Issues 2020: Reproductive Rights

User avatar
Addie
Posts: 34306
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:22 am
Location: downstairs

Re: Issues 2020: Reproductive Rights

#26

Post by Addie » Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:38 pm

Slate
The Democrats’ Silent Majority

The debate spent three hours ignoring women’s issues. ...

This was partly the fault of the ABC moderators. They shepherded lengthy and illuminating segments on climate change, anti-black racism, immigration, and gun violence—and overall, they did a much better job than the previous two sets of debate moderators. But they didn’t ask any of the candidates to speak on the Republican Party’s coordinated assault on women’s health care access, the economic strain caused by our lack of universal paid parental leave, or the looming threat of a Supreme Court poised to overturn or substantially weaken Roe v. Wade.

The omission felt particularly glaring in light of the Trump administration’s recent introduction of a domestic gag rule—a policy that denies federal family planning dollars to any health care facility that so much as refers patients for abortion care. Thursday’s debate took place just days after Planned Parenthood, which has been forced to forgo the up to $60 million it’s accepted every year to offer subsidized contraception, announced that it would close two Ohio clinics amid recent state and federal funding rollbacks.

In post-debate tweets, Sen. Kamala Harris and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke both scolded the moderators for neglecting to ask a question about abortion. But there’s no reason why either of them couldn’t have brought it up on their own. Sen. Cory Booker somehow managed to pivot a question about his vegan diet into an appeal for better health care for veterans. At a moment when states in the South and Midwest are outright banning abortion, when Republican legislators are floating the idea of the death penalty for women who terminate their pregnancies, when conservative news outlets—inspired by actual lawmakers—are suggesting that women with life-threatening ectopic pregnancies simply wait them out until they naturally miscarry, anyone on the debate stage would have been forgiven for changing the subject from their own “professional setbacks” to women’s lives.

Viewers would have thanked them for it. Public support for abortion rights is higher than it’s been in two decades, and Trump-era incursions on women’s rights have Democrats raring to vote. In a recent Supermajority/PerryUndem poll of likely 2020 voters, 78 percent of Democratic women and 74 percent of Democratic men said the recent abortion bans in Alabama, Georgia, and elsewhere were motivating them to “[make] sure I vote in the 2020 elections.”

With that in mind, and considering the fact that our current president is an accused rapist, it would have been nice to have someone talking about gender on the stage. Trump’s election set into motion an unprecedented upswelling of women’s political participation, yielding the largest-ever national protest, record gains in legislative representation, and a presidential approval rating gender gap twice as large as it’s ever been in the three decades pollsters have been measuring it. When the Democratic candidates look into the camera during a debate, addressing voters who desperately want to beat Trump, it’s women they’re talking to.

Post Reply

Return to “Presidential Election”