Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34884
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1576

Post by realist » Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:52 pm

Docket Update...





08/01/2014 [link]46,[/link] NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 44 Memorandum and Order, 45 Order on Motion to Reopen Case by Orly Taitz.(Fee Status: Filing Fee Not Paid) (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 47 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 46 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to [/break1]ca4.uscourts.gov]http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices. (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)





08/01/2014 Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit — Initial (sls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/01/2014)As Stern sez... Absolute Perfection!!Just wondering how much this little grandstanding nothing that has no legs is gonna cost her. It says that the fee hasn't been paid. btw.Local Rule 3(a). Filing and Docket Fees.


Upon filing a notice of appeal, appellant shall pay the clerk of the district court a fee of $505,


which includes a $5 filing fee for the notice of appeal and a $500 fee for docketing the appeal in this


Court.[link]Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure


Local Rules of the Fourth Circuit,https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/docs/pdfs/rules.pdf[/link]
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 31131
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:01 am

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1577

Post by mimi » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:14 pm

It's perfect.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
:yeah: As I suspected. :-#

Nobody ever seems to notice. So, I'm just gonna paste it again.











It's perfect.
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
:yeah: As I suspected. :-#





:girlbutt: 8-) :taunt: :rockon:

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16900
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1578

Post by Suranis » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:19 pm

I read through it and as other have said its pure perfection. Obama is fucked guys. this is the beginning of the birther fightback.
Learn to Swear in Latin. Profanity with class!
https://blogs.transparent.com/latin/lat ... -in-latin/

rosy
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:36 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1579

Post by rosy » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:37 pm

You're right, Suranis. The frogs are getting ready to march. :(( :((

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1580

Post by SueDB » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:39 pm

Send out the Tadpoles! Now the frogmarching will begin any day now... :o
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Jim
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:05 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1581

Post by Jim » Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:41 pm

Got my bags packed and ready to move our operation overseas. http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/06/11/ ... =976325Now just need to choose where to reopen operations... :-k

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12692
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1582

Post by Notorial Dissent » Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:13 pm

Just wondering how much this little grandstanding nothing that has no legs is gonna cost her. It says that the fee hasn't been paid. btw.Lots and lots one can hope. (I know, vain hopes, kinda like for massive sanctions and rightful disbarment, but ya can still dream can't ya????) Maybe she's getting cheap, well cheaper and hoped they wouldn't notice.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
ObjectiveDoubter
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Location: Hollywood (more or less)

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1583

Post by ObjectiveDoubter » Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:25 pm

Just wondering how much this little grandstanding nothing that has no legs is gonna cost her. It says that the fee hasn't been paid. btw.Lots and lots one can hope. (I know, vain hopes, kinda like for massive sanctions and rightful disbarment, but ya can still dream can't ya????) Maybe she's getting cheap, well cheaper and hoped they wouldn't notice.Question, Part 2: Nothing can happen on this until she pays the buckos??? (I hope.)

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27045
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1584

Post by bob » Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:40 pm

Question, Part 2: Nothing can happen on this until she pays the buckos??? (I hope.)Eventually the clerk's office will notice that the fees haven't been paid, and will threaten to dismiss.





But I have no doubt that Taitz will open Yosi's her checkbook, and then beg for more money.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34884
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1585

Post by realist » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:22 am

:toxic: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/your-help-is-needed-for-505-4th-circuit-court-of-appeal-fee-in-taitz-v-colvin-case-of-obamas-use-of-a-stolen-ct-ssn-042-68-4425/]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/your-help-i ... 2-68-4425/ :toxic:





Your help is needed for $505 4th Circuit Court of Appeal fee in Taitz v Colvin, case of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425


Posted on | August 6, 2014 | No Comments


Taitz v Colvin appeal fee


:roll:





And the grift continues.
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 44878
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1586

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:58 am

Orly Taitz, Clounselor at Law, grifting for money for the frivolous appeal of a frivolous lawsuit.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27045
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1587

Post by bob » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:28 pm

Taitz v Colvin, Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425





Court of Appeals Docket #: [highlight]14-1773[/highlight] Docketed: 08/04/2014


Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974


Orly Taitz v. Carolyn Colvin


Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore


Fee Status: fee due


Case Type Information:


1) Civil U.S.


2) United States


3) null


Originating Court Information:


District: 0416-1 : 1:13-cv-01878-ELH


Presiding Judge: Ellen L. Hollander, U. S. District Court Judge


Date Filed: 06/25/2013


Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec’d COA:


07/25/2014 07/25/2014 08/01/2014 08/01/2014


06/13/2014 06/16/2014


05/13/2014 05/13/2014


08/04/2014 2 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH. Case manager: CBennett. [14-1773] (CB)


08/04/2014 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [14-1773] (CB)


08/04/2014 4 [highlight]INFORMAL[/highlight] BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Orly Taitz. Informal Opening Brief [highlight]due 08/28/2014[/highlight]. Informal response brief, if any: 17 days after informal opening brief filed. [14-1773] (CB)


08/04/2014 5 FEE NOTICE issued to Orly Taitz – initial notice. [highlight]Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/03/2014[/highlight]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH. Mailed to: Orly Taitz. [14-1773] (CB)


08/06/2014 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Local Rule 46(c)) for Carolyn W. Colvin.[999411100] [14-1773] [highlight]Allen Loucks[/highlight] :twisted: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-colvin-obamas-use-of-a-stolen-ct-ssn-042-68-4425/]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/taitz-v-col ... 2-68-4425/ :twisted:





1. 4th Cir. L.R. [/break1]ca4.uscourts.gov/docs/pdfs/rules.pdf]34(b):


Whenever . . . any [highlight]pro se[/highlight] appeal is filed from any other type of judgment or order, the clerk shall notify the appellant that appellant shall file, within 21 days after service of such notice, an informal brief, listing the specific issues and supporting facts and arguments raised on appeal. Appellee is permitted, [highlight]but not required[/highlight], to file an informal response brief within 14 days after service of appellant’s informal brief, and appellant is permitted, but not required, to file an informal reply brief within 10 days after service of appellee’s informal response brief. Appellant's informal brief and any informal response and reply briefs filed by the parties shall be considered,


together with the record and other relevant documents, by the panel to which the proceeding has been referred. The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.





The informal brief may be submitted on a form provided by the clerk and shall provide the specific information required by the form. The parties need not limit their briefs solely to the form. An additional supporting memorandum may be attached if a party deems it necessary in order to address adequately the issues raised, but the informal brief and any supporting memorandum shall not exceed the length limitations established by FRAP 32(a)(7). It is unnecessary to attach record


excerpts since the record is before the Court. [highlight]It is not necessary to cite cases in an informal brief[/highlight]. Unless additional copies are requested by the Clerk, only the original informal brief must be filed with the Court and copies served on the other parties to the case.





Once an informal briefing schedule has been established the parties may file a formal brief only with the permission of the Court. The Court initially reviews cases that are informally briefed under its procedures set forth in Local Rule 34(a) pertaining to pre-argument review.Taitz is being treated as if she's a layperson. :-bd





2. It would appear that, although [/break1]thefogbow.com/forum/search.php?keywords=Loucks]Loucks is not quite done with the pleasure of Taitz's company, he is not obligated to respond to whatever she files. (But I suspect the government will file its usual response.)





3. And, "for completeness," the 4th's letter directing to Taitz to pay the filing fee (or move for IFP status) by Sept. 3:


:twisted: [/break1]orlytaitzesq.com/wp-contentsrc="http://thefogbow.com/forum/uploads/2014 ... al-fee.pdf]http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/ ... al-fee.pdf :twisted:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

CatMe
Posts: 901
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:29 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1588

Post by CatMe » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:22 pm

Orly Taitz, Clounselor at Law, grifting for money for the frivolous appeal of a frivolous lawsuit.But I don't understand... :-k





Why should she have to beg her supporters for money? It says right there she can pay the fee or fill out the form to proceed as indigent. If she does not have the money to pay, shouldn't she just fill out the indigency form and save a few suckers supporters from having to eat cat food for a week to cover the fee for her? Is it possible she does not fill out the form because she actually does have the money?





8>

tjh
Posts: 2939
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1589

Post by tjh » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:50 pm

Is it possible she does not fill out the form because she actually does have the money 8>She was happy to lend herself a coupla hundred grand for electioneering grandstanding. But I guess she expected the lucrative salary of the position to repay that in no time. She wouldn't have been SoS (or whatever) Pro Bono, now would she?

User avatar
ZekeB
Posts: 16010
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Northwest part of Semi Blue State

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1590

Post by ZekeB » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:59 pm

Taitz swearing that she is indigent? That will get her tossed into the hoosegow faster than anything and she knows it.
Trump: Er hat eine größere Ente als ich.

Putin: Du bist kleiner als ich.

User avatar
gupwalla
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:57 pm
Location: The mind of Cassandra

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1591

Post by gupwalla » Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:45 am

NEWS FLASH: "Taitz Appeals for Money"California dentist and sometime attorney Orly Taitz is appealing a decision by a Maryland federal judge denying Taitz's request for the Social Security Administration to turn over records which it claims do not exist. Taitz is also asking supporters to donate money to cover court costs. But this has some people wondering - is Taitz's entire legal operation merely pretext for an internet money-making scheme? After all, Taitz should be able to pay her own legal costs - she holds two professional degrees, she runs a dental clinic, she is a member in good standing of the California state bar association, and her spouse is a successful technology executive. The relatively modest $505 filing fee ought not pose a burden to the Orange County attorney.
In a wilderness of mirrors, what will the spider do beyond the circuit of the shuddering Bear in fractured atoms? -TS Eliot (somewhat modified)

All warfare is based on deception. - Sun Tzu

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12692
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1592

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:53 am

The one thing Taitz will NEVER file in ANY court is a forma pauperis because she'd have to submit a financial form, under oath, and she is never ever going to do that. She'll beg money from her followers or else raid Yosi's wallet instead.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1593

Post by SueDB » Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:49 am

"Rich California Dentist/Lawyer Scams Mentally Ill for Pension Cash." :roll:
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8432
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1594

Post by Northland10 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:46 pm

Docket update from the Fourth Circuit:08/13/2014[tab=10] 7[tab=10]DISTRICT COURT UPDATE.USCA Appeal Fees received $505 receipt number 14637075875 re [46] Notice of Appeal filed by Orly Taitz [14-1773] (JB)08/14/2014[tab=10] 8[tab=10]APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Local Rule 46(c)) for Carolyn W. Colvin.[999415580] [14-1773] Molissa Farber08/19/2014[tab=10]9[tab=10]DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS (Local Rule 26.1) by Appellant Orly Taitz. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [999418579] [14-1773] (CB)08/19/2014[tab=10]10[tab=10]INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Appellant Orly Taitz. [14-1773] (CB)08/19/2014[tab=10]11[tab=10]Open Restricted Document [highlight]RESTRICTED ACCESS DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Orly Taitz. Document Title: Exhibits to informal brief. Full document restriction required due to: social security numbers, other personal identifiers.[/highlight] [999418633] [14-1773] (CB)
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

TexasFilly
Posts: 18321
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1595

Post by TexasFilly » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:57 pm

The one thing Taitz will NEVER file in ANY court is a forma pauperis because she'd have to submit a financial form, under oath, and she is never ever going to do that. She'll beg money from her followers or else raid Yosi's wallet instead.Pfft. Sharon Meroni filed an in forma pauperis affidavit once. Just an affidavit, no forms required. But she never did so again. ;;)
I love the poorly educated!!!

Kevin McCarthy: Paul Ryan playing with a head injury -- Jon Lovett

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9786
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1596

Post by GreatGrey » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:40 pm

The one thing Taitz will NEVER file in ANY court is a forma pauperis because she'd have to submit a financial form, under oath, and she is never ever going to do that. She'll beg money from her followers or else raid Yosi's wallet instead.Pfft. Sharon Meroni filed an in forma pauperis affidavit once. Just an affidavit, no forms required. But she never did so again. ;;)Meroni indicated she had an income in excess of $50,000.





Totally fucked up using the greater than / less than symbols.





And then a rutting deer stole her mail.
I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8138
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1597

Post by Estiveo » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:16 pm

I thought it was the meat truck that stole her mail. The rutting deer stole her dipstick or something.
Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
GreatGrey
Posts: 9786
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Location: Living in the Anthropocene

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1598

Post by GreatGrey » Tue Aug 19, 2014 10:45 pm

I thought it was the meat truck that stole her mail. The rutting deer stole her dipstick or something.That's what the deer want you to believe.
I am not "someone upthread".
Trump needs to be smashed into some kind of inedible orange pâté.

User avatar
SueDB
Posts: 27756
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Location: RIP, my friend. - Foggy

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1599

Post by SueDB » Wed Aug 20, 2014 12:23 am

The deer were holding the dipstick hostage.
“If You're Not In The Obit, Eat Breakfast”

Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!

User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 8138
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:31 pm
Location: Trouble's Howse

Taitz v Colvin (Maryland District Court)

#1600

Post by Estiveo » Wed Aug 20, 2014 12:35 am

The deer were holding the dipstick hostage.Silly wabbit, deers can't write ransom notes. Now...where do the numerous boxes of cheap wine figure in. Ooo...this is getting to be like an episode of Major Crimes. Or Dangerous Minds. Or Judge Judy or...something.
Image Image Image Image Image

Post Reply

Return to “Orly Taitz”