Fogbow

zekeb wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 6:42 pm Isn't it more an issue of "is it your car"? You're liable.

If someone steals your car and causes damage with it, you're probably up to "you're also liable."

noblepa wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 5:48 pm Right now, I don't think that any kind of generalized principle of law can be articulated about such a situation.

Did you turn on the car? You're liable.

Grifters gotta.

538 (ABC): Biden's path to winning the Electoral College runs through the Midwest : He's polling just short of Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania . * * * In 2020, Biden won the national popular vote by 4.5 percentage points, but he won Wisconsin — the state that tipped him over the 270 el...

Isn't this a little early as they aren't even "official" candidates yet? Well, they are official candidates at this point: Candidates for their parties' nominations. ;) But I take your point (and I somewhat agree), in June they'll both still be "presumptive nominees," and not ac...

P&E: “And Ye Shall Know the Truth” : I want to emphasize, to any of you who might read this, the tremendous significance of THE TRUTH. In the purest sense, telling the truth is something that always is the right thing to do. * * * In a related matter, would George H.W. Bush have been constitutio...

To go a step further: A blue check mark almost certainly means you are paying to tweet.

This change made me switch from not blocking to habitually blocking most blue check marks.

Some nimrod told Orly Taitz that he had seen Rahm Emanuel meet with the judge during the Connie Rhodes trial in Georgia (actually, it might have been during the show-cause hearings on sanctions). The “proof” was that the judge was supposedly seen in a Columbus, GA coffee shop with a “dark-completed...

Considering those two factors, together with the ultimate smackdown of the thin-skinned bullies, that simple "LOL, no" email is worth thousands of dollars in attorney's fees. You gotta be a hella lawyer with an airtight case to send something like that, and that's our MikeDunford in actio...

Too also: The second letter (which, admittedly, is more lawyerly) took time to write.

I was just about to ask if that was a legal way to get around a gag order. No, as the order includes people acting of the direction of this defendant. Normally, if it isn't a question of legality, but a question of proof: What is the evidence that these people are acting at the direction of the gag...

And:

Laity wrote: Ankeny was improperly decided. State Courts cannot overrule US Supreme Court Precedents such as Minor, Wong Kim Ark, The Venus, Shanks v. Dupont, et al. Somebody help me here. I've been racking my brain trying to figure out what precedent the Indiana court overruled. Bueller? Bueller? ...

No surprise: the DDC dismissed Ayyaurai's lawsuit.

Grifter gotta, so Ayyadurai filed a NOA.

Given that Ayyadurai is pro per, I expect a dismissal (as moot) from the D.C. Cir. early next year.

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:43 pm Sometimes you wonder how that level of stupidity isn't painful.

Especially considering that isn't even Greene's actual account.

Harris pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in August 2022, admitting that she received $20,000 of the $40,000 that was paid by Project Veritas for personal items belonging to the president’s daughter, Ashley Biden. Snopes has changed the wording and updated its article on the diary to "true&...

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 8:19 am trump should pick Musk as his running mate.

The fan bois on his dumpster-fire site have been saying he should run for president.

But Musk ineligible to serve as president (or vice president).

When this is pointed out, the inevitable response is, "BUT OBAMA!!1!"

P&E comments : I have been trying to find the decision in the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission’s 2015 decision in Laity v. Cruz, Laity v. Rubio (BLC 2015-4). Rick Santorum’s eligibility was also questioned by me. However, after having Santorum’s background explained to me by the Late great At...

P&E: VP Poll: How Many are Constitutionally Eligible? : During live coverage Tuesday of the ongoing trial in New York of former president and leading 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump, “The Benny Show” host Benny Johnson posted a poll he took of listeners’ preferences for Tr...

Executive summary: Mike D 's client believes the original nastygram was sent in bad faith. So the client would like to know either why it wasn't bad faith or how big its check will be.

The jury is not supposed to see any media coverage. So they are not supposed to be affected. Isn't that right? Do the IAALs here think there might be a problem? As in any case, the court orders the jurors not to consume any media about the case. And most don't. It is rare to find a juror who will a...

Now she’s spreading false accusations about the president showering with his daughter. RWNJs have been doing that for a while. While she plainly states her dairy was stolen, she never says the circulated images of its contents are from her dairy. The letter even says, in the second sentence, that s...

Cohen's testimony seems to contain a fair amount of, "The defendant told me...." Which is causing the bird-site pseudolawyers to scream "HEARSAY!!!1!" Despite there being a hearsay exception for statements against penal interest by a party-opponent, or that the statements are bei...

So whack-a-doodle Bailey confronts Engoron with his view of what the applicable law is. Engoron rightfully ignores the babbling idiot, and so the babbling idiot is trying to get Engoron in trouble for having the audacity of not following Bailey's babblings. Major eye roll. :fingerwag: : P&E: Di...

P&E comment : I have been trying to find the decision in the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission’s 2015 decision in Laity v. Cruz, Laity v. Rubio (BLC 2015-4). The Wayback only displays the first page. https://web.archive.org/web/20160313215400/http://sos.nh.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=85...