Estiveo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:21 pmIn almost all cases (99.99999999% of the time) MRIs, CTs, & X-rays are reviewed & diagnosed by a radiologist (a medical doctor who specializes in reading these things), who then gives their findings to your physician. Giving the results to a PA in the meantime is no different.
Laity's officious dumbfuckery is, as is usual for Laity, ill informed, pig-headedly ignorant, & cataclysmically wrong.
To conclude: Laity is an idiot.
I'm so glad you pointed this out. It really bugged me. I had more imaging done this summer than I can count, and I dutifully lugged copies of the CDs around to show to various specialists, but all they wanted was the reading. Unlike Laity, I am smart, so I had copies of the readings to show them too. PS Most of the specialists already had access to the readings electronically, because this is fucking 2023.
Uh, even if Laity's legal urine is accurate, that does not change the fact that Joe Biden is a Natural born citizen, and got elected to the office in his own right.
I guess he could try to explain it away by saying that Joe was VP to an illegal Prez and therefore was actually the President. But that would mean that Nancy Pelosi was President too, and the Legal Brain of the century never noticed when her delicately sculpted behind was in the chair.
Suranis wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 10:22 am
I guess he could try to explain it away by saying that Joe was VP to an illegal Prez and therefore was actually the President. But that would mean that Nancy Pelosi was President too, and the Legal Brain of the century never noticed when her delicately sculpted behind was in the chair.
Pelosi also was complicit; she also fraudulently certified Obama's eligibility.
The actual president for 2009-2016, using Laity's "logic," was the White House assistant night janitor.
Suranis wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 10:22 am
I guess he could try to explain it away by saying that Joe was VP to an illegal Prez and therefore was actually the President. But that would mean that Nancy Pelosi was President too, and the Legal Brain of the century never noticed when her delicately sculpted behind was in the chair.
Pelosi also was complicit; she also fraudulently certified Obama's eligibility.
The actual president for 2009-2016, using Laity's "logic," was the White House assistant night janitor.
bob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:01 pm
The actual president for 2009-2016, using Laity's "logic," was the White House assistant night janitor.
Anna von Strudel will be disappointed that her claims are not recognized by the self-identified preeminent legal authority of Rondeau's eMidden.
Perhaps John Vidurek's41 gang63 should have taken control of the nation sub judice sine qua non83.
At least Laity understands his mission, to keep bob entertained.
____________ 41a.k.a. Darash, a.k.a. that idiot asshole … 63… with the fetid forest of footnotery … 83… et lingua latina, summa cum potente.
A decade and a half after discovering the New York State Board of Elections (NYSBOE) to be misstating a requirement for U.S. presidential candidates, New York resident Robert C. Laity found on Sunday the website continues to misinform the public on that point.
Consulting the “Running for Office” webpage, which begins with the qualifications for “President of the United States,” on Sunday Laity found the first of three requirements included in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution appearing as “Born a citizen” rather than “natural born Citizen.”
* * *
Earlier today, Laity contacted the NYSBOE with the following message:
Laity wrote:15 years after I informed the NYSBOE that the criteria for becoming President is NOT to be “born a citizen” but to be a “Natural Born Citizen”. The criteria is STILL being misrepresented.
Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy are NOT “Natural Born Citizens” of the USA.
Below his name Laity placed a link to [an] article published at The Post & Email in October 2017 demonstrating the NYSBOE’s ongoing inaccurate depiction of the requirement.
Shirley the New York election officials will be moved this time around.
Since publishing our article Sunday regarding New York State citizen and registered voter Robert C. Laity’s 15-year attempt to correct the New York State Board of Elections’ (NYSBOE) erroneous representation of one of the eligibility criteria for the presidency, several citizens have taken action.
* * *
In response on Monday, a reader of this publication contacted the NYSBOE [and wrote:] What part of “No Person except a natural born Citizen,” don’t you understand?
In his message sent to the NYSBOE and this writer Sunday morning, Laity copied in U.S. Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, the Republican House Conference Chair and representative from New York’s 21st congressional district. “I hope to get her involved,” Laity told us early Tuesday morning.
Just after 9:00 AM Tuesday, this writer called the office of New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and left a voice message detailing the NYSBOE’s ongoing dissemination of misinformation regarding presidential eligibility, leaving our complete contact information.
The Post & Email will report if and when any of the contacting parties receives a response.
On Thursday morning, New York State resident and registered voter Robert C. Laity filed a complaint with the state of New Hampshire against Kamala Harris, who ran as Joe Biden’s vice president and currently occupies the position.
The Election Law Complaint Form Laity completed to file his complaint states that its purpose is to “report a violation of Title III of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, or any New Hampshire election laws.”
Laity, who in 2020 filed a legal challenge to Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as vice president based on her birth in Oakland, CA to non-citizen parents, claimed Harris “is disqualified” from again seeking the office. “Kamala Harris is not an Article II Natural Born Citizen* of the United States and cannot legally be on the Ballot in the State of New Hampshire,” Laity submitted as the “basis” of his complaint.
Following an asterisk he placed below the final line of the complaint, Laity wrote, “A Natural Born Citizen is one born in the United States to Parents who are both US Citizens themselves- Minor v. Happersett, USSCt. (1874) Unanimous,” a reference to the 1874 voting-rights case . . . .
On Thursday morning, New York State resident and registered voter Robert C. Laity filed a complaint with the state of New Hampshire against Kamala Harris, who ran as Joe Biden’s vice president and currently occupies the position.
The Election Law Complaint Form Laity completed to file his complaint states that its purpose is to “report a violation of Title III of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, or any New Hampshire election laws.”
Laity, who in 2020 filed a legal challenge to Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as vice president based on her birth in Oakland, CA to non-citizen parents, claimed Harris “is disqualified” from again seeking the office. “Kamala Harris is not an Article II Natural Born Citizen* of the United States and cannot legally be on the Ballot in the State of New Hampshire,” Laity submitted as the “basis” of his complaint.
Following an asterisk he placed below the final line of the complaint, Laity wrote, “A Natural Born Citizen is one born in the United States to Parents who are both US Citizens themselves- Minor v. Happersett, USSCt. (1874) Unanimous,” a reference to the 1874 voting-rights case . . . .
Realist and I had envisioned a serene, delightful holiday, but now we’re a whirlwind of anxiety because THIS MIGHT BE THE MOMENT! TRULY, THIS TIME!
It’s already unbearable that the immense 15 years of strain on the NY BOE might lead them to BREAK – and perhaps even update their website!! Now, Complainant Laity is pulling out all the stops in New Hampshire!
He’s not deceiving anyone, we all know WHO achieved remarkable success in New Hampshire. The California attorney #223433… also known as ORLY TAITZ, INC! ORLY TAITZ, INC Medical NPI 1699298414, a Dentist based in Rancho Santa Margarita, CA.
Other than a few de minimis details, Orly had a TRIUMPH on Friday, November 18th, 2011!
The Great New Hampshire Birther Debacle VICTORY!
tmabomb 2,101 views Nov 29, 2011
What a pitiful, pitiful sight. On Friday, November 18th, 2011, the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission met to certify the candidacy of President Barack Obama. Birthers of the Granite State had been waiting for their chance to finally expose the Kenyan usurper for the traitor he is.
First up: Birther Queen Orly Taitz. Fail. Followed by Rep. Harry Accornero. Nice try. The commission ruling? Obama is certified.
Angry words fly: Traitor, liar, French phrases, rip up the Constitution -- YOU'RE out of order! You better wear a MASK. Rep. Susan DeLemus harasses the Asst. Attorney General and reminds everybody a thousand times she's a representative.
Last, the Republican Birther geniuses gather in the dark to plan their next skirmish in the War Against The African Mastermind. Just about my favorite video of all time: plus ca change you suck. http://thumpandwhip.com
If you haven't been watching Mike Lindell faithfully, you might have missed Mike's helping to fund a pro se who went before the NH Supreme Court about banning voting machines. Aha! New Hampshire again.
We all know how modest Orly Taitz is, but this action has her and Laity's fingerprints all over it!
NH Supreme Court case about ballot-counting machines draws a crowd
By DAVID BROOKS Concord Monitor Published: 11/30/2023 6:58:28 PM Modified: 11/30/2023 6:58:04 PM
The New Hampshire Supreme Court has taken into consideration arguments from an Auburn man that ballot-counting machines shouldn’t be used at polling places because the correct legal underpinning does not exist in New Hampshire’s constitution. Daniel Richard of Auburn, N.H., who is not a lawyer, represented himself in Wednesday’s oral arguments before the court.
The Supreme Court took up the case after Richard appealed a 2022 rejection of his lawsuit by Rockingham County Superior Court. Richard argued Wednesday that a series of federal and state legal precedents mean that requiring the use of the machines by voters would require approval in the state constitution. He wants the state to forbid their use and to alter a number of state election laws, including those covering the use of absentee ballots — he told the Supreme Court that all absentee ballots cast in the state since 1979 are “defective” — and definition of who is a “qualified voter” able to cast ballots is inadequate.
Attorneys for the state and the town of Auburn, which Richard sued along with legislative leaders and Gov. Chris Sununu, dispute his points. Among other things, said Matthew Conley, attorney for the Secretary of State and the state government, there has been “no evidence of injury” — that is, of people being unable to cast a secret ballot because of the existence of the machines.
The oral arguments drew a large and feisty crowd of supporters, several carrying large American flags, some with Plymouth Patriots banners on them, and a number wearing hats supporting Donald Trump. The crowd overflowed the parking lots around the Supreme Court building and filled the 75-person chambers, with at least that many people left outside. Mike McLaughlin, of Plymouth, N.H., was there to support Richard in his quest to make sure elections are fair. “If voting laws — use of machines, registering to vote processes — are being passed without the people’s consent, then you have a government who’s running over people,” he said. “This isn’t the government of the people, by the people, for the people.”
A number of Republican office-holders and supporters have attacked the use of ballot-counting machines in New Hampshire as part of a general pattern of sowing doubt about the legitimacy of elections. New Hampshire has used ballot-counting machines since the 1980s. The Secretary of State’s Office has assured the public, the state’s elections are run fairly, with no evidence of widespread voter fraud. The machines optically register marks made by each voter on their paper ballot and tally the result, leaving the ballot available for recounts. The state has approved two models that towns and cities can buy to replace aging AccuVote machines. Analysis of state elections has shown that they are usually more accurate than counting ballots by hand on election night.
Between Orly Taitz' legal brilliance, Rob Laity's electrifying personality, and Daniel Richard's deep history in New Hampshire, this MIGHT BE the UNIVERSE SHATTERING EVENT we have been panicked about!!
And see how it all ties together so cleverly? It's because of THIS MAN.
Laity Photo.JPG (33.66 KiB) Viewed 14867 times
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
I watched the NH Supreme Court hearing. In my opinion the attorney for the state Matthew Conley did a less than stellar job. Maybe this case wasn't very high on his agenda. As I have learned here though sometimes judges want grill the side that's going to win extra hard because the want to see if the attorneys have done their job. The attorney for the town of Auburn was kind of funny. His argument was essentially "whatever the state attorney says" It was interesting that Auburn had added a box for people like nut job Daniel Richard who don't want their votes to be machine counted. It wasn't enough to satisfy the MAGA imbecile of course.
Joe Leland wrote:President Biden is not on the New Hampshire primary ballot and neither is Vice President Harris (Vice-Presidents are not typically part of the primary process unless they are running for President).
Is this in anticipation of the general election in November 2024?
Laity wrote:It is a notification to the State of New Hampshire that Kamala Harris is NOT an Article II Natural Born Citizen, that any candidacy in New Hampshire that is in conflict with New Hampshire Election Law, is illegal under New Hampshire law.
Furthermore, the endorsement of Harris by their Governor is an illegal endorsement of a constitutionally ineligible candidate in derogation of New Hampshire Election Law.
In other words, by having endorsed Harris, Governor Sununu violated his oath of office to uphold the laws of New Hampshire.
So the governor's expressing an opinion somehow violated a state law? Shirley the ballot commission will be telling the governor that he's wrong toot sweet.
Laity wrote:Biden is one of three listed candidates in the New Hampshire Democratic Primary to be held on January 23, 2024. Harris is his running mate.
Laity implicitly realized the error of his ways and then posted this article about efforts to write Biden's name in for the New Hampshire ballot. But shirley even Dr. Laity, Esq., will concede that if a name must be written in, it isn't "listed."
And, of course, Harris' name appears on no New Hampshire primary ballot.
Laity wrote:Furthermore, the endorsement of Harris by their Governor
New Hampshire Governor Sununu endorsed Ambassador Haley not Vice President Harris. . . .
President Biden’s name is not on the list of candidates (21 as of 11/23) for the Democratic presidential primary. . . .
President Biden chose not to file in New Hampshire but there is a write-in campaign ongoing. Vice-President Harris’ name will not be part of the write-in effort. She will be selected at the national convention.
Laity wrote:The manner in which VPs are “Elected” these days is a departure from the way VPs were elected when the nation was founded. NBC News claimed in 2020 that Harris is an NBC (no pun intended).
They are also advocating for repealing the criteria that a POTUS and VP BE an NBC.
They KNOW I am right about the legal definition of an NBC.
Harris, Ramaswamy and Haley are not eligible. The fact is SCOTUS is evading the issue and Trump won’t even touch it with a ten foot pole.
They place ineligible candidates who are of color in the contest SOLELY and insidiously in order to curtail protests regarding their disqualifications.
This in order to be able to hide behind spurious charges of “Racism”.
As I told Obama when I was accused of being Racist for questioing his bona-fides, one’s race is NOT a license to defraud “We the People”.
It is NOT “Racist” to question the bona-fides of a person who is disqualified from being President., whether Black, Red, Yellow,White or any other variation of color.
"Funny" how only Laity only "questions" only people of color. Or that his imaginary rule affects primarily people of color.
Laity wrote:It appears that I made an error in my previous comment. It was Haley that Sununu endorsed and not Harris. That said, I also have ballot challenges lodged against Haley and Ramaswamy in New Hampshire.
No State should be allowing disqualified candidates to run in offices that they are constitutionally barred from., either as formally registered candidates or write-in candidates. In either case such an election is spurious, fraudulent and illegal on its face.
Laity still doesn't get that Harris isn't running for any office for the New Hampshire primary.
This caught my attention... I check on Van Balian's SovCit videos once in a while for the comedy. This video takes place in ... NORTH TOWAWANDA, NY! Immediately thought Laity went SovCit. While it's not him, it reflects his attitude and demeanor. Maybe this SovCit was on his way to Laity's crib with his DoorDash delivery?
Towawanda.JPG (182.55 KiB) Viewed 11109 times
It's a really enjoyable video. Should I post it to Laity's X feed and ask if he knows the guy?
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
If "sovcits" consider noncommercial driving "traveling" with no need for a license, wouldn't his food delivery gig be commercial and require a license? Asking for a friend.
X 4
s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" 
Shirley the ballot commission will be telling the governor that he's wrong toot sweet. 
