Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.)

#126

Post by bob » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:41 pm

Whip wrote:
Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:35 pm
published 49 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page between December 2016 and May of last year
wasn't montgomery hacking already finished before then?
Oh, yes. But in 2015, Montgomery sued Risen, and that's when he dumped his "evidence" on the FBI.

The newly revealed text was written in March 2017; Montgomery and Klayman sued the FBI, etc., in June 2017.

In March 2017, however, Corsi was touting Mongomery's data, and of course Zullo, Gallups, Rondeau, etc., breathlessly hashed and rehashed everything. (And, ob., Klayman used this "evidence" to justify yet another :yankyank: filing in his suit against the NSA, which was still barely breathing back then). So the March text may have in response to the slight spike in interest in Montgomery.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.)

#127

Post by bob » Sun Apr 29, 2018 6:27 pm

P&E comment:
Oscar Piper wrote: On April 11, 2018, Klayman filed a notice of appeal of Judge Leon’s decision in Montgomery v. Comey
USCA Case Number 18-5097 for 49 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court, filed by LARRY KLAYMAN. (zrdj)
Klayman needs to file a FOIA request and get a copy of the “Jim” e-mail referred to in the March, 2017 text message. This was before Montgomery filed the original complaint and may be instrumental in the appeal.
:thumbs:


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.)

#128

Post by bob » Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:20 pm

"For completeness": The D.C. Cir. has calendared this case for January 9, 2019.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.)

#129

Post by bob » Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:52 pm

"For completeness": The D.C. Cir. has calendared this case for January 9, 2019.
"For completeness": The panel will be Rogers, Srinivasan, and Pillard.

No word yet on whether there will be oral arguments.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7342
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.)

#130

Post by Northland10 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 6:33 pm

bob wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:52 pm
"For completeness": The D.C. Cir. has calendared this case for January 9, 2019.
"For completeness": The panel will be Rogers, Srinivasan, and Pillard.

No word yet on whether there will be oral arguments.
Oh dear, a Clinton appointee and 2 Obama appointees. GIL will have a sad.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#131

Post by woodworker » Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:02 pm

Well, obviously all three judges need to recuse themselves.


Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
Notorial Dissent
Posts: 11079
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#132

Post by Notorial Dissent » Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:27 am

Wonder how long it will take him to insult all three of them?


The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#133

Post by bob » Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:55 pm

woodworker wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:02 pm
Well, obviously all three judges need to recuse themselves.
Pillard authored the D.C. Cir.'s smackdown in Montgomery v. Risen.

So, clearly, j'recuse!


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
fierceredpanda
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:04 pm
Location: BAR Headquarters - Turn left past the picture of King George III

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#134

Post by fierceredpanda » Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:43 pm

bob wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:55 pm
woodworker wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:02 pm
Well, obviously all three judges need to recuse themselves.
Pillard authored the D.C. Cir.'s smackdown in Montgomery v. Risen.

So, clearly, j'recuse!
J'amused! :lol:


"There's no play here. There's no angle. There's no champagne room. I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor. The math on this is simple; the smaller the mess, the easier it is for me to clean up." -Michael Clayton

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#135

Post by woodworker » Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:21 pm

bob wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:55 pm
woodworker wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:02 pm
Well, obviously all three judges need to recuse themselves.
Pillard authored the D.C. Cir.'s smackdown in Montgomery v. Risen.

So, clearly, j'recuse!
Yes, but only if the SCOTUS had not already ruled that just because a judge ruled against you doesn't make him biased, or present the appearance of bias.


Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
Northland10
Posts: 7342
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:19 am
Location: Chicago area - North burbs

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#136

Post by Northland10 » Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:07 pm

woodworker wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:21 pm
bob wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:55 pm
woodworker wrote:
Thu Dec 27, 2018 8:02 pm
Well, obviously all three judges need to recuse themselves.
Pillard authored the D.C. Cir.'s smackdown in Montgomery v. Risen.

So, clearly, j'recuse!
Yes, but only if the SCOTUS had not already ruled that just because a judge ruled against you doesn't make him biased, or present the appearance of bias.
That's only because SCOTUS has a bunch of leftists and liberals who are biased against GIL's religion and race.


North-land: of the family 10
UCC 1-106 Plural is Singular, Singular is Plural.

User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#137

Post by woodworker » Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:45 pm

Northland10 wrote:
Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:07 pm
woodworker wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:21 pm
bob wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:55 pm

Pillard authored the D.C. Cir.'s smackdown in Montgomery v. Risen.

So, clearly, j'recuse!
Yes, but only if the SCOTUS had not already ruled that just because a judge ruled against you doesn't make him biased, or present the appearance of bias.
That's only because SCOTUS has a bunch of leftists and liberals who are biased against GIL's religion and race.
Which religion would that be?


Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

User avatar
bob
Posts: 25499
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#138

Post by bob » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:03 pm

woodworker wrote:
Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:45 pm
Which religion would that be?
Klayman claims to be "Jewish Christian" (both Jewish and Christian). Which means Christian, unless the Jew card is more advantageous.


Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

User avatar
Whip
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#139

Post by Whip » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:05 pm

all under the umbrella of The Church of the Almighty Dollar.

P.S. send money



BBFlatt
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:34 am

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#140

Post by BBFlatt » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:08 pm

So of course the Christian members of the court discriminate against him because he's Jewish, and the Jewish members because he's Christian.

:brickwallsmall:



User avatar
woodworker
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:54 pm

Re: Montgomery [and Klayman!] v. Comey (D.D.C.; D.C. Cir.)

#141

Post by woodworker » Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:08 pm

And anyone with an IQ of three digits despises him.


Pence / Haley -- 2020 "I Won't Call Her Mother" and "We Will Be The Best Team Ever, But Never Alone Together"

Post Reply

Return to “Other Fringe Groups & Individuals”