Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
Somebody I keep confusing with right-wing gadfly and, I think, birther William Olson.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 1:51 pmLawyer subject to discipline in AZ debacle: https://azmirror.com/briefs/state-bar-g ... attorneys/
The Brunsons aren't attorneys, and represented themselves.
True, though I was using it as an example of attorney or pro SE, the whack-a-doodles get through.
It's an appeal of the loser Mark Finchem Kari Lake case.Lindell Offense Fund
Dear Friend,
BREAKING: OUR CASE IS HEADING TO THE SUPREME COURT!
We are not ever giving up. You and I have come so far in a short amount of time and your support has brought us to this moment!
ON MARCH 15TH, WE WILL BE ON THE STEPS OF THE SUPREME COURT!
The attorneys LOF will be petitioning SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari in the Lake vs. Fontes case. You will be able to watch the March 15th press conference LIVE on FRANKSPEECH.
Now we have been given the open door to present our case to the Supreme Court. You will remember that plaintiffs Kari Lake and Mark Finchem brought a case to the Arizona courts to end the machines, they were told they had no standing. The attorneys appealed, and the case was held up so that we can now go to the highest court in the land.
As stated by Lake’s councel at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
A key portion of the court’s order incorrectly rejecting our claims regarding electronic voting machines and the actual harm done during the 2022 AZ elections is below:
Case 2
We know that the evidence already presented met the above qualifications- the court even accepted the Factual allegations of the operative complaint as TRUE- then said we still didn’t have standing to sue. So now:
We are presenting EVEN MORE EVIDENCE TO SCOTUS!
THIS EVIDENCE HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE!
IT IS SO EXPLOSIVE, I BELIEVE IT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING!
This is what we have SO patiently been waiting for! The evidence we are presenting has never been seen and it is so explosive I believe it is going to be the final straw to end machine interference in our elections.
Just this past week, our great real President was put back on the ballot by the Supreme Court judgment of 9-0. I believe we will see another 9-0 vote and it will be a HUGE step towards saving our country.
We told you we would not stop, we would not give up and we would not surrender. No matter how much lawfare, cancellation, intimidation, WE ARE NEVER GOING TO STOP fighting for our country!
This lawsuit is supported by the Lindell Legal Offense Fund. We are all in. Our country is being attacked by open borders, radical socialist policies and gender ideology being pushed on our kids! Did you vote for this?
We are accruing massive expenses for this effort!
We have a very short amount of time to pull the needed funds together! Please join us today!
URGENT: This is one of the MOST important lawsuits ever to save our country and the costs are massive to fund the attorneys and experts we have working on this RIGHT NOW! YOU ARE NEEDED TODAY! We have no doubt that this will catapult the efforts to get rid of the electronic voting machines IN A BIG WAY! Do not give up! Keep fighting, we are going to win!
>> Donate $250 to the Lindell Legal Offense Fund <<
>> Donate $500 to the Lindell Legal Offense Fund <<
>> Donate $1000 to the Lindell Legal Offense Fund <<
>> Donate $2500 to the Lindell Legal Offense Fund <<
The time to act is now. Stand with us and let’s win together!
God bless, Mike Lindell
Lindell Offense Fund
1. SCOTUS doesn't hear "more" evidence (it reviews the lower courts' rulings); andThe attorneys LOF will be petitioning SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari in the Lake vs. Fontes case.
* * *
You will remember that plaintiffs Kari Lake and Mark Finchem brought a case to the Arizona courts to end the machines, they were told they had no standing.
* * *
We are presenting EVEN MORE EVIDENCE TO SCOTUS!
The attorneys LOF will be petitioning SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari in the Lake vs. Fontes
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/ap ... 10-16.htmlJustia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Ninth Circuit › 2023 › KARI LAKE, ET AL V. ADRIAN FONTES, ET AL
KARI LAKE, ET AL V. ADRIAN FONTES, ET AL, No. 22-16413 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary
Kari Lake and Mark Finchem (“Plaintiffs”), the Republican nominees for Governor and Secretary of State of Arizona, filed this action before the 2022 general election, contending that Arizona’s use of electronic tabulation systems violated the federal Constitution. The district court dismissed their operative first amended complaint for lack of Article III standing. Lake v. Hobbs. Plaintiffs’ candidacies failed at the polls, and their various attempts to overturn the election outcome in state court have to date been unavailing. On appeal, they no longer seek any relief concerning the 2022 election but instead seek to bar use of electronic tabulation systems in future Arizona elections.
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the district court that Plaintiffs’ “speculative allegations that voting machines may be hackable are insufficient to establish an injury in fact under Article III. The court explained that even assuming Plaintiffs could continue to claim standing as prospective voters in future elections, they had not alleged a particularized injury and therefore failed to establish the kind of injury Article III requires. None of Plaintiffs’ allegations supported a plausible inference that their individual votes in future elections will be adversely affected by the use of electronic tabulation, particularly given the robust safeguards in Arizona law, the use of paper ballots, and the post-tabulation retention of those ballots. The panel concluded that speculative allegations that voting machines may be hackable were insufficient to establish an injury, in fact, under Article III.
The panel held that because Plaintiffs are no longer nominated candidates for state office and no longer seek relief related to the 2022 election, they likely now lacked standing on that ground. But even assuming Plaintiffs could continue to claim standing as prospective voters in future elections, they had not alleged a particularized injury and therefore failed to establish the kind of injury Article III requires. None of Plaintiffs’ allegations supported a plausible inference that their individual votes in future elections will be adversely affected by the use of electronic tabulation, particularly given the robust safeguards in Arizona law, the use of paper ballots, and the post-tabulation retention of those ballots. The panel concluded that speculative allegations that voting machines may be hackable were insufficient to establish an injury in fact under Article III.
In the Supreme Court of the United States
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 13(5), Kari Lake and Mark Finchem ("Applicants") hereby respectfullyhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... cation.pdfapply for an extension of 30 days—to and including February 15, 2024—of the time within which to petition for a writ of certiorari
Date Proceedings and Orders
Jan 03 2024 Application (23A622) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 14, 2024 to February 15, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main Document
Jan 05 2024 Application (23A622) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 15, 2024.
Feb 01 2024 Application (23A622) to extend further the time from February 15, 2024 to March 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Written Request
Feb 05 2024 Application (23A622) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 14, 2024
Attorneys for Petitioners
Lawrence J. Joseph
Counsel of Record Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph
1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 700-1A
Washington, DC 20036
LJOSEPH@LARRYJOSEPH.COM 2023559452
Party name: Kari Lake, et al.
Also. Too. As I posted above, the extension they were granted to file is until MARCH 14, 2024.bob wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:44 pm1. SCOTUS doesn't hear "more" evidence (it reviews the lower courts' rulings); andThe attorneys LOF will be petitioning SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari in the Lake vs. Fontes case.
* * *
You will remember that plaintiffs Kari Lake and Mark Finchem brought a case to the Arizona courts to end the machines, they were told they had no standing.
* * *
We are presenting EVEN MORE EVIDENCE TO SCOTUS!
2. NO STANDING. It doesn't how much evidence you claim to have because no standing means no jurisdiction to hear your dump truck of evidence.
P.S.: Send money.
Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
Mike Lindell’s lawyers have convinced him that appearing on the steps of the Supreme Court on Friday to present his explosive new evidence is a bad idea, so they will file it electronically and he will not go to DC.
Every time his lawyers told him that using Montgomery's BS will give Dominion another win in their suit.pipistrelle wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:30 pm How many times has no one seen his “explosive new evidence”?
Whistleblower of fallen Navy SEAL @realtinapeters @Orly_licious 59sIn a truly Klayman-esque move, after seeking and receiving an extension to file their cert. petition, Lake and Finchem now move to expedite.
IANAL, but in my mind, I can come up with 60(b) reasons why you do not introduce new evidence to SCOTUS.bob wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:42 pmIn a truly Klayman-esque move, after seeking and receiving an extension to file their cert. petition, Lake and Finchem now move to expedite.
Time’s up, MF.MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 1:37 pm
Tony Webster
@webster
Federal judge, upholding arbitration ruling, orders Mike Lindell’s company to pay @bob_zeidman
$5 million plus interest. Zeidman had taken on Lindell’s “Prove Mike Wrong” voter fraud challenge.Big Cases Bot
@big_cases
Automated
New filing: "Zeidman v. Lindell (My Pillow founder bet debt)"
Doc #45: Order on Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award AND Order on Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award
PDF: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 5.45.0.pdf
A landlord for one of MyPillow's manufacturing facilities has asked a judge to evict the Minnesota-based pillow giant from the premises, saying the company has failed to pay more than $200,000 in rent over the past two months
MyPillow, headquartered in Chaska, has received at least four default notices since September at the Shakopee warehouse, according to court filings. The latest eviction notice says the company is behind in payments for February and March, owing Delaware-based First Industrial, L.P. more than $217,000 for rent and other charges for the facility located at 4701 Valley Boulevard South.
"MyPillow has more or less vacated but we'd like to do this by the book," Attorney Sara Filo, representing First Industrial, said in a hearing in eviction court Tuesday. "At this point there's a representation that no further payment is going to be made under this lease, so we'd like to go ahead with finding a new tenant."
Scott County Chief Judge Caroline Lennon said the court would issue the order as soon as it's submitted. MyPillow is still currently leasing a second manufacturing warehouse and outlet location in Shakopee.