Larry Klayman

User avatar
Foggy
Posts: 29005
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater

Re: Larry Klayman

#3526

Post by Foggy » Fri Aug 16, 2019 12:56 pm

That's how I see it. Bias against idiots is my favorite. :blink:
I put the 'fun' in dysfunctional.

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12912
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3527

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:35 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 8:53 pm
All those words to say so little. And almost none of it true.

Strange how trump isn’t mentioned even though he palled around with Epstein too and Epstein was in the custody of the federal government at the time of his demise.
So, somewhat better????
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8541
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Larry Klayman

#3528

Post by Northland10 » Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:31 pm

In his attorney discipline case that has been sitting since being fully briefed in July 2018, it is scheduled to be heard by the DC Court of Appeals on Tuesday, 17 September, at 9:30 am. It was briefed over a year ago, ready for calendaring in April and added to the Calendar at the end of July.

DC is making the 9th look fast. There is a hearing a week earlier for another attorney with a case number near the same as GIL's.

On a side note, back in 2014, Larry filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Board of Professional Responsibility. It was denied in a week and his petition for rehearing en banc was also denied. There is no order on the DC Superior Court's site, so I don't know what it was about.
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8541
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Larry Klayman

#3529

Post by Northland10 » Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:14 pm

bob wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:12 pm
Northland10 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:37 pm
Dropping without comment since my stop I still coming. Latest denials in the 2006 Klayman v JW case.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... cv0670-604
D.D.C. wrote:This is the fourth time in ten years that Klayman has sought [Colleen Kollar-Kotelly]'s voluntary recusal and/or disqualification from this case. See Klayman’s Recons. & Recusal Mot. at 12-14; Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 628 F. Supp. 2d 98 (D.D.C. 2009) (“Klayman First Recusal Opinion”); Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 744 F. Supp. 2d 264 (D.D.C. 2010) (“Klayman Second Recusal Opinion”); Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 278 F. Supp. 3d 252 (D.D.C. 2017) (“Klayman Third Recusal Opinion”).
Klayman's attempt to disqualify this judge in other cases is part of the tale of his looming D.C. bar suspension.


The bigger news is that Judicial Watch (and Fitton) sought to attach Klayman's wages from Freedom Watch. :rotflmao: The court had stayed the attachment, but lifted that stay in this ruling. :popcorn:

The court also deferred ruling on Judicial Watch and Fitton's motion for attorney's fee until the appeals are complete, i.e., until Klayman's bill will be even larger.
Apparently, he followed up with another reconsideration request, to which the court has already dismissed. Also, in GIL's Florida case where he is suing Fitton for something Roger Stone said, Fitton stated during a deposition that Larry was not pushed out of JW because of a sexual harassment complaint (despite what Stone said). To Klayman, that is proof of fraud by JW in the 2006 case despite they never actually claimed he was removed from JW due to a sexual harassment complaint.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... cv0670-608
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 9379
Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Location: Animal Planet
Occupation: Permanent probationary slave to 1 dog, 1 cat, and 1 horse, 4 granddogs, and one grandcat.

Re: Larry Klayman

#3530

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer » Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:40 am

Kudos to all who maintain a Klayman Watch. The boy is BUSY!
A 19th Amendment Centennial Moment: On July 28, 1919, Arkansas became the 12th state to adopt the 19th Amendment.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45179
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Larry Klayman

#3531

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:43 am

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote:
Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:40 am
Kudos to all who maintain a Klayman Watch. The boy is BUSY!
Never mistake activity for achievement - John Wooden.

User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 2887
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:36 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Re: Larry Klayman

#3532

Post by MN-Skeptic » Fri Aug 23, 2019 2:37 pm

Press release - (cross posting in Laura Loomer's thread)

Rashida Tlaib Sued for Alleged Assault and Battery of Laura Loomer
Today, Freedom Watch and its general counsel Larry Klayman, a former federal prosecutor, announced the filing of a complaint for alleged assault and battery and other discriminatory religious based claims against Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota (Case No. 19-CV-2322) can be viewed at www.freedomwatchusa.org.

The complaint alleges Tlaib, a vehement anti-Semite and vowed opponent of Israel's right to exist, assaulted and battered conservative female Jewish journalist Laura Loomer during a campaign event in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Tlaib's fellow anti-Semitic ally Ilhan Omar, when the two were running for US Congress in 2018.

Ms. Loomer, who is now running for US Congress in Florida's 21st Congressional District, did not bring this complaint for political purposes, but to hold Tlaib accountable for her unhinged hatred of Jews and Israel, manifest in Tlaib's physical attack on Loomer caught on camera. During the campaign event which Tlaib attended in support of Omar's candidacy in 2018, Loomer asked simple and straightforward questions of the future Congresswoman about her stances toward Israel, Jews and terrorist groups such as Hamas. In response, and in the presence of Omar, who looked on approvingly, Tlaib violently lunged at Loomer, interacted with her physically and grabbed her phone, which Loomer was using to film the event which took place at a Palestinian restaurant. This put Loomer in alleged fear of immediate severe bodily injury. Later, Loomer filed a criminal complaint against Tlaib with the Minneapolis Police Department, which to this day has languished in its files — likely because the police do not want to be smeared as "Islamophobic" by Tlaib and Omar, especially given that Minnesota's powerful Attorney General, Keith Ellison, who is a Muslim political ally of Tlaib and Omar, is also an anti-Semite and close to Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.

As a result, due to the inaction of the Minneapolis Police Department, Loomer felt duty bound to bring her complaint against Tlaib, so that this hate-filled anti-Semitic Congresswoman can be held to account to the rule of American law, rather than the Sharia law she and her sister radical Muslim Congresswoman Omar pledge their primary allegiance to.

"The nation needs to thank my client Laura Loomer for having the courage to take legal action against someone who has bragged that the Holocaust gives her a 'calming feeling.' Few in this country will stand up to the forces of evil and Ms. Loomer is a stellar and shining example of what former President John F. Kennedy, Jr., wrote about in his famous book 'Profiles in Courage,'" said Klayman.
(Copied the whole article since it's only 5 paragraphs.)

Link to complaint
MAGA - Morons Are Governing America

User avatar
tek
Posts: 3813
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Happy Valley, MA
Occupation: Damned if I know

Re: Larry Klayman

#3533

Post by tek » Fri Aug 23, 2019 3:37 pm

oh lord...
There's no way back
from there to here

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27265
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3534

Post by bob » Sat Aug 24, 2019 4:14 am

WND: My giant-slaying week fighting for real justice:
Exclusive: Larry Klayman cites 3 developments* in his battle for American patriots

* * *

Never has this mantle been made clearer than this week, where I have been engaged, as is normal for my line of legal work, with more than a few hard-hitting cases designed to mete out justice. In this regard, Freedom Watch and our brave client Laura Loomer, who is now running for Congress is my home state of Florida, Palm Beach County to be exact, scored a major victory in the class action antitrust lawsuit I filed against the leftist-run social media companies Google/YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Apple. The complaint, which was dismissed without cause by a timid and intellectually dishonest lower court judge, alleges that these companies attempted to monopolize the social media markets by acting in parallel fashion, that is in tandem, to discriminate and ban conservatives and others of similar ilk in and from their platforms.

* * *

So when the lower court judge dismissed our case, falsely claiming that our charges were "not plausible" (what planet does he live on?), I quickly took an appeal for Ms. Loomer and Freedom Watch. And, as predicted, with their well-financed mega-Democrat law firms in tow, these social media companies then quickly moved to have our appeal dismissed.

Well, fellow patriots, this week, lo and behold, the usually left-leaning U.S. Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit ("D.C. Circuit") put its foot down and with a panel comprised of a new Trump appointee and also a George W. Bush appointee, brushed aside the social media companies' appellate motion to dismiss. As a result, the appeal with now be heard and decided by them, with an oral argument before this three-judge panel in the not too distant future.
This is what counts as a victory for Klayman these days: Not having his appeal summarily dismissed. :roll:


* Loomer's new suit and filing Bundy's brief being the other two "victories." :yankyank:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8541
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Larry Klayman

#3535

Post by Northland10 » Sat Aug 31, 2019 2:19 pm

So, in his never-ending quest to reverse the judgment in his 2006 case against Judicial Watch, he filed a "PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL WITHOUT BOND" in the case. In it, he claims he has a good chance of having the judgment reversed on appeal and 7 pages of other stuff. He claims he will file the appeal on 5 September.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 09.0_2.pdf

I guess he is so confident about the appeal that on the same day as the motion to stay, he filed a new complaint. This one is a "Complaint to set aside judgement for damages and for other relief." He argues that this case is for Rule 60(b) and Rule 60(d) relief. The reason, of course, he is opening a new case is he wants a different judge and that his current nemesis should not be assigned.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 49.1.0.pdf

The jury verdict and the initial judgement on the verdict were in March 2018. The court entered her final judgement, after all of Larry's motions for stuff, on March 18, 2019. Has he already blown the time for filing an appeal? He has not even filed a notice of appeal.

The full docket from CourtListener.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/42 ... er_by=desc
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27265
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3536

Post by bob » Sat Aug 31, 2019 3:48 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2019 2:19 pm
So, in his never-ending quest to reverse the judgment in his 2006 case against Judicial Watch, he filed a "PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL WITHOUT BOND" in the case. In it, he claims he has a good chance of having the judgment reversed on appeal and 7 pages of other stuff.
Klayman wrote:The Court allowed the jury to hear highly prejudicial testimony that lacked relevance to Defendants/Counterclaimants’ counterclaims or Plaintiff’s claims in chief; namely testimony that Plaintiff had in effect sexually harassed a Judicial Watch office manager and physically assaulted his ex-wife.
:popcorn:

Klayman also alleges that Judicial Watch is now worth around $100M, and this $2.8M verdict is just pocket change for it. Whereas Klayman doesn't have $2.8M for an appeals bond. :violin:

"Complaint to set aside judgement for damages and for other relief."
Klayman prays for, not just that Judicial Watch's $2.8M verdict against him be set aside, but that Klayman be awarded $2.8M.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45179
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Larry Klayman

#3537

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:16 pm

And . . .

Image

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12912
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3538

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Aug 31, 2019 9:10 pm

Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:16 pm
And . . .

Image
Oh definitely, and a unicorn fating rainbows as well would be nice.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Whip
Posts: 4000
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3539

Post by Whip » Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:16 pm

bob wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2019 3:48 pm

Klayman also alleges that Judicial Watch is now worth around $100M,
not sure I'd be throwing around a huge value increase since I was thrown out.

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 45179
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Over the drawbridge

Re: Larry Klayman

#3540

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Sat Aug 31, 2019 11:30 pm

Image

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27265
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3541

Post by bob » Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:01 pm

WND: I'm 'pathologically litigious'? Sure, and proudly so!:
Exclusive: Larry Klayman quotes Thomas Paine to counter 'pure evil termites' of Deep State

* * *

This leftist onslaught began long ago, even before I conceived of and founded Judicial Watch 25 years ago, but it has grown more pronounced with each passing year since then. Frustrated and disgusted by the lack of courage and desire by my former alma mater, the U.S. Department of Justice, to combat this by enforcing the law equally and not allowing the elite political and legal classes – infesting both the Democratic and Republican establishments – to be exempt from the rule of law, much more the Constitution – and Bill and Hillary Clinton, James Comey and Special Counsel Robert Mueller are just a few examples of these "protected species" – my only recourse on behalf of the American people has been to bring hundreds of hard-hitting lawsuits and commission citizens grand juries to indict and then try and convict these dastardly felons who are eating away at the ethical and moral fabric of the nation, like the pure evil "termites" they are.

Indeed, in this context, I am proud to proclaim that I accept the pejorative characterization given to me by the SLPC as a "pathologically litigious" attorney. What other choice do I have, as someone who ideologically and in practice believes in an honest and just governmental and legal systems, short of taking to the streets armed like our forefathers in colonial times?

In this regard, I get up every morning thinking of what Freedom Watch and I can do to right the course of the nation's downward slide toward leftist socialism, fascism, anti-Semitism, anti-Christianity and atheism and defeat the onslaught of barbarians who are now at the gates, armed and ready like newly minted and rabid radicals Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib – all figuratively foaming at the mouth and poised to take total control of the levers of power in the deepening swamp known as our nation's capital.

So it has come to pass that I pledge to you, fellow patriots, that if the SLPC and its vile leftist allies think that I am "pathologically litigious," in the words of our great former President Ronald Reagan, "they ain't seen anything yet!"
P.S.: Send money.
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12912
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3542

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:35 pm

Ironically, probably the one thing he's said that was true in memory.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34951
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3543

Post by realist » Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:45 pm

“SLPC” ? :rotflmao:

Moron
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

Jcolvin2
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 12:40 am

Re: Larry Klayman

#3544

Post by Jcolvin2 » Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:23 am

realist wrote:
Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:45 pm
“SLPC” ?
Socialist Leftist & Politically Correct

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 12912
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3545

Post by Notorial Dissent » Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:36 am

They don't like KKKlayman and call him as they see him, therefore de be ebil!!!!!! :rotflmao:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8541
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Larry Klayman

#3546

Post by Northland10 » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:12 am

As a reminder, a week from Tuesday (Tuesday 17 September), at 9:30 am, In Re Larry Klayman. This is for his first discipline issue where the board recommended a 90 day suspension but no fitness requirement.

For those who want to be BOTI (Boots on the Internet), it looks like the have live streaming from at least some courtrooms along with an archive.

https://www.dccourts.gov/court-of-appea ... -arguments
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 8541
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Larry Klayman

#3547

Post by Northland10 » Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:16 am

More winning in his 2006 case against JW. The evil biased judge who hates Larry because he's male/conservative/Christian/Jewish/anti-Clinton/crusader/named Larry/etc, has denied Motion to stay enforcement of judgement pending appeal without bond.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... cv0670-615
North-land: of the family 10

UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
realist
Posts: 34951
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3548

Post by realist » Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:25 am

Northland10 wrote:
Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:16 am
More winning in his 2006 case against JW. The evil biased judge who hates Larry because he's male/conservative/Christian/Jewish/anti-Clinton/crusader/named Larry/etc, has denied Motion to stay enforcement of judgement pending appeal without bond.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... cv0670-615

:thumbs:
ImageX 4 ImageX36
Image

User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 16996
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Larry Klayman

#3549

Post by Suranis » Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:11 am

a MIGHTY copypaste motion to reconsider will be fired from the Cannon of FREEDOM forthwith, no doubt.
Learn to Swear in Latin. Profanity with class!
https://blogs.transparent.com/latin/lat ... -in-latin/

User avatar
bob
Posts: 27265
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Larry Klayman

#3550

Post by bob » Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:22 am

Renew America:
Klayman wrote:I am almost embarrassed with myself with being right 100 percent of the time.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”