Fogbow

New Lawyer-head eager to give his take, following testimony from Cohen that T said "work it out with Allen" and that he called/spoke with T at every step of the road, supported by call logs and common effing sense: "We still haven't seen any evidence that T directed AW and MC to falsi...

2:22 Monday May 13 PM : Lawyer-head explains that circumstantial evidence is just fine to prove a case (discussing Cohen testifying this discussions with T during the week of Stormy negotiations).

Narrator: And the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.

Hot take from a bit ago on MSNBC:

Laurence O'Donnell, in the overflow room (I think): T appeared to be looking at his papers, and the top paper appeared to be a picture of the crowd at his rally.

Finally got a couple of MSNBC reporters who were 1) in the courtroom/overflow and 2) are really really familiar with the case: Lisa Rubin: MC credible, calm, a little freaked out and nervous. Hoffinger frequently asking for more, as Cohen is staying strictly in four corners of question. H keeps prod...

Earlier on CNN: Legal head explaining that Defense on cross will be hammering Cohen to prove that fuckhead only did what he, Cohen advised him to do as his lawyer."

Narrator 1: He did not say fuckhead.

Narrator 2: Merchan has already ruled against an advice of counsel defense.

FYIO, I’m fine. I’m in an ambulance taking me from a small hospital to a larger one, there to have my appendix taken out. Simple surgery, I’ll be home tomorrow, or even tonight. A little woozy, or would have started a new thread somewhere. Follow up comments in a different thread, please. More late...

Legal head on MSNBC saying, "Well, this is all well and good, but when will Michael Cohen say what discussions about the cover-up he had with fuckhead?"



When they get to that part of the testimony, you blithering fool?

Narrator: She did not call him "fuckhead."

Kendra wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 12:12 pm

p0rtia wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 11:52 am Lawfare reports that Tuperville and Vance are not present after morning recess.

But, they were there at first? If so, are they now making the rounds at Fox to make comments about what the gagged one can't?

Yes, they were there. No idea where they are grifting now.

Lawfare reports that Tuperville and Vance are not present after morning recess.

Anderson Cooper, who should no better (and maybe he thinks he's playing dumb to represent the audience), wonders why there is no direct evidence of Trump knowing about stuff, except for Cohen, and why should they believe Cohen, who is bla bla bla? (NB Not looking forward to the inevitable discussion...

Monitoring both cnn and msnbc as I read the testimony being tweeted out. Testimony is brisk and full to the brim of detail. Hoffinger doing a great job. Cohen doing his job well, stating without justification or emotion that he bullied people and worked to get contractors to take pennies on the doll...

Thanks, Zeke

interesting interactive media bias chart.

https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-m ... OnPageLink

And yet the headline in the Raw Story article says that Engoron is under investigation. WTF? The article itself implies that _Bailey_ is the one being investigated, although it is grossly ambiguous. What schlock. I've often followed links to Raw Story and taken their reporting seriously, but this on...

I to am looking forward to Cohen's testimony. MSNBC and CNN are devoting most of their days to the trial, reading out (and showing on-screen) the text as it is transcribed by reporters in the courtroom and overflow room. I've followed most days pretty closely, and then read the transcripts, and it's...

He intuitively knows the results can't be trusted.

Intuition. The new MAGA approach to governance. And life.

Medford, MA, May 9

I do watch him but, like his counterpart Ben M, usually not to the end. The one thing that bothers me about him are his in- podcast commercials. I understand the concept. Several other people I watch do their own ads which cannot be clicked through. Yet, something about his delivery grates on me, b...

Michael Popok is an insufferable windbag. He really does put bagpipes to shame. His bloviating is on par with Giuliani, Bongino, and Kirk. Who are also cringe worthy, but well enough to fall asleep to. Hmmm. I listen to most of Popok's pods; they come in at my level of legal understanding. Also, he...

I'm thinking Projection is the last instar of the MAGAt life cycle.

Or maybe the last of the Five Stages of MAGA Grift.

I'll work on it.....

I see Ingraham is auditioning to play the Intendant in the Mirror Universe.

Saw the word, and immediately the back of my head spit this old Star Trek title out - The Trouble with Thuribles I believe it was The Thurible with Tribbles. I remember as clearly as if by the Mandela Effect the scene in which the ship chaplain started swinging the thing and the tribbles came pouri...

Why yes, fuckhead, you can most certainly respond freely to what Ms. Daniels said. Farcical. Katie Phang's comment on Twitter was that Trump has the option to respond to Stormy's narrative, yes, he is free to testify in the trial, those are the rules and that is his right. I'm sorry, my hearing's, ...