Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

GIL: Klayman

User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#176

Post by bob »

Shout-out from Popehat about Klayman's Farah failsuit:


The backstory:
On Jan. 25, Nicholas Wallace, a third-year student at Stanford Law School, sent a satirical flyer to a student listserv reserved for debate and political commentary. The flyer promoted a fake event, “The Originalist Case for Inciting Insurrection,” ostensibly sponsored by the Stanford Federalist Society. It advertised the participation of two politicians who tried to overturn the 2020 election, Missouri Sen. Joshua Hawley and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. “Violent insurrection, also known as doing a coup, is a classical system of installing a government,” the flyer read, adding that insurrection “can be an effective approach to upholding the principle of limited government.”
The SFS whined to the administration, which initiated an investigation, which could have jeopardized Wallace's ability to take the bar. After some very public ridicule (and threats of lawsuits), the administration backed off.

In conclusion: Klayman is helping the children learn. :towel:
Image ImageImage
chancery
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:24 pm
Verified:

Re: GIL: Klayman

#177

Post by chancery »

Wallace's graduation was in limbo for months. Stanford didn't back down until the recent wave of online dunking.

As the savy folks at LGM are fond of saying, college PC/Cancel Culture is OUT OF CONTROL!
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#178

Post by northland10 »

Apparently, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a little put out that he did not properly notify them of the 90-day suspension by the DC Circuit (or the original DC suspension).

I don't think he has practice here much which is probably why he did not respond. I assume point 4 will not be followed as he has not done it at all, anywhere.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN RE LARRY KLAYMAN,
Respondent
2021-MA003
8 June 2021

ORDER

Larry Klayman was suspended 90 days, effective March 26, 2021, by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia based on the District of Columbia Court of Appeal's earlier suspension of him for 90 days. The court issued a show-cause order directing Mr. Klayman to respond as to why he should not face a reciprocal 90-day suspension in this court and also why he should not face disciplinary action for failing to notify this court of his disbarment under Federal Circuit Attorney Disciplinary Rule 6(a). He has not responded.*

Upon consideration thereof.

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Mr. Klayman is suspended from practicing law in this court from 90 days from the date of filing of this order. Any additional disciplinary action concerning Mr. Klayman's failure to timely notify the court of his suspension by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia shall be dealt with upon any request for reinstatement by Mr. Klayman.

(2) When the terms of his suspension are over, Mr. Klayman may apply for reinstatement pursuant to Federal Circuit Attorney Discipline Rule 9(a).

(3) While this order is in effect, Mr. Klayman is prohibited from holding himself out to be an attorney at law licensed to practice before this court.

(4) Mr. Klayman is directed to send a copy of this order to all other courts before which he is admitted. Fed. Cir. Att'y Discipline Rule 5(f).

(5) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank. Fed. Cir. Att'y Discipline Rule 5(f).

For the Court
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

*Federal Circuit Attorney Discipline Rule 7(c) provides that "{i}f an attorney does not object to the imposition of reciprocal discipline or does not respond to the show cause order, the Clerk may then issue a final order imposing such reciprocal discipline."
101010 :towel:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#179

Post by bob »

northland10 wrote: Wed Jun 09, 2021 8:32 pm Apparently, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a little put out that he did not properly notify them of the 90-day suspension by the DC Circuit (or the original DC suspension).
Klayman had a small practice in the federal circuit court of appeals in the 80s and 90s (essentially pre-Judicial Watch). Most of the cases are routine; what one would expect to see in the federal circuit.

Except for one, which was the genesis of Klayman Gotta Klayman. The appeal is all about Klayman's behavior and how he was baned from a judge's courtroom.

But it is unsurprising that Klayman didn't bother to respond to fight this.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14353
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: GIL: Klayman

#180

Post by RTH10260 »

northland10 wrote: Wed Jun 09, 2021 8:32 pm Apparently, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a little put out that he did not properly notify them of the 90-day suspension by the DC Circuit (or the original DC suspension).

I don't think he has practice here much which is probably why he did not respond. I assume point 4 will not be followed as he has not done it at all, anywhere.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN RE LARRY KLAYMAN,
Respondent
2021-MA003
8 June 2021

ORDER
:snippity:

(2) When the terms of his suspension are over, Mr. Klayman may apply for reinstatement pursuant to Federal Circuit Attorney Discipline Rule 9(a).

:snippity:
I guess point (2) will be a stumbling block for further work at the court.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#181

Post by bob »

I doubt Klayman is going to ever work on a case under the Federal Circuit's specialized jurisdiction again.

He has hasn't graced that court with his brilliance since the 90s.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#182

Post by bob »

Live tweet from the Borat v. Roy Moore hearing:

Some serious baby splitting; it would appear that:
1. Judge nixes Klayman's whine that Cohen was fed answers during his deposition, but
2. There's no need for a protective order for the deposition (so Klayman can and will publish it), and
3. Judge won't recuse, but
4. Judge won't refer Klayman for discipline for not disclosing his suspension.

In other words, the judge continues to treat Klayman like he's sane and normal.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#183

Post by bob »


This is the case about the Bidens' "forcing" Google to temporarily suspend his YouTubes.

So then-President-elect Biden moved to dismiss in January.

The court in May set the hearing date (for today, at 2:30 pm ET).

Klayman filed his opposition ... on Friday. :doh:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#184

Post by northland10 »

Is this one of his state court games? I don't recall seeing this on Pacer.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#185

Post by bob »

northland10 wrote: Mon Jun 14, 2021 7:04 pm Is this one of his state court games?
Yeah; one of his 10 in Palm Beach County.

Docket hasn't yet been updated after today's hearing.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#186

Post by bob »


Even I have stopped caring; I can't be bothered to learn the details. :yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 17654
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: GIL: Klayman

#187

Post by raison de arizona »

bob wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 11:25 am https://twitter.com/FreedomWatchUSA/sta ... 8436489222
Even I have stopped caring; I can't be bothered to learn the details. :yawn:
Started listening, he has quite a list of indictments going.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#188

Post by Luke »

Funny how Lamberth is courageous only when he agrees with GIL. Guess he didn't want to go tilting at windmills with Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman.

Larry Klayman Retweeted Freedom Watch Flag of United States @FreedomWatchUSA 2m
Once-Courageous Judge Lamberth Caves to the Left! Order "It Takes a Revolution!" @ http://FREEDOMWATCHUSA.ORG

Freedom Watch TV June 24, 2021
freedomwatchusa.org

Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#189

Post by northland10 »

GIL and his :yankyank: Grand Jury should indict Lamberth.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#190

Post by northland10 »

Remember how, in his attempt to stop his interim suspension by the DCCA (DC Court of Appeals), he sued all of the judges of the DCCA. One my think that you can't do that because of judicial immunity. One person who thinks that is Judge Amy Berman Jackson who, in showing her true leftist, man-hating, Christian-hating, Jew-Hating, globalist credentials, dismissed the case.

In short, he brought this section 1983 action and then tried to thread the needle to avoid the obvious judges don't apply part by citing a case from the 80s that was later rendered moot by legislation.

Bob will be along shortly to actually explain it better than what I just did and add in the other details.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... 1cv0409-29
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 7541
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

Re: GIL: Klayman

#191

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

For a IANAL, you did well. Beware the practicing law without a license, though. 8-)
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#192

Post by northland10 »

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 8:48 pm For a IANAL, you did well. Beware the practicing law without a license, though. 8-)
I could add a sig... "I am not a lawyer and have no clue what I am talking about, including the law." :biggrin:
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#193

Post by Luke »

Rut roh, ABJ may have just handed Rev Dr Laity Esq his win :lol:
The matter reached the Supreme Court, which analyzed the common law to determine whether the judge was immune. Id. at 541–42; see id. at 529–538 (analyzing common law history from the King’s use of prerogative writs through modern day jurisprudence)
Gotta say, after looking at Alan Ritchson for about a half hour (see Our Big Gay Topic), Grossly Inappropriate Larry and his time-wasting bs was a comedown. But, a smackdown is a smackdown so happy! :P
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#194

Post by bob »

Of course, Klayman's nemeses, Twombly and Iqbal, make guest appearances.

The bigger picture is that Klayman hangs his hat on the argument that he wants future injunctive relief (against ... the D.C. Ct. App.'s not ruling against Klayman in the future? :think: ). The D.D.C. correctly says, "Nope; you want me to undo the past, and that's not happening. P.S. go cry your river on appeal, to SCOTUS. FOAD; HAND."
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#195

Post by northland10 »

Since GIL-Fails tend to come in groups, I thought I should check PACER. Yep, there is something there. His Corsi-Klayman case against Infowars, Alex Jones, David Jones, and Roger Stone in the Western District of Texas was dismissed, with prejudice.

Sadly, the defendant's motion for sanctions was dismissed without prejudice for refile. In addition, in the final order:
IT IS ORDERED that Infowars, LLC, Free Speech Systems, LLC, Alex E. Jones, David Jones, Owen Shroyer, and Roger Stone are awarded costs of court.
I was hoping they would lose something as well.. OH well.

So, to review, the magistrate's report and recommendation (to which the judge accepted):
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .108.0.pdf

Twombly and Iqbal, as is tradition, make an appearance in the legal standard. As the magistrate judge included "conclusory" three times in the report, well, it looks like Twombly vexed Klayman again.

Farah v Esquire makes an appearance.

So the judge accepted the report with some words, given the various whining from Klayman after the report.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .122.0.pdf

It included:
Corsi and Klayman next argue that the magistrate judge erroneously recommended dismissing the defamation claims against Shroyer and David Jones based on a lack of personal involvement because allegations in the complaint that defendants were working "in concert" to
defame Corsi and Klayman were ignored. The court disagrees. In reviewing the pleadings, the magistrate judge determined that Corsi and Klayman' s claims of alleged concerted action or conspiracy were insufficient to survive dismissal because the assertions were wholly conclusory
and unsupported by any facts. In their objections, Corsi and Klayman provide no basis to sustain this objection and merely reassert the same insufficient, conclusory claims while referencing affidavits outside of the scope of a Rule 12(b)(6) inquiry.
IANAL but it sounds like.. Vexed again.

Here is the docket. Klayman was quick to request reconsideration through the filing has deficiencies. He also probably a timing thing, replied to the defendant's response to Klayman's objection to the report. The defendants were also quick to respond to his motion for reconisderation.

The case is marked as closed.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16 ... owars-llc/
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#196

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:07 pm Of course, Klayman's nemeses, Twombly and Iqbal, make guest appearances.

The bigger picture is that Klayman hangs his hat on the argument that he wants future injunctive relief (against ... the D.C. Ct. App.'s not ruling against Klayman in the future? :think: ). The D.D.C. correctly says, "Nope; you want me to undo the past, and that's not happening. P.S. go cry your river on appeal, to SCOTUS. FOAD; HAND."
He skipped over the request for consideration and motion to disqualify and went straight for the Notice of Appeal on the same day as the judgment. When he is looking to actually get off of suspension, he avoids the harassment tactics. He can save those for when Klayman v. Porter, Kaiser, Porter, Kaiser, et al are tossed.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#197

Post by northland10 »

Not Klayman's best week....

When I saw Klayman v Judicial Watch on the recent judgement from the DC Circuit, I got all excited. Sadly, it was his appeal for his case where he tried to end around the DC Circuit and have another judge overrule Kollar-Kotelly on his original 2006 Klayman v Judicial Watch. When his case was in danger of being transferred to Kollar-Kotelly as related, he quickly added the judge as a defendant.

That leftist panel of an Obama appointee (and he's black) and two Trump appointees (including Rao) said, um. no (per curiam). They cited one of his previous cases against and Kollar-Kottelly. Too, also.. guess who appears. GIL was Twomblied again.

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/ ... 904268.pdf
101010 :towel:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#198

Post by bob »

Klayman's bringing out the big gun!:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Frater I*I
Posts: 3210
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
Contact:

Re: GIL: Klayman

#199

Post by Frater I*I »

bob wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2021 5:01 pm Klayman's bringing out the big gun!:
I see a certain individul laft a few replies to Sheriff Bulls%^ter...
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"

Trent Reznor
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#200

Post by bob »

IT'S HERE! IT'S HERE!


The few shots that show the crowd indicate a ... light attendance.

It appears to be a weird airing of grievances. Various people with various oxen to gore. But nothing particularly constitutional or convention-y.
Image ImageImage
Post Reply

Return to “Law and Lawsuits”