George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:09 am
by Dr. Ken
And then there was video of him in drag
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:31 am
by Danraft
Omg… a Brazilian that can’t dance! Now he’s lost MY vote.
Sigh…
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:28 am
by Slim Cognito
Colbert uses Harvey Guillen (Guillermo from What We Do In The Shadows) and he nails it. Looks just like him, plus has top-notch comedy timing. I adore him in his role as familiar to the vampires of Staten Island.
► Show Spoiler
fakeGeorgeSantos-LateShow.jpg (48.63 KiB) Viewed 803 times
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 2:22 pm
by Dr. Ken
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 2:37 pm
by Kendra
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
George Santos promised reporters a surprise on Tuesday. When he brought coffee and donuts for the journalists staking out his office, it was a letdown. But Santos apparently had another surprise.
Late Tuesday afternoon, Santos’ political operation filed a flurry of amended campaign finance reports, telling the feds, among other things, that a $500,000 loan he gave to his campaign didn’t, in fact, come from his personal funds as he’d previously claimed.
However, while the newly amended filing told us where the funds did not come from, it also raised a new question—where did the money come from?
While both the old and new campaign filings claim that the loans came “from the candidate,” the campaign’s most recent amended filing had ticked the box for “personal funds of the candidate”; on the newly amended filing today, that box is unchecked.
Another amended filing on Tuesday disclosed that a $125,000 “loan from the candidate” in late October also did not come from his “personal funds,” but like the $500,000 question, did not say where the money came from, when the loan was due, or what entity, if any, backed the money.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 6:57 pm
by Gregg
I'm telling you, the $750k never existed. He thought he could write down that the campaign owed him money and then donors money to his campaign could go straight to his pocket. He's not smart enough to know that anyone would check, and I'm not sure he thought he was actually going to win and bring so much attention on himself.
But the $750K, that was just another grift.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:11 pm
by Kendra
Per my teammate
@cbszak
- Rep George Santos (R-NY) was asked why he’s not attending tonight’s White House event for new Members of Congress.
Santos responded: “I just didn't have the time. It was on my schedule.”
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 8:46 pm
by jcolvin2
Gregg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 6:57 pm
I'm telling you, the $750k never existed. He thought he could write down that the campaign owed him money and then donors money to his campaign could go straight to his pocket. He's not smart enough to know that anyone would check, and I'm not sure he thought he was actually going to win and bring so much attention on himself.
But the $750K, that was just another grift.
What you hypothesize sounds like a twist on Mel Brooks' The Producers, with Santos deciding he can make more money with a campaign that flopped than with a winning campaign.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:09 pm
by Phoenix520
He’s stunningly arrogant. Stunningly. I can’t think of his equal.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:26 pm
by Kendra
George Santos arrives at his office with Dunkin Donuts for the press then says, “You can look forward to seeing some cool stuff coming out of this office soon.”
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:35 pm
by Frater I*I
Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:09 pm
He’s stunningly arrogant. Stunningly. I can’t think of his equal.
How about his Furher Trump....?
I think this guy is surpassed by Zee Furher...
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:56 pm
by Suranis
Most pathological liars are arrogant as hell.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
George Santos arrives at his office with Dunkin Donuts for the press then says, “You can look forward to seeing some cool stuff coming out of this office soon.”
The only cool stuff coming out of that office soon would be his ass leaving for good, never to be heard from again.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:38 pm
by Luke
donuts
Lt Col Root Beer and Lt Biscuit say DON'T TOUCH THOSE DONUTS, they could be poison! And now George is stealing Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman's act.
Root Beer Biscuit on the Bed.JPG (81.55 KiB) Viewed 523 times
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:47 pm
by AndyinPA
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:52 am
by p0rtia
Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 9:09 pm
He’s stunningly arrogant. Stunningly. I can’t think of his equal.
When you read the dictionary definition of shameless, you see a picture of George Santos.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:01 am
by jemcanada2
Soon Santos will be saying he IS Jack Burman! Has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?
And Root Beer and Biscuit
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:58 am
by Suranis
Santos probably thinks he can fool the Press and charm them to his side with his Charms and the fact he is smarter than everyone else. Which is how Pathological liars think.
George Santos (R-NY) and his imaginative (but dishonest) résumé
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 11:02 am
by raison de arizona
Manu Raju @mkraju wrote:
Rep. George Santos, in a tense exchange, would not explain to us why he amended his public filings to show that $500K from his contributions did not come from his personal funds.
“Sir -- let's make it very clear: I don't amend anything, I don't touch any of my FEC stuff, right?”
“So don't be disingenuous and report that I did because you know that every campaign hires fiduciaries,” he told me. “So, I'm not aware of that answer and we'll have an answer for the press regarding the amendments in yesterday's” filing.
He refused to explain source of money
Santos also refused to explain his comment that he survived an assasination attempt and a mugging and wouldn’t say whether he filed a police report.
Asked if he had heard from authorities in Brazil: “I have not, I have not heard from a single authority or a single investigation”
Interesting, but I think that, politically, the measure is DOA.
Legally, it may well fall afoul of the Constitution. Courts (including SCOTUS, I believe) have ruled that term limits for Senators or House members are unconsitutional, because they impose new eligibility requirements for the offices, which are not in the Constitution. The states are not allowed to add or subtract from the requirements set forth in the document.
I think it could be argued that requiring a background check, and that a candidate be free of foreign (or even domestic) warrants would be a new eligibility requirement.