Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

GIL: Klayman

User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#51

Post by bob »

sterngard friegen wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:42 pm Is offending the grossly inappropriate Larry Klayman a capital offense?
Listening to Klayman drone on is self-imposed cruel and unusual punishment.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#52

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:46 pm
sterngard friegen wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:42 pm Is offending the grossly inappropriate Larry Klayman a capital offense?
Listening to Klayman drone on is self-imposed cruel and unusual punishment.
Uh oh. Now GIL is going to sue Tom Fitton and Julia Porter because Bob defamed him.
101010 :towel:
woodworker
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am
Location: San Mateo, Calif
Occupation: Slave to my cats

Re: GIL: Klayman

#53

Post by woodworker »

sterngard friegen wrote: Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:42 pm Is offending the grossly inappropriate Larry Klayman a capital offense?
It is a moral imperative.
User avatar
sad-cafe
Posts: 1990
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 am
Location: Kansas aka Red State Hell

Re: GIL: Klayman

#54

Post by sad-cafe »

what an idiot
jcolvin2
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:56 am
Verified:

Re: GIL: Klayman

#55

Post by jcolvin2 »

DC Circuit imposes reciprocal 90 day suspension, and refers matter to Committee for recommendations as to whether further discipline warranted.
Klayman - DC Circuit Suspension 2021-03-26.pdf
(123.65 KiB) Downloaded 103 times
When asked at oral argument why he had failed to notify the court pursuant to Rule X, Mr. Klayman offered no coherent explanation. See Oral Arg. Tr. 10–12. In a self-styled “Supplement to Respondent’s Initial Brief,” filed just after oral argument, Mr. Klayman told us that “[t]he reason that he did not immediately inform” this court of his suspension “was because” his petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc of his suspension “were pending [in the D.C. Court of Appeals] at the time and Mr. Klayman believed that he would be successful in obtaining a favorable ruling.” Supplement to Respondent’s Initial Br. 2. This is an astonishing argument. Rule X is crystal clear: “an attorney admitted to practice before this Court” who is “subjected to public discipline for professional misconduct . . . shall so notify the Clerk of this Court in writing within ten days of such discipline.” See Disciplinary Rule X (emphasis added). “Shall” means shall, and, unsurprisingly, the rule contains no exceptions for lawyers who think they might successfully challenge their discipline on appeal.

With respect to the second basis for considering imposing discipline retroactively—voluntary withdrawal from practice before this court—Mr. Klayman failed to withdraw from representing three clients until after we issued our order to show cause. See Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Luhn v. Scott, No. 19-7146 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 10, 2020); Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Lovelien v. United States, No. 19-5325 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 12, 2020); Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Corsi v. Mueller, No. 19-5314 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 12, 2020). Indeed, Mr. Klayman failed to mention one of those cases in his brief, see Br. 15, and even filed a brief on behalf of one client two days after his D.C. suspension took effect, see Appellants’ Final Reply Br., Lovelien v. United States, No. 19-5325 (D.C. Cir. July 13, 2020).

For the foregoing reasons, Larry Klayman is suspended from practice before this court for ninety days, effective as of the date of this opinion and the accompanying order. Mr. Klayman is prohibited from holding himself out to be an attorney at law licensed to practice before the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the suspension. In addition, pursuant to Disciplinary Rule II(d), this matter is referred to the Committee on Admissions and Grievances for recommendations about any further discipline warranted by Mr. Klayman’s failure to comply with Rule X.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#56

Post by bob »

jcolvin2 wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 3:34 pm DC Circuit imposes reciprocal 90 day suspension, and refers matter to Committee for recommendations as to whether further discipline warranted.
Executive summary: Dude, you shoulda just taken the L and moved on.

For :oldman: : Rotunda, although dead, gets a smackdown:
D.D.C. wrote:Mr. Klayman quotes at length from a portion of the Rotunda letter that relies heavily on the Supreme Court’s
decision in Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012). [ . . . ] There, the Court concluded that counsel’s failure to properly withdraw from representation of a death row inmate excused the inmate’s failure to meet a crucial filing deadline because counsel’s effective abandonment was an “extraordinary circumstance.” [ . . . ] From this, Rotunda concludes that “it [was] reasonable and understandable that Mr. Klayman believed that he had an ethical obligation . . . to zealously and diligently represent” [ . . . ] Maples, however, has nothing whatsoever to do with this case, as the lawyers involved there were not representing a client whose interests were adverse to a former client. Maples is about client abandonment, not switching sides.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#57

Post by northland10 »

DC Circuit wrote:In a self-styled “Supplement to Respondent’s Initial Brief,” filed just after oral argument, Mr. Klayman told us that “[t]he reason that he did not immediately inform” this court of his suspension “was because” his petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc of his suspension “were pending [in the D.C. Court of Appeals] at the time and Mr. Klayman believed that he would be successful in obtaining a favorable ruling.
That was his statement, multiple times, to the Nevada court in the Bundy case (IIRC, he was telling them he had reached a settlement, which, actually did not happen). It didn't work then, I don't know why he might think it would work now, especially as the court pointed out, it doesn't matter.

This ought to be worth another lawsuit against Porter, Fox, and all the gang at the DC ODC.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#58

Post by Luke »

But gosh the hearing went so well! :lol:

And thanks, Bob, for following the thrilling and universe-shattering Grand Slam Grand Jury proceedings! GIL should have used that vital matter in his defense to really show the judges just how important he is. 8-)
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
jcolvin2
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:56 am
Verified:

Re: GIL: Klayman

#59

Post by jcolvin2 »

Supreme Court declines to review DC Circuit determination that Hillary Clinton need not sit for a deposition in Judicial Watch suit.MSN Article
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#60

Post by bob »

jcolvin2 wrote: Mon Mar 29, 2021 3:33 pm Supreme Court declines to review DC Circuit determination that Hillary Clinton need not sit for a deposition in Judicial Watch suit.MSN Article
Speaking of Judicial Watch: Renew America: The left and Tom Fitton!:
Klayman wrote:Comrades When It Comes to Larry Klayman!

Ever since I founded Judicial Watch, Inc., on July 29, 1994 – that is almost 27 years ago – and began by holding the Bonnie and Clyde of American politics, Bill and Hillary Clinton to task – the left has been on a jihad to either severely damage me as an activist conservative lawyer through defamatory articles and other dirty tricks, or through phony bar complaints to try to eliminate me from the practice of law. Incredibly, Tom Fitton has collaborated with the left in this latter jihad in particular.

Filing two of these phony bar complaints has been Tom Fitton, an individual who I had hired as my assistant at Judicial Watch but who with poor judgment at the time I later promoted to president, with my retaining my titles as chairman and general counsel. Notwithstanding that Fitton is not a lawyer – indeed when he interviewed with me he falsely represented that he was a college graduate, which he was not at the time – ever since I left my baby to run for the U.S. Senate in Florida in 2003, feeling insecure he then tried to harm me and my family. These two bar complaints are just a small chapter in this long saga which is still winding its way through the courts and has been ongoing for two decades.

One of Fitton’s bar complaints was over my having stepped in to represent three persons who had been harmed when I left Judicial Watch to run for the U.S. Senate in Florida. The first, Louise Benson, an elderly woman now almost ninety years old, who is like my mother, had donated $15,000.00 and pledged another $35,000.00 to a donor fund to buy the building which housed Judicial Watch. Like the other donors who donated their hard earned monies for naming rights for offices and other honoraria – a common practice for non-profits – Louise expected to have one of our offices named in her honor. She wanted to buy the rights for my office, but as someone else, Adolph Schoepe, then the owner of Fluidmaster, had purchased it first, she purchased the rights for Fitton’s office. Despite this, after I left Fitton and Judicial Watch, despite our having raised over $1,400,000 from donors to buy the building and promising in exchange naming rights and other honoraria to donors such as Louise, Judicial Watch pocketed the monies and to this day, going on twenty years later, no building has been purchased. (A review of Judicial Watch’s 990 tax return for 2019 at www.judicialwatch.org reveals that it has assets of over $172 million dollars as of that date, and likely over $200 million by 2021). Sadly, since the average age of a Judicial Watch donor was and remains over 70 years old, many of the donors are no longer alive to see the benefit of their now misappropriated contributions.

The second person is Peter Paul, who came to Judicial Watch and me because he was in fear of the Clinton Justice Department indicting him for alleged securities and bank fraud. I write about Peter in my second book, “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment!,” describing how Peter put on a Hollywood Tribute for then President Bill Clinton to raise money for Hillary’s then campaign for the U.S. Senate in New York. But the money which was raised, nearly $2 million dollars, so called hard money contributions, was hugely over the limit under federal law and thus criminal in nature, and the Clintons never reported it honestly in any event. Peter, having the hard proof that the Clintons has committed crimes and agreeing to come forward if we would defend him in this own criminal proceedings, Judicial Watch and I thus entered into a legal representation agreement to defend him if he would cooperate in our legal actions against the Clintons to finally, we hoped, have them held to account under the rule of law. However, when I left Judicial Watch to run for the U.S. Senate, Fitton, the non-lawyer and his “yes men,” Paul Orfanedes and Chris Farrell on the Board of Directors, who he had somehow coopted, abandoned Peter and he wound up doing ten years in prison largely as a result.

The third person is Sandra Cobas, who is like my sister and who managed the Judicial Watch Southern Regional Office in Miami, my then home city in Florida. Wanting to force out all of the regional office managers who I had hired when I left Judicial Watch to run for the U.S. Senate, Fitton put up a person who aspired to take over from Sandy, Elaine Rodriguez, to defame and harass Cobas, by calling her in front of other office personnel a drug addict and fat old Cuban bitch, among other ethnic and gender slurs. When I tried to resolve matters for Sandy as I was leaving, Fitton, Orfanedes and Farrell gave her the “back of their hands” and she was forced out. Sandy later became my chief of staff when I ran for the U.S. Senate in 2003-2004.

Needless to say, litigation resulted for all three persons, Louise, Peter and Sandy, through another legal counsel. But when they could no longer afford to pay this law firm, I felt duty bound to step in to try to help the pro bono, that is without charging them for my time and expense. For this, claiming that I had a conflict of interest in doing so, Fitton filed a bar complaint against me, which is now over thirteen years old. And, although it sat in the files of the District of Columbia Bar Disciplinary Counsel for many years, during a period when I was not as active as a conservative public interest advocate, it was not coincidentally cynically resurrected when I later formed Freedom Watch and held then President Barack Obama to account under the rule of law, as I had with the Clintons.

In short, the rabidly leftist DC Bar Disciplinary Counsel, which is not only now hard at their nefarious work entertaining bar complaints by a communist law professor Michael Tigar, as well as fellow leftists including former DC Bar presidents, trying to also disbar former Trump White House Counselor Kellyanne Conway, former Trump Attorney General Bill Barr, Republican Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley and of course former Republican and Trump lawyer Rudy Guiliani, was happy to oblige the jealous and insecure Fitton and they became “comrades in arms” against me. To make matters more egregious, during the course of this thirteen year old bar proceeding, Fitton secretly gave DC Bar Disciplinary Counsel records from my former divorce and custody proceeding – which he took from court files – concerning my previous estranged wife, which contained proven false accusations of child sexual abuse – all to try to prejudice and harm me. This had absolutely nothing to do with Fitton’s conflict of interest allegations, but was simply hateful and vindictive.

As a result, despite the ethics opinion of the leading legal ethics expert, Professor Ronald Rotunda [...], which found that I did not commit any ethics infractions and which was given to DC disciplinary authorities and later the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, I was suspended for three months from the practice of law in the capital of corruption, commonly known as the swamp. In this regard I am seeking reconsideration of a recent order of a Clinton appointed, very leftist and hostile judge on the D.C. Circuit, who recommended an additional three months before his court, in contravention of what other courts ruled in terms of reciprocal discipline, which I had already served.

And, if that is not enough of the damage that Fitton has done, he had also filed another bar complaint against me over my representation of Cliven Bundy before another hostile judge, Obama appointed Gloria Navarro, in a case which we ultimately won. A hearing committee, after the initial trial, could find no violation of professional ethics rules, but that did not stop Fitton from trying to have me disbarred – even with a matter that did not involve him and Judicial Watch.

The atmosphere these days in the nation’s capital is toxic and deadly, as the left now controls all three branches of our so-called government, the District of Columbia Bar as well as the courts – a left that has in nine short weeks under Biden and Harris moved the country to not just socialism but also to the brink of communism. The leftist DC Bar disciplinary apparatus is bent on destroying opposition from conservative activist lawyers and Trump backers like me, and apparently non-lawyer Fitton is happy to oblige when it comes to his feigned and feared competitor Larry Klayman – as he apparently wants to try to reduce me to his non-lawyer status, as well as harm my family and me in other ways.

And, of course, leftist fake news media is happy to jump on the bandwagon by writing defamatory articles about these phony bar proceedings. For this, the authors and their publications are being sued, as I will not turn the other cheek to their rank dishonesty. So too have leftist officials of the DC Bar Disciplinary apparatus.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
sterngard friegen
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:51 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#61

Post by sterngard friegen »

Ronald McDonald Rotunda is still dead. I hope GIL Klayman is paying residuals to Rotunda's,estate.
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#62

Post by northland10 »

In his case against all of the judges of the DC Court of Appeals (for temporarily suspending him), the Federal judge issued an OSC on why the case should not be dismissed on grounds of judicial immunity.

I could not read all the way because, 1) time, and 2) I could not handle 7 pages of whining where he did not get to any legal analysis and authorities until 2/3rds of the way into the filing. At least he uses the term egregious (or a variant) at least 5 times in the filing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 9.10.0.pdf

He complains about due process and stuff, but I can definitely understand the DC Court of Appeals decision to cut him off until this is finished. In the appeals court case, he has many requests for extensions. At some point, you can tell he is trying to delay the whole thing.

I wonder if Judge Amy Berman Jackson has been reading up on all his lawsuits against the DC attorney discipline folks. That could make for an interesting order.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#63

Post by northland10 »

In Corsi's case in the WD of Texas, GIL is busy showing his ability to win friends and influence opinions. I sensed a tone of annoyance by the Magistrate Judge in his order quashing the depositions and granting a protective order (the depositions that GIL suddenly pushed at the last second without the proper notice or confer, and while dispositional motions were pending).

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... .100.0.pdf
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#64

Post by Luke »

:lol: Thanks Northland! GIL is brunt toast. Maybe that Grand Slam Grand Jury will make him the big bux.

GIL.JPG
GIL.JPG (111.29 KiB) Viewed 4440 times


Bonus on the DC Court of Appeals. Did he, did he really say this?


GIL Jewish.JPG
GIL Jewish.JPG (43.54 KiB) Viewed 4436 times
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
sterngard friegen
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:51 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#65

Post by sterngard friegen »

GIL Klayman is whatever religion is best for him at the moment. (Pretty much like his "residence.")

What he usually says is he is a Jew who believes in Jesus. Those of us who are real Jews refer to such people as Christians.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#66

Post by bob »

Another episode of Klayman's cosplay:

Mostly just Goodman reading docs. :yawn:

Klayman at the end again pitches his upcoming Constitutional Convention. :yankyank:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#67

Post by realist »

The favorite birther/sov-cit cite to justify the citizens grand juries ... U.S. v Williams. :yankyank:

Yeah, no court is going to go for that one. Didn't then, won't now.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#68

Post by Luke »

It is pretty Orlyesque that GIL has ENLARGED ZIBITS on that graphic! But what would make it truly special and to show he really means it is including this:


Image



Otherwise, it's just LARPing.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#69

Post by bob »

In one of Roy Moore's Alabama defamation lawsuits, he partially staved off a motion to dismiss. Meaning Moore is entitled to discovery!

Klayman hasn't filed anything in this case since July, so Klayman may have handed this case off to local counsel.

Oh: The defendants are represented by Barry Ragsdale and Marc E Elias. :boxing:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

Re: GIL: Klayman

#70

Post by Reality Check »

sterngard friegen wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:05 am GIL Klayman is whatever religion is best for him at the moment. (Pretty much like his "residence.")

What he usually says is he is a Jew who believes in Jesus. Those of us who are real Jews refer to such people as Christians.
Exactly. He can claim to be a persecuted Jew when it is convenient but to his RWNJ Christian followers he can hold up his belief in Jesus. If he thought it benefited him financially he would pray to Allah too.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#71

Post by bob »

Law360: Klayman Says Judge's 'Hostility' Warrants Rehearing His Case. (The D.C. Cir. 90-day suspension.)

The rest is behind a paywall, but it is obviously the Klayman Usual: Seeking Rehearing Because Mad Judge Ruled Against Him. :yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5587
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: GIL: Klayman

#72

Post by Luke »

Why bother with a rehearing? He should just take the case to the Grand Slam Grand Jury. And what an excellent test case it would be... if GIL wins (suspense!), he should just proceed with whatever he wants and ignore the judges. That would be awesome to watch. :P
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#73

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 3:15 pm Law360: Klayman Says Judge's 'Hostility' Warrants Rehearing His Case. (The D.C. Cir. 90-day suspension.)

The rest is behind a paywall, but it is obviously the Klayman Usual: Seeking Rehearing Because Mad Judge Ruled Against Him. :yawn:
Translation (err.. um.. localization if you are into the new buzzwords).

Court says: Follow the rules of the court.

Larry translates: Hostility

Court says: Don't lie to the court

Larry translates: Hostility
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5597
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: GIL: Klayman

#74

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Tue Apr 06, 2021 3:15 pm Law360: Klayman Says Judge's 'Hostility' Warrants Rehearing His Case. (The D.C. Cir. 90-day suspension.)

The rest is behind a paywall, but it is obviously the Klayman Usual: Seeking Rehearing Because Mad Judge Ruled Against Him. :yawn:
For completeness, the petition for rehearing.
In re Klayman petition for rehearing.pdf
(297.86 KiB) Downloaded 77 times
101010 :towel:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: GIL: Klayman

#75

Post by bob »

Klayman wrote:Mr. Klayman was also significantly prejudiced by Judicial Watch being allowed ex parte and in secret - since it was not disclosed to Mr. Klayman for many years - to present pages and pages of irrelevant “evidence,” pertaining to his divorce proceeding that fabricated allegations by his ex-wife that he had sexually abused his child, for which he was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Department of Children’s Services and the District Attorney in Cleveland, Ohio, where his son resided with his deceitful estranged mother, Mr. Klayman’s former wife, who bore false witness.
Lamberth and Rotunda also get the expected namedropping.
Image ImageImage
Post Reply

Return to “Law and Lawsuits”