Fogbow

They talked about the possibility of starting early/going late, because Marchan wants to get the case to the jury by early Thursday if not Tues afternoon. Staying late seemed to be preferred to arriving early if i recall.

No sign of this for tomorrow AM.

I still have no idea how they get to the underlying crime without Weisselberg’s corroborating testimony. Even if he lied and or took the Fifth, I still say better than the nothing, it seems to me at least, they presented in that regard. :shrug: I'm quite convinced. There is a paper trail a mile wid...

So I read--and then skimmed--through Cohen's testimony. Takeaways: - Boring as hell. This is a function of Blanche jumping from topic to topic without even trying to make any point other than "you lied, didn't you!" He never stayed on one topic for more than ten minutes; he intentionally a...

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2024 9:22 pm $end money.

Eastman made a mint over the CA disbarment hearings.

This is not the first time he's tried this on. cf. Fulton Cty.

Looks like he has his mother's mouth. Thank god.

I doubt that there was a sign attacking Alito or his wife. If there was an anti-fuckhead sign, I have no problem with it (assuming it wasn't disgusting). If Mary-beth or whatever her name is had words with the neighbors, so what? There is nothing on God's green Earth that justifies a stop the steal ...

And I want to know what the neighbor's sign actually said. https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1791483764998086784 https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1791485016884588918 Thanks, Bob. I had read those tweets -- Shannon Bream is a right-wing writer, with a connection to Fox. I don't know any...

And I want to know what the neighbor's sign actually said.

From the Editorial Desk: "briefly" in no way means "a week". There are a handful of ways to describe a period of time: for a second or two, for a minute, briefly, for a few hours, for the morning (etc.), for half a day, for a day, for a week, etc."

Alito = POS

Honig loves the spotlight. I mean, more than most.

Hope he uses the water riff at a debate.

Followed by needing an ID to buy groceries.

I have a solution for you, CT.

IMO Merchan has to put Mr Hunnybunch on the stand and ask him what he did, then rule on his believability, as Engoron did. If he wants to maintain his principles.

Some wise head said that he won't do it if the DA doesn't ask him to.

And...fuckhead says the debate will be on...Fox.

Oopsie!

First move in the plan to scuttle??? Or a mis-speak?

So, here's the thing. Despite my rapidly advancing age--and despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary--I haven't quite gotten rid of the idea that I'm a font of wisdom (don't judge me). So I find myself thinking, "You've gotta be kidding. No _way_ fuckhead shows up for this. Just like he wo...

noblepa wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 12:37 pm I hope that they put a physical leash on TFG, so that he can not wander around behind President Biden, the way he did in the debate with HRC. I'm not kidding.

Agreed.

Karen FA from Meidas Touch said she heard that Haba was passing notes to the defense table.

Cohen is very much like Trump. No self control. Blanche is sticking it to him and Cohen is decompensating. If Blanche does this too much the jury will start to feel sorry for Cohen. This is not what the reports coming out of the courtroom/overflow room say. Screenshot 2024-05-14 at 4.17.32 PM.jpg S...

I think the media really is working hard to prevent a conviction. They want a horse race in November. It's infuriating. The jury is not supposed to see any media coverage. So they are not supposed to be affected. Isn't that right? Do the IAALs here think there might be a problem? I didn't take the ...

New Lawyer-head eager to give his take, following testimony from Cohen that T said "work it out with Allen" and that he called/spoke with T at every step of the road, supported by call logs and common effing sense: "We still haven't seen any evidence that T directed AW and MC to falsi...

2:22 Monday May 13 PM : Lawyer-head explains that circumstantial evidence is just fine to prove a case (discussing Cohen testifying this discussions with T during the week of Stormy negotiations).

Narrator: And the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.