US v Peter Navarro

[Dave from down under]

Ah…

But if he had repeated that…

Wouldn’t the repeating have broken his silence???

[Gregg]

Peter Navarro is trying to prove Mike Lindell isn't the dumbest defendant in history.

[New Turtle]

I bet for his arraignment he will attempt to try his case.

[Dr. Caligari]

Navarro's argument is apparently that they told him his rights without explicitly reading them from a card, which Navarro considers as possibly a violation of the fourth amendment.

IANAL, but I'm pretty sure the requirement is to advise the party of their rights, not to explicitly read them off a card. But what do I know?

Notably, the Miranda rights need not be read in any particular order, and they need not precisely match the language of the Miranda case as long as they are adequately and fully conveyed (California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981)).

Too, also, Miranda is based on the 5th Amendment, not 4th.

[Dr. Caligari]

Too, also, Miranda is based on the 5th Amendment, not 4th.

Ninja'd by bob.

[northland10]

I wonder if those arresting him were considering helping him exercise his right to remain silent, with duct tape.

[Luke]

*** REMINDER ***

To call in & laugh at @RealPNavarro 's Arraignment:
HEARING as to PETER K. NAVARRO: Arraignment & Status Conference set for 6/17/2022 at 10:00AM before Judge Mehta. Public access line (877) 848-7030, access code 321-8747.

[Greatgrey]

He finally Lawyered Up!

[raison de arizona]

They’re dropping his lawsuit against Pelosi that he apparently hasn’t served her with yet.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 57.5.0.pdf

[Luke]

Awww that was such a slam dunk suit against Pelosi. Those cowards. Here are Pete's new amigos and since Pete is so chill & focused he must be a pleasure as a client.

Rowley was at Baker but several other firms are on his search results page. Appears he may have his own firm now.

John P Rowley Law Pllc http://jprowleylaw.com
Welcome to JPRowley Law PLLC. Representing companies and individuals in complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense.

Mr. John P. Rowley III
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
John P. Rowley III is a partner in the Baker & McKenzie's North America Litigation and Corporate Compliance & Risk Management Practice Groups, and a member of the Firm’s Investigations and Business Crimes Group. Mr. Rowley attended the University of Richmond Law School, where he was a member of the Law Review. After graduating in 1980, he served as law clerk at the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Mr. Rowley is a former assistant US attorney and office supervisor for the Eastern District of Virginia, and has handled complex civil disputes and white collar criminal investigations for over 25 years. He is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried numerous jury cases to verdict in federal and state court. Prior to joining the Firm, Mr. Rowley served as staff director for the congressionally-mandated US Department of Defense (DoD) panel which reviewed sexual misconduct allegations at the US Air Force Academy, and played an important role in the panel’s report to the Secretary of Defense and the House and Senate Armed Services Committees.

John S. Irving, IV
Partner, Earth & Water Law

John Irving joined Earth & Water Law as a Partner in March 2021, where his practice focuses on defending clients in enforcement actions, conducting confidential internal investigations, and ensuring the effectiveness of corporate compliance programs. Mr. Irving recently served as Deputy Assistant Administrator in EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA), which coordinates and oversees nationwide compliance efforts and administrative, civil, and criminal environmental investigations under the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and other environmental statutes. Prior to joining EPA in 2019, Mr. Irving was a Partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Holland & Knight LLP, where he practiced for twelve years focusing on internal investigations, compliance, and white collar criminal defense – often in the context of environmental laws, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, congressional investigations, and the civil False Claims Act. Mr. Irving’s prior experience also includes a decade with the Department of Justice as an Assistant United States Attorney in Washington, D.C., as Counsel to two Deputies Attorney General, and as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for the Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. Mr. Irving also served as Investigative Counsel to the Government Reform & Oversight Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, as Special Impeachment Counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, and in the Office of Independent Counsel.

FedSoc bio https://fedsoc.org/contributors/john-irving-2

Pete is really missing out, it all happened so fast... if he'd have asked us, we could have hooked him up with Orly Taitz, he needs a civil rights decedent in this matter.

[Kendra]

Peter Navarro had arrived to DC federal court for his arraignment today on two charges of contempt of Congress,
@psmolinski
reports. Navarro didn’t answer questions, but told the press, “All will be revealed.”

[Volkonski]

[raison de arizona]

Navarro’s attorneys want to delay trial due to his upcoming book publicity tour. Trial date set for November 17th.

[Kendra]

Navarro’s attorneys want to delay trial due to his upcoming book publicity tour. Trial date set for November 17th.

How many times can he do the same book spin on Fox, Newsmax, etc? He shirley won't go on CNN/MSNBC/ABC, etc.?

Navarro's attorney wants to slow down the trial schedule after Mehta suggests he has availbility in lat August, early September or mid-November.

But Navarro's team says Navarro is planning to put out a book in September and will be on the road a lot.

Navarro's attorney, John Irving, says the book marketing is important to Navarro's livelihood. DOJ wants to move quickly, but Mehta says if the trial isn't this year, the earliest he can do is April.

DOJ has "serious concerns about delaying trial for a book tour."

Can't Navarro just move up the publishing date so he's got time for the big tour?

[raison de arizona]

Navarro’s attorneys want to delay trial due to his upcoming book publicity tour. Trial date set for November 17th.

How many times can he do the same book spin on Fox, Newsmax, etc? He shirley won't go on CNN/MSNBC/ABC, etc.?

https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/ ... 6685879296

Navarro's attorney wants to slow down the trial schedule after Mehta suggests he has availbility in lat August, early September or mid-November.

But Navarro's team says Navarro is planning to put out a book in September and will be on the road a lot.

Navarro's attorney, John Irving, says the book marketing is important to Navarro's livelihood. DOJ wants to move quickly, but Mehta says if the trial isn't this year, the earliest he can do is April.

DOJ has "serious concerns about delaying trial for a book tour."

Can't Navarro just move up the publishing date so he's got time for the big tour?

Reports are they said with straight faces that Navarro would be on book tour from August through at least the end of the year, and as such unavailable.

[Kendra]

Just running out the clock, then.

[Tiredretiredlawyer]

I would NOT want to be the attorney telling a federal judge my client couldn't talk to the J6 Committee and now can't "do" trial about not talking to the J6 Committee because of his book tour about J6. That's a mighty twisted pretzel even for a criminal trial lawyer.

[Kendra]

[raison de arizona]

For sometime who refuses to talk, Navarro sure does seem to do an awful lot of talking.

[Suranis]

Hmmmmmmmmmm....

[Tiredretiredlawyer]

November 17 is on my calendar!

[Kendra]

Peter Navarro's lawyer just now:

"They put him in hand cuffs, they put him in leg irons, I can tell you ladies and gentlemen that does not typically happen to career criminals"

[Gregg]

"They put him in hand cuffs, they put him in leg irons, I can tell you ladies and gentlemen that does not typically happen to career criminals"

Well, not white guys maybe, but.... Non violent protester, no criminal record

[Slim Cognito]

Peter Navarro's lawyer just now:

"They put him in hand cuffs, they put him in leg irons, I can tell you ladies and gentlemen that does not typically happen to career criminals"

Is he telling me they only did it to this career criminal?

[Kendra]

Some like
@CBSpolitics
MISREPORTING key aspect of case. My attorneys dismissed civil suit SIMPLY as procedural matter. Attorney made clear suit will be evaluated within context of broader case. Read KEY issues at: https://peternavarro.com/peter-sues-pel ... roo-jan-6/