CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 35172
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#1

Post by realist »

I started to do this when I first saw the Complaint this morning.

So... Have at it. When/if I have some time later or tomorrow I'll try to move some of the posts over from the Bundy Trial thread. Or maybe Foggy will have some time early in the morning too. Also.

Complaint
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
GlimDropper
Posts: 1467
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:35 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#2

Post by GlimDropper »

GIL Strikes Back:
The Oath with SSG Moe
3 hrs ·

Update from Deb:

TODAY'S BIG NEWS -- CLIVEN BUNDY'S ATTORNEY RESPECTFULLY ASK JUDGE GLORIA NAVARRO TO RECUSE HERSELF FROM CASE-
ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 9171
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#3

Post by Northland10 »

GlimDropper wrote:GIL Strikes Back:
CLIVEN BUNDY'S ATTORNEY RESPECTFULLY ASK...
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2944
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#4

Post by woodworker »

I think that Justice Kagan or Justice Sotomayor should take a sabbatical from SCOTUS over the summer and hear this case.
bring out the tumbrils -- lots of them.

User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 14397
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#5

Post by Dolly »

Update my prior post. :oops:
This site lists more judges than Wiki did.
Don't know who appointed all of them. :madguy:
links for each judge below.
http://www.nvd.uscourts.gov/JudgeList.aspx

ETA: GAH! STUPID WIKIPEDIA. 1st post below..
Yes, it is Wikipedia.

United States District Court for the District of Nevada
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... _of_Nevada

According to this, there are 7 judges. One position is vacant. Of the six active judges, FIVE have been appointed by Obama.

James C. Mahan was appointed by G.W. Bush in 2002.
James C. Mahan
....
In 2006, Mahan was investigated by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals after it became known that he had awarded a total of nearly $5 million in court awards and fees to individuals with whom he had personal and business relationships.[1] These individuals included his formal judicial campaign treasurer as well as a former law partner, who was at that time providing free legal services to Mahan's wife and Mahan's judicial assistant.[2] The relationships were uncovered by the Los Angeles Times and were not disclosed by Mahan, who denied wrongdoing.[3]
....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_C._Mahan
Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31131
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#6

Post by mimi »

The Review Journal story was updated to include a quote from Reid spokesperson:
Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman issued a statement late Tuesday responding to Bundy’s lawsuit.

“It is hardly surprising that Cliven Bundy, a man who has been breaking federal law for decades, would file a baseless and absurd lawsuit,” Orthman said. “Bundy, his sons and their believers have endangered the lives of federal officers, have defaced and damaged public lands and squandered public resources for their own benefit.

“They are domestic terrorists,” Orthman added. “They are deadly and dangerous and will be brought to justice.”
:boxing:

http://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/cliv ... _refQuery=

User avatar
Butterfly Bilderberg
Posts: 7654
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:26 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#7

Post by Butterfly Bilderberg »

Jonathan Skipper Speece posted on FB:
... The complaint can be found at http://www.larryklayman.com.

:snippity:

Cliven Bundy's attorneys will discuss the complaint following the hearing at 10:00 a.m. on the courthouse steps.

"Pity the nation that acclaims the bully as hero,
and that deems the glittering conqueror bountiful."
- Kahlil Gibran, The Garden of The Prophet

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 10270
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#8

Post by GreatGrey »

bob wrote:
fierceredpanda wrote:And do we really need another thread for a lawsuit that won't make it past a motion to dismiss drafted entirely by 1Ls in their first semester? Seems like rather more than it's worth, to be honest. Although I'll retract that if the judge actually does hammer Hansen with Rule 11 sanctions.
Do not underestimate the Klayman's ability to unnecessarily multiply the proceedings!
Please, please, please, some of these...
I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 10551
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#9

Post by Mikedunford »

Still no sign of it in PACER.
"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 46704
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#10

Post by Sterngard Friegen »

United States District Court
District of Nevada (Las Vegas)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:16-cv-01047-JAD-GWF

Bundy v. Obama et al
Assigned to: Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Referred to: Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr
Demand: $50,000,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Date Filed: 05/10/2016
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Cliven Bundy represented by Joel F. Hansen
Hansen Rasmussen
1835 Village Center Circle
Las Vegas, NV 89134
702-385-5533
Fax: 702-382-8891
Email: lisab@hrnvlaw.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Barack Obama
Defendant
Gloria Navarro
Defendant
Harry Reid
Defendant
Rory Reid

Date Filed # Docket Text
05/10/2016 1[RECAP] COMPLAINT for Violation of Constitutional Rights against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-4112227), filed by Cliven Bundy. Proof of service due by 8/8/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3)(Hansen, Joel)

NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (Entered: 05/10/2016)
05/10/2016 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Cliven Bundy that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. . (Hansen, Joel) (Entered: 05/10/2016)
05/10/2016 Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (AR) (Entered: 05/10/2016)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Mikedunford
Posts: 10551
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:42 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#11

Post by Mikedunford »

Out of an overabundance of caution, I just spent a dime and re-ran the exact same PACER search I ran right before my last post. To my great relief, I am not completely incompetent; the case showed up in the system in the last hour and a half.
"I don't give a fuck whether we're peers or not."
--Lord Thomas Henry Bingham to Boris Johnson, on being asked whether he would miss being in "the best club in London" if the Law Lords moved from Parliament to a Supreme Court.

User avatar
tek
Posts: 4327
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Lake Humidity, FL
Occupation: Damned if I know

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#12

Post by tek »

nothing says "knucklehead" quite like a fifty billion dollar demand.
There's no way back
from there to here

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 16249
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#13

Post by Reality Check »

You'll never guess who appointed Judge Dorsey. :-
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

User avatar
Hektor
Posts: 2951
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Soviet Canukistan
Contact:

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#14

Post by Hektor »

So is the next move after this to sue Judge Dorsey when she grants a motion to dismiss? Or remove the case from Federal court to state court? No, wait, it's "Send Money!" and me! me! me!

User avatar
aiiPancho
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:54 pm
Location: mom's basement
Occupation: always the new guy

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#15

Post by aiiPancho »

tek wrote:nothing says "knucklehead" quite like a fifty billion dollar demand.
I read fifty million from the Navarro Gang. But yeah, "knucklehead."

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 9171
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#16

Post by Northland10 »

Has GIL requested PHV status yet?

I do wonder if this was a roll of the dice hoping to get it assigned to a certain former Chief Judge on senior status.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 16249
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#17

Post by Reality Check »

Reality Check wrote:You'll never guess who appointed Judge Dorsey. :-
ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW
Bend over Cliven. :rotflmao:
"“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”

Heather Heyer, November 2016

chancery
Posts: 1640
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#18

Post by chancery »

Northland10 wrote:
I do wonder if this was a roll of the dice hoping to get it assigned to a certain former Chief Judge on senior status.
That would have been interesting, and potentially ugly. Judge Jones is an anti-government nut.

But GIL's attack on Judge Navarro is so blatantly improper that I suspect that Judge Jones would have done the right thing. Even nutty judges done't like this kind of behavior. And even if if Jones had been assigned and was tempted to misbehave, the Ninth Circuit has his number, and he knows it.

If Judge Jones had been assigned to the Bundy-Nevada indictments it would have been a real disaster.

User avatar
tek
Posts: 4327
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Lake Humidity, FL
Occupation: Damned if I know

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#19

Post by tek »

aiiPancho wrote:
tek wrote:nothing says "knucklehead" quite like a fifty billion dollar demand.
I read fifty million from the Navarro Gang. But yeah, "knucklehead."
Bundy v. Obama et al
Assigned to: Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Referred to: Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr
Demand: $50,000,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Date Filed: 05/10/2016
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Then again, maybe they just don't know how many zeros make a million..
There's no way back
from there to here

User avatar
spiduh
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:00 pm
Location: Zuckerman farm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#20

Post by spiduh »

tek wrote:
aiiPancho wrote:
tek wrote:nothing says "knucklehead" quite like a fifty billion dollar demand.
I read fifty million from the Navarro Gang. But yeah, "knucklehead."
Bundy v. Obama et al
Assigned to: Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Referred to: Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr
Demand: $50,000,000,000
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Date Filed: 05/10/2016
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Then again, maybe they just don't know how many zeros make a million..
#62 inside the complaint says "$50,000,000". Somebunny screwed it up somewhere. :confused:
“If they kill me, grab my phone.” –Ammon Bundy (Reuters)
"Yes, I Did Turn the Flying Monkeys Loose!" -Anna von Reitz (FB)
"I 'Self Identify' as a female" -Jon Ritzheimer (FB)

User avatar
Karen Walker
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:31 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#21

Post by Karen Walker »

Yr Wonkette has blessed us with their thoughts.
Cliven Bundy Lawsuit Against Obama Demands $50 Million, Get Out Of Jail Free Card, And A Pony

Welfare rancher and dipshit militia icon Cliven Bundy upped his legal game Tuesday, filing a lawsuit naming Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro, the federal judge in his Nevada criminal case, as defendants. Among other things, Bundy wants immediate release from prison, all charges against him dropped, $50 million in damages, and perhaps a shrubbery. At the very least, Bundy wants to be represented by wingnut lawyer (and Wonkette frenemy) Larry Klayman, and to have Navarro removed from the case because she’s incredibly biased against him:

Read more at http://wonkette.com/601664/cliven-bundy ... Gfhfu3M.99

User avatar
aiiPancho
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:54 pm
Location: mom's basement
Occupation: always the new guy

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#22

Post by aiiPancho »

Gah. I just sped down to what I thought was the bottom line (62). Thank you, all. :oops:

User avatar
spiduh
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:00 pm
Location: Zuckerman farm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#23

Post by spiduh »

Pics from the presser yesterday.
ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW
Looks like more press than patriots.
ABBC3_SPOILER_SHOW
A few more pics here:
“If they kill me, grab my phone.” –Ammon Bundy (Reuters)
"Yes, I Did Turn the Flying Monkeys Loose!" -Anna von Reitz (FB)
"I 'Self Identify' as a female" -Jon Ritzheimer (FB)

User avatar
phaseolus
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:17 pm
Location: Bay View, WI
Occupation: PLC Programmer

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#24

Post by phaseolus »

spiduh wrote: :snippity:
#62 inside the complaint says "$50,000,000". Somebunny screwed it up somewhere. :confused:
Not the only error in that thing. I only skimmed it, but I noticed they got the year wrong when they cited Obama's joke and I sorta remember seeing at least one dumb spelling mistake, too.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 28470
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.

#25

Post by bob »

As Wonkette notes, Obama nominated Dorsey ... on Reid's recommendation.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Bundy Ranch/Malheur NWR”