Steve Bannon pledges 20k ‘shock troops’ ready to go as he rants that ‘we control this country’ Donald Trump’s former strategist has called on GOP to ‘deconstruct’ the state
Graeme Massie Los Angeles
3 days ago
Donald Trump’s former White House strategist Steve Bannon says he will have 20,000 “shock troops” ready to act as he ranted that “we control this country”.
Mr Bannon made the comments as he said he had rallied Republican supporters to “deconstruct” the state when the party wins the White House again.
“If you’re going to take over the administrative state and deconstruct it, then you have to have shock troops prepared to take it over immediately,” Mr Bannon told NBC.
Mr Bannon spoke to the newly-formed Association of Republican Presidential Appointees, which was formed to help future GOP officials fill thousands fo federal jobs if they win the Oval Office again.
He told the new network that he wanted to see “pre-trained teams ready to jump into federal agencies” at the start of the next GOP presidency.
And he doubled down on the claim on his Monday broadcast on Real America’s Voice.
Patagoniagirl wrote: ↑Thu Oct 07, 2021 9:29 pm
How is Bannon still free?
Because it isn’t illegal to be a seditious Nazi in the USA.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 10:36 pm
by Frater I*I
Well at least they're not hiding the fact that they're fascists now...
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2021 7:04 am
by Mr brolin
So, Good Ole Boy Bannon wants his own version of the Einsatzgruppen within the "Sicherheitsdienst"...?
So same organizational structure I expect to monitor the purity of
Section A (Law and Legal Structures)
Section B (Race and Ethnic Matters)
Section C (Cultural and Religious Matters)
Section D (Industry and Commerce)
Section E (High Society)
It ain't Godwin's Law if it's real.....
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:34 am
by Slim Cognito
The world will be a better place when the old sot finally takes a permanent face plant.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:51 am
by raison de arizona
Bannon to defy subpoena from January 6 committee as Trump urges defiance, sources say
At least two associates of former President Donald Trump have responded to the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection -- with one saying they intend to defy the subpoena, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
Steve Bannon has informed the House committee investigating the US Capitol riot that he will not cooperate with their subpoena to provide related documents, according to a source familiar with the matter. The source characterized Bannon's response as saying he "stands with Trump."
Another source confirmed Bannon responded, as did former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. The source would not characterize Meadows' response. It is not clear if the two others -- Kash Patel and Dan Scavino -- have responded.
Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 9:34 am
The world will be a better place when the old sot finally takes a permanent face plant.
Unfortunately, that applies to a lot of old sots these days, and maybe a few younger ones.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:47 am
by Volkonski
Brandi Buchman
@Brandi_Buchman
·
4m
Here's an update on Steve Bannon’s contempt trial.
An order was issued on the docket on 1/3 confirming his trial date is July 18.
By Jan 14—next week—he must make all discovery requests to the gov’t.
The gov’t has until Jan. 28 to respond.
Brandi Buchman
@Brandi_Buchman
·
4m
- Pretrial motions must be filed before June 17. Oppositions to pretrial July 1. Replies by July 8.
-Any intent by prosecutors to introduce new evidence not yet disclosed is also due by July 8. The same goes for grand jury disclosures and any list of witnesses it plans to call.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 1:48 pm
by RTH10260
IANAL question: Is it usual that the timeline is streched so far out? I guess regular scheduling in filled court calendar. Could the J6 commitee asked for faster proceedings or would that just trigger continuance requests?
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:13 pm
by bob
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 1:48 pm
IANAL question: Is it usual that the timeline is streched so far out? I guess regular scheduling in filled court calendar. Could the J6 commitee asked for faster proceedings or would that just trigger continuance requests?
I don't think the big window is unusual. Busy courts, COVID, etc.
The committee, if course, can ask. But the committee isn't a party to the criminal proceeding, so a denial is very likely.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:51 pm
by raison de arizona
Bannon this morning says the purpose of the Trump rally in AZ today is to pressure the AZ legis to decertify the 2020 Biden electors, then PA, WI, and GA will follow suit and make Biden an illegitimate president in the minds of swing voters heading into the 2022 elections.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 pm
by tek
Thats not how this works.jpg (62.4 KiB) Viewed 5014 times
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:37 pm
by p0rtia
Keep in mind that Bannon's agenda is to end democracy in the USA by undermining the institutions of government.
He is well aware that there was no voter fraud in Arizona or anywhere else. He is committing sedition via whatever conspiracy theory comes to hand in order to further that goal.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:39 pm
by RVInit
Patagoniagirl wrote: ↑Thu Oct 07, 2021 9:29 pm
How is Bannon still free?
Because there is no such thing as the "deep state" as they claim. Except for the one that Trump started planting all over every agency in the federal government.
Bannon this morning says the purpose of the Trump rally in AZ today is to pressure the AZ legis to decertify the 2020 Biden electors, then PA, WI, and GA will follow suit and make Biden an illegitimate president in the minds of swing voters heading into the 2022 elections.
Yeah, good luck with that.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 5:11 am
by notorial dissent
The article I saw on this intimated they were expecting hundreds and thousands to attend. The picture I saw looked more like a snowbird swap meet.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 10:43 am
by p0rtia
notorial dissent wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 5:11 am
The article I saw on this intimated they were expecting hundreds and thousands to attend. The picture I saw looked more like a snowbird swap meet.
Crowd tracker says 15,000. A righty site says 20,000 (which is actually surprising, that they would give a number that low).
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:35 am
by Foggy
Yeah? And how many people showed up for Biden’s rally, huh? They don't talk about that.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:42 am
by pipistrelle
Foggy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:35 am
Yeah? And how many people showed up for Biden’s rally, huh? They don't talk about that.
They do. A lot. This is how they know Trump won. Thousand, nay, millions came out for his rallies. Most popular president ever. Whereas all Biden could get was a couple dozen people in their cars, honking. Lame lame lame. NO ONE voted for him. NO ONE.
Seriously, I see that all the time.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:21 pm
by RTH10260
FWIW - study the mindset of a right wing dreamer
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 5:24 pm
by Chilidog
does anyone recall the story of why Kelly fired Bannon?
I can't find it on Google. It involved a drunk Bannon sleeping in his office and using a waste can as a makeshift toilet.
Edit - cold thumbs
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 5:41 pm
by realist
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:21 pm
FWIW - study the mindset of a right wing dreamer
Read the comments. They're a plethora of stupid.
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:07 pm
by bob
Bannon this morning says the purpose of the Trump rally in AZ today is to pressure the AZ legis to decertify the 2020 Biden electors, then PA, WI, and GA will follow suit and make Biden an illegitimate president in the minds of swing voters heading into the 2022 elections.
So this mythical swing voter will see the loser's surrogates still harping on about the last election and think, "yes, that's the person and energy that we need more of."
Totally plausible, no flaws found.
(It is a ploy to motivate the base. And girft.)
Re: Steve Bannon
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:09 pm
by Patagoniagirl
Did the guy in the video introduce himself as Vlad!?!?
