Orly's latest poopies.....

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27223
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53651

Post by bob » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:53 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:24 pm
Will RCP respond with a math lesson?
Sorta?:
GURU POLLING AVERAGES site continues showing bogus averages to show a bogus lead for Biden! In reality, Warren and Harris are in a statistical tie with him and Trump beats both Harris and Warren

In the first primary state of New Hampshire the latest polls show a statistical tie. Most polls have 4-5% margin of error and the polls are 3% and 5%, which means it is a 4% average or a statistical tie.

The Guru of statistics and polling, RealClearPolitics.com added to the average an old outdated poll from May-June when Biden had a 13% lead and shows a bogus average of 8.3%. By the way, even if you were to add 13 to 5 and 3, the average would have been 7%, not 8.3%.

It appears, polling gurus do not want the public to see that it is a statistical tie, the Warren and Harris are rising and are expected to surpass Biden soon and both of them are not doing well against Trump. According to Rasmussen, most accurate pollster in 2016 election, Trump is beating both Warren and Harris
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/guru-pollin ... nd-warren/ :twisted:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27223
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53652

Post by bob » Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:01 pm



Wake me when Taitz claims that Omar has Harry Bounel's SSN.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45088
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53653

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:22 pm

The Chaleria has been here for decades and still can't write a coherent sentence in English. How she passed the California Bar remains a mystery to me.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12868
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53654

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sun Jul 21, 2019 11:06 pm

Moldavans in glass houses shouldn't cast stones.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16089
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53655

Post by ZekeB » Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:11 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:22 pm
The Chaleria has been here for decades and still can't write a coherent sentence in English. How she passed the California Bar remains a mystery to me.
Send her back!

Melania too...
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

User avatar
sad-cafe
Posts: 965
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 7:32 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53656

Post by sad-cafe » Mon Jul 22, 2019 4:50 pm

she is a hateful old broad trying to keep her 15 minutes that expired in 2008

User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 14320
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53657

Post by Dolly » Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:35 pm

:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/the-post-sa ... apons-now/ :twisted:
The Post says: Ban assault weapons now. This is not left leaning NY Times or Wash Post. This is a conservative NY Post calling for an executive action to ban assault weapons such as AK 47 or AR 15
Posted on | August 4, 2019 | 2 Comments

The Post says: Ban assault weapons now
Two mass shootings within 24 hours in El Paso and Dayton, days after the Garlic Festival killings. Three months after Virginia Beach, six months after Aurora, …
New York Post40 minutes ago



Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
@DrOrlyTaitzEsq
·
39s

@realDonaldTrump
Time for an executive action to ban the assault weapons such as AK 47 and AR 15. Most American citizens and voters will support you on this
Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

TexasFilly
Posts: 18462
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53658

Post by TexasFilly » Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:02 pm

The nitrous huffing has finally gotten to her.

Or, more likely, she's worried about her own "small children."
I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8528
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53659

Post by Northland10 » Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:03 pm

I could imagine the screaming if Obama tried to ban weapons by "executive action."
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45088
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53660

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:11 pm

Even when Taitz is right she's wrong. An executive order isn't legal and the end doesn't justify the means.

noblepa
Posts: 1072
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Network Engineer

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53661

Post by noblepa » Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:39 am

Northland10 wrote:
Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:03 pm
I could imagine the screaming if Obama tried to ban weapons by "executive action."
During Obama's tenure, there was reportedly a shortage of ammunition, because many gun nuts were absolutely convinced that BHO was going to come for their guns. Obama never did any such thing. He did issue an executive order tightening some regulation on background checks, as were already in the law, but that's about it.

Trump, on the other hand, has banned bump stocks by executive order. My brother is into guns and has two fully automatic rifles, a .30 caliber tripod mounted weapon and an M-16. He told me that it was all in the way ATF defined "automatic" and "semi-automatic". ATF previously defined semi-auto as "one trigger pull, one round" and full-auto as "one trigger pull, multiple rounds". They had previously looked at bump stocks and decided they did not meet the full auto definition. Trump's EO apparently changed the definition to include them in the definition of full-auto.

BTW, those full-auto weapons are a blast to fire. Unfortunately, you can go through $100 worth of ammunition in about 30 seconds.

TexasFilly
Posts: 18462
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53662

Post by TexasFilly » Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am

Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett

User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7068
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:26 am

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53663

Post by pipistrelle » Tue Aug 06, 2019 12:12 pm

TexasFilly wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am
Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
Don’t forget this guy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... xplosives/

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16089
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53664

Post by ZekeB » Tue Aug 06, 2019 12:52 pm

TexasFilly wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am
Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
You use a hunting rifle for those. One shot is all you get anyway. They spook and scatter at the noise of a gun. Benjamin makes a .357 air rifle that will kill a deer. It makes less noise and the pigs don't scatter. It doesn't have a 30 round magazine either.
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45088
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53665

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:29 pm

TexasFilly wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am
Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
:like:

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9797
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53666

Post by GreatGrey » Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:27 am

So how batshit will Lena go over this?

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/ ... stream=top

E5C07C93-4DF1-4D99-BC84-C3393438DB68.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45088
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53667

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:32 am

Caused by the increase in Hispanic residents. What's happening in Orange County is also happening in Arizona and Texas. And to a somewhat lesser degree, in Florida.

(Taitz should welcome this. Remember, in the past, before Trump's demonization of Hispanics and Latinx, Taitz claimed to be Hispanic.)

Reeeko
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:01 am
Location: Lake of the Woods, VA

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53668

Post by Reeeko » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:23 pm

TexasFilly wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am
Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
That seems a shaky argument (and a slippery slope) to me. Why does anyone need a car that can go 0 to 60 in 3 seconds and top out at 200 MPH? Why does anyone need multiple 15,000 square foot houses with 13 bedrooms? A lot of stuff that I buy, I don't particularly need, but I just want. It's called freedom. I don't happen to have any guns, but I've gone with my family to a local range to "test" theirs just because it's kind of fun to shoot them at targets (and several had never shot a gun before, so it was, um, educational, too). And in the military, we had the opportunity to shoot M-16s and 50 mm on full auto, and it's kind of a blast (pun not intended). That said, I'm in full agreement with those who would increase controls over access to such weapons. They can be fun, but they can be extremely dangerous.

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16089
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53669

Post by ZekeB » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:29 pm

If you kill yourself with your 200 MPH car, I don’t care. If people start buying 200 MPH cars to kill others, I’m going to want them banned.
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

Reeeko
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:01 am
Location: Lake of the Woods, VA

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53670

Post by Reeeko » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:49 pm

ZekeB wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:29 pm
If you kill yourself with your 200 MPH car, I don’t care. If people start buying 200 MPH cars to kill others, I’m going to want them banned.
Maybe I should clarify that those were just examples (although I would certainly like a supercar, I imagine the wife has different priorities).

I'm still troubled by the concept of taking something away from the great majority of people who enjoy and use it responsibly, because of the actions of a few who don't. Especially if there are hundreds of millions of those things already in circulation. You can't put that toothpaste back in the tube, and any forward-looking policy would be a relative drop in the bucket.

What I WOULD like to see is a heavy tax on ammunition. But I'm not clueless enough to think that wouldn't just lead to an increase in reloading supplies.

ETA: Just occurred to me we're getting waaay off the topic of Orly's poopies here...

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16089
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53671

Post by ZekeB » Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:19 pm

Sometimes you have to make a sacrifice for the benefit of the general population. I'd like to have a Thompson. I'm a law-abiding citizen. If everyone like me had a Thompson when they wanted one, they would certainly work their way into the hands of the undesirables. They banned the Thompson for a good reason. They need to ban assault rifles for the same reason.
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

Reeeko
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:01 am
Location: Lake of the Woods, VA

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53672

Post by Reeeko » Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:33 pm

ZekeB wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:19 pm
Sometimes you have to make a sacrifice for the benefit of the general population. I'd like to have a Thompson. I'm a law-abiding citizen. If everyone like me had a Thompson when they wanted one, they would certainly work their way into the hands of the undesirables. They banned the Thompson for a good reason. They need to ban assault rifles for the same reason.
There's no functional difference between an "assault rifle" and any other semi-automatic rifle. They just look "badder".

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16089
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53673

Post by ZekeB » Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:40 pm

Reeeko wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:33 pm
ZekeB wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:19 pm
Sometimes you have to make a sacrifice for the benefit of the general population. I'd like to have a Thompson. I'm a law-abiding citizen. If everyone like me had a Thompson when they wanted one, they would certainly work their way into the hands of the undesirables. They banned the Thompson for a good reason. They need to ban assault rifles for the same reason.
There's no functional difference between an "assault rifle" and any other semi-automatic rifle. They just look "badder".
A semi-automatic hunting rifle is not as compact and is harder to hide. The ammunition is larger, so it is more difficult to carry and load more. The magazine isn't as large. Those with hunting rifles are less likely to think of them as their second penis. (First penis in the case of those who think they look "badder.")
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

User avatar
Dolly
Posts: 14320
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53674

Post by Dolly » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:47 pm

Dolly wrote:
Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:35 pm
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/the-post-sa ... apons-now/ :twisted:
The Post says: Ban assault weapons now. This is not left leaning NY Times or Wash Post. This is a conservative NY Post calling for an executive action to ban assault weapons such as AK 47 or AR 15
Posted on | August 4, 2019 | 2 Comments
► Show Spoiler
@realDonaldTrump
Time for an executive action to ban the assault weapons such as AK 47 and AR 15. Most American citizens and voters will support you on this
Comments on her post:

taino21
August 5th, 2019 @ 6:12 am
Really? Let’s ban rocks, the first recorded murder was with one, how about pens, or kitchen knives, pencils or better, let’s ban liberals, socialists, communist and anyone who votes democrap! All mass shootings recorded in U.S. history have been committed by them except one who was an independent with leftist views. Let’s forget what the murderer in Texas said, that he picked a gun free zone. How about if we ban every business that infringes on our God given right protected under the constitution to self protection!


dr_taitz@yahoo.com
August 5th, 2019 @ 7:39 am
I support the second amendment, but we need to stop these shootings when a 21 year old grabs AR 15 or AK 47 and murders 20 people within minutes. Tomorrow God forbid someone in your family can be among victims. Something has to be done to stop it. What do you propose?


Captain
August 5th, 2019 @ 8:56 am
We need better security. Let Walmart pay for security. When you see someone with gun walking across parking lot close and lock doors, shoot them as they come in. Bouncers don’t let people in with guns into clubs. – use metal detectors.

If America takes guns from us there will be even more crimes. Because the criminals will still have guns and the innovcent will not unless you are proposing a police state like communist Russia.

Otherwise we become Venezuela and China where citizens have no power and the government commits horrible atrocities. Can America trust our FBI and DOJ??? No way. They committed crimes to get Democrats out of trouble like Hillary and refuse to proseceute for their treasonous coup against Trump.

It seems like there are more of these mass killings in the hotter months. We need to not have a knee jerk reaction. Also NY Post is not conservative.


Jerry
August 5th, 2019 @ 9:53 am
I don’t see any reason for any person with a need to own high speed round weapons. Do you? Own guns? Yes! Own a weapon powerful enough to kill your whole neighborhood? No!


Freda Olson
August 5th, 2019 @ 4:26 pm
First off, Gun Free Zones should be banned, next, President Trump could, if he so wished to, demand that everyone of Legal age and Training, carry a Firearm. I would think that would stop someone, if they knew Self Defense was for Real, because the criminal would be faced with people who aren’t scared of stopping him. That would probably stop him from even thinking about doing such a thing to begin with, well hopefully anyway, that would also stop us from becoming a third world country, that the Dem’s strive for, which carries such sad beliefs. We can’t get a perfect world but a better world could be in order. God Bless America Amen


dr_taitz@yahoo.com
August 5th, 2019 @ 8:44 pm
in Ohio the guy was shooting people outside, on the street.
I am for the right to bear arms, but I am concerned about the fact that the guy in OH killed 9 and wounded 27 within 30 seconds


KBB
August 5th, 2019 @ 9:16 pm
NO I won’t support Pres. Trump on this. Everyone talks about every “solution” except the one that would work. No more gun laws. Get rid of all “gun free zone” signs. Allow every person who wants to legally carry do so. Every public place would have a few people who are legally carrying for defense. They could shoot down a crazy mass murderer at first sight. Only those who wanted to commit suicide would show up to shoot people.
:confused: So people should have guns / open carry. There should be not gun free zones. But if you are going into a store with your gun, you should be locked out and shot. "President Trump could, if he so wished to, demand that everyone of Legal age and Training, carry a Firearm." And that would include all the criminals.
Avatar by Tal Peleg Art of Makeup https://www.facebook.com/TalPelegMakeUp

User avatar
Dr. Blue
Posts: 913
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:01 am
Occupation: Call the doctor!

Re: Orly's latest poopies.....

#53675

Post by Dr. Blue » Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:01 am

Reeeko wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:23 pm
TexasFilly wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:54 am
Nobody who owns all of this high powered weaponry has ever been able to answer my question: "You need this for what?" Some responses have been "We need this to kill feral pigs" (they don't) or "They're fun to shoot." No doubt some would find bombs fun to set off too.
That seems a shaky argument (and a slippery slope) to me. Why does anyone need a car that can go 0 to 60 in 3 seconds and top out at 200 MPH? Why does anyone need multiple 15,000 square foot houses with 13 bedrooms? A lot of stuff that I buy, I don't particularly need, but I just want. It's called freedom. I don't happen to have any guns, but I've gone with my family to a local range to "test" theirs just because it's kind of fun to shoot them at targets (and several had never shot a gun before, so it was, um, educational, too). And in the military, we had the opportunity to shoot M-16s and 50 mm on full auto, and it's kind of a blast (pun not intended). That said, I'm in full agreement with those who would increase controls over access to such weapons. They can be fun, but they can be extremely dangerous.
OK, so the arguments for very powerful weapons that are designed to shoot very fast and in particular are designed to kill a lot of people very fast are (a) they're fun to shoot, and (b) constitution/militia. Why not have them at controlled shooting ranges where people can check them out on premises to have their fun, and in an armory where the well-regulated militia to get them for training or in case of emergency? What there doesn't seem to be any argument for is allowing them in the homes of people who might be mentally ill or stewing over some perceived slight, where they can grab them and go shoot up a bunch of people. Is there any argument at all for people having these - not "need" but just "want for some rational purpose" - in their homes?

Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”