at least Trump and perhaps in this country is that he acted on the basis of a flawed legal opinion
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17395
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#114

Post by RTH10260 »

:confuzzled: :think: "treason to at least T"

Doesn't he know that treason applies against the US, the country, only?

:confuzzled: :think: "that he acted on the basis of a flawed legal opinion"

The laws of the land are now flawed opinion?
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#115

Post by Gregg »

James Madison wrote:Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6517
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#116

Post by bob »

Remember when he whined that the police didn't sufficiently tell him about his privilege to STFU?
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6682
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#117

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:49 pm Remember when he whined that the police didn't sufficiently tell him about his privilege to STFU?
I envision one of them saying... "you have a right to remain silent.. use it, dammit."
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#118

Post by Kendra »



Send money.
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 8049
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#119

Post by pipistrelle »

Kendra wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:39 am

Send money.
Recently I gave to Ukraine, a local cat thing, a local dog thing, a raptor rehab place, and the internet archive. Please make a case for why a wealthy guy’s legal defense grift is as worthy. I’ll wait.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#120

Post by Kendra »

Oh dear, I went to the grifting site, it's worth it at least to read his about me :callonme: :callonme: :callonme:

I has a sad, maybe I'll pull my monthly $25 donation to Purrfect pals and send it to Peter instead. Nah.
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4152
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#121

Post by Phoenix520 »

Off Topic
is that FosterDadJohn’s place?
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#122

Post by Kendra »

Phoenix520 wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:59 am
Off Topic
is that FosterDadJohn’s place?
Yes.
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4152
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#123

Post by Phoenix520 »

The hours I’ve spent watching him roll around on the floor with those babies…
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#124

Post by Kendra »

Phoenix520 wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:06 am The hours I’ve spent watching him roll around on the floor with those babies…
Off Topic
Me too.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 11307
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#125

Post by Kendra »


ALERT: US Justice Dept made plea agreement offer to Peter Navarro in Contempt of Congress case

Offer -- rejected
Post Reply

Return to “The January 6 Insurrection, including Criminal Cases”