Fogbow

Their syntax is a quite different. substitute - command of the English language ... One my also assume that Churchill may have read a book or two in his time :o I'll stick with "syntax". More specific, especially for a native speaker, which, presumably, fuckhead is. Screenshot 2024-04-19 ...

Their syntax is a quite different.

My take is jury nullification (I'm not alone in that belief, obviously--a few of the jurors agree, at least in retrospect).

If so, how can you put the onus on judge or prosecution?

Remember thee stunned look on Kardashian's face?

Nicolle Wallace knocked it out of the park in her first hour again. Dealing with the truth that fuckhead is above the law. Right now. Discussing the attack on any and all of societies institutions, joined by powerful allies. Why does the justice system fail to deal with him as they would with anyone...

Wow!

Nature rules.

I disagree. The autocracy is here; it has permeated a huge segment of our social systems. Indeed, the administration (if you mean the Exec Branch), is pushing back more than most.

"legal" moves further along the continuum to "corrupt" every day in the autocracy.

And maybe she can get Ed Meese to testify at the trial and explain how she's exactly right!

But it's exactly the kind of letter the maga mob loves. Cha-ching!

Thanks, Fiascoist,

Highly enlightening tale.

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 9:35 pm Hey, just checking if Dershowitz is still crazy. Yup, shore is.

Acyn @Acyn wrote: Dershowitz: The gag order is unconstitutional. You cannot prevent a defendant from attacking the witnesses…

Elon??? Is that you????

You guys? Anybody think they'd make a great juror in this one? Great ... for whom ? Obviously, "justice," yes; sure. But "good" jurors are routinely bumped by one side or the other due to their perceived ability to "harm" the desired outcome. Engineers, for example. Yo...

So, given the way voir dire is going for this trial, I'm pretty sure I would self-select off the jury. There is no way I could put aside what I know about this case and focus only on the evidence presented. No way I wouldn't find this ass hat guilty. Of course I think I can be "unbiased," ...

I feel strongly that "Conservatism" had nothing to do with it.

Thanks, chancery et al.

Fascinating stuff; could not remotely follow it without your guidance.

For those who missed the reason why they're doing the clear-the-courtroom thing, it's because fuckhead has said he wants to exercise his right to be present during side bars with the individual jurors, should occasions arise when the judge wants a private word. Normally the juror, the judge, and the...

@innercitypress is there.

Already giving local color.

The "disturbing" quality has been around for eight years. What I find disturbing is that so much of the media pretends that this is not the status quo; that they refuse to address the fact that disinformation is a cancer on our country. Of they participate daily, so....

https://wapo.st/4ayuwJl free link Small-time investors in Trump’s Truth Social reckon with stock collapse Some Trump supporters who invested in his social media company have seen their share values plunge -— and see it as a test of faith By Drew Harwell April 14, 2024 Jerry Dean McLain first bet on ...

Time for a fact checker. If I understand correctly, he says Bragg was appointed by Soros. Alvin Bragg, DA? He was elected a couple of years ago by the people. Correct. :bag: Getting late. I read your post completely wrong. Somehow saw T--MP where you wrote SOROS. Good god; I'm poisoned.

Kendra wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 7:58 pm Time for a fact checker. If I understand correctly, he says Bragg was appointed by Soros.

Alvin Bragg, DA? He was elected a couple of years ago by the people.

Thanks, all, for the updates.



Except you, fuckhead.