Fogbow

Dr. Ken wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 3:06 pm Johnson poised to take Mccarthys place as one of the shortest speakerships

Maybe. Dems vote too.

That old excuse.

I've skimmed many tweets detailing the questions to the jury. Still wondering if I would have gotten on it if I said I had no bias. This pretty much clarifies the issue as No Way José: Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 2.26.32 PM.png Anyone here think that if the defense attorneys got a glimpse of, say, thei...

Fire breaks out near courthouse where tfg's trial is being held. Man on fire. No link. Watching on CNN. :eek: I was just coming to post that. Talk about live reporting, Laura and Evan are on it. Yikes. Looks like someone lit themselves on fire. Disturbing video: https://x.com/simonateba/status/1781...

Their syntax is a quite different. substitute - command of the English language ... One my also assume that Churchill may have read a book or two in his time :o I'll stick with "syntax". More specific, especially for a native speaker, which, presumably, fuckhead is. Screenshot 2024-04-19 ...

Their syntax is a quite different.

My take is jury nullification (I'm not alone in that belief, obviously--a few of the jurors agree, at least in retrospect).

If so, how can you put the onus on judge or prosecution?

Remember thee stunned look on Kardashian's face?

Nicolle Wallace knocked it out of the park in her first hour again. Dealing with the truth that fuckhead is above the law. Right now. Discussing the attack on any and all of societies institutions, joined by powerful allies. Why does the justice system fail to deal with him as they would with anyone...

Wow!

Nature rules.

I disagree. The autocracy is here; it has permeated a huge segment of our social systems. Indeed, the administration (if you mean the Exec Branch), is pushing back more than most.

"legal" moves further along the continuum to "corrupt" every day in the autocracy.

And maybe she can get Ed Meese to testify at the trial and explain how she's exactly right!

But it's exactly the kind of letter the maga mob loves. Cha-ching!

Thanks, Fiascoist,

Highly enlightening tale.

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 9:35 pm Hey, just checking if Dershowitz is still crazy. Yup, shore is.

Acyn @Acyn wrote: Dershowitz: The gag order is unconstitutional. You cannot prevent a defendant from attacking the witnesses…

Elon??? Is that you????

You guys? Anybody think they'd make a great juror in this one? Great ... for whom ? Obviously, "justice," yes; sure. But "good" jurors are routinely bumped by one side or the other due to their perceived ability to "harm" the desired outcome. Engineers, for example. Yo...

So, given the way voir dire is going for this trial, I'm pretty sure I would self-select off the jury. There is no way I could put aside what I know about this case and focus only on the evidence presented. No way I wouldn't find this ass hat guilty. Of course I think I can be "unbiased," ...

I feel strongly that "Conservatism" had nothing to do with it.

Thanks, chancery et al.

Fascinating stuff; could not remotely follow it without your guidance.

For those who missed the reason why they're doing the clear-the-courtroom thing, it's because fuckhead has said he wants to exercise his right to be present during side bars with the individual jurors, should occasions arise when the judge wants a private word. Normally the juror, the judge, and the...

@innercitypress is there.

Already giving local color.