US v Peter Navarro

User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#301

Post by raison de arizona »

Kendra wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 10:31 am
Stanley Woodward, an attorney representing Navarro, assailed federal prosecutors for “failing to use Navarro’s preferred honorific,” Mother Jones reports.

“Dr. Navarro, not ‘Mr. Navarro’ as the government has referred to him, is a PhD economist with a degree from Harvard,” Woodward said, according to the report.
I'm certain they all refer to FLOTUS as "Dr." as well...
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#302

Post by raison de arizona »

Peter Navarro @RealPNavarro wrote: Jury in deliberations now. We're in God's hands now. The only thing certain are more legal bills. That's the Democrat's lawfare game.
Will have more once verdict is in. In the meantime,
you can help me fight these weaponized partisan bastards at http://defendpeter.com
Peter Navarro @RealPNavarro wrote: Weaponized doj starts case by waving the J6 bloody shirt rather than arguing the case. No scruples. No surprise.
Fight back at http://defendpeter.com
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#303

Post by raison de arizona »

Drumroll please...
Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney wrote: UPDATE: Navarro and the lawyers have returned to the courtroom. Not immediately clear if it’s a verdict or a jury question.

My understanding is a *verdict* is incoming. The judge has not entered courtroom yet.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3166
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

US v Peter Navarro

#304

Post by MN-Skeptic »

Guilty!

User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#305

Post by raison de arizona »

:bunny:

Sentencing Jan. 12, 2024.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3166
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

US v Peter Navarro

#306

Post by MN-Skeptic »

I didn’t look, but wasn’t the jury out for just a little bit of time?
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

US v Peter Navarro

#307

Post by Dr. Ken »

Waiting for the anarchy princess video
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3166
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

US v Peter Navarro

#308

Post by MN-Skeptic »

I think the jury was out for about 5 hours. And now Navarro’s lawyer wants a mistrial.

User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#309

Post by raison de arizona »

MN-Skeptic wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 4:17 pm I didn’t look, but wasn’t the jury out for just a little bit of time?
One day trial, four hours of deliberation.

Another bozo ready to serve time for tfg.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5704
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

US v Peter Navarro

#310

Post by Luke »

I expect no whining from Peter... he clearly said he was leaving it in God's Hands. God decided: GUILTY.
Luke Johnson 🇺🇸 @Orly_licious

Just as you said, Peter, it was in God's Hands.

God made his decision: GUILTY.

This was God's Will and must be respected.

A jury has found Peter Navarro *guilty* of two counts of criminal contempt of Congress for defying the Jan. 6 select committee.
4:21 PM · Sep 7, 2023




Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Flatpoint High
Posts: 1405
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:58 am
Location: Hotel California, PH523, Galaxy Central, M103
Occupation: professional pain in the ass, voice actor & keeper of the straight face
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#311

Post by Flatpoint High »

It's only "God's Will" when they are acquitted. anything else is "two-tier justice", or "kangaroo court" Witch hunt...
castigat ridendo mores.
VELOCIUS QUAM ASPARAGI COQUANTUR
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4149
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#312

Post by Phoenix520 »

Mistrial? Of course he does, the little baby.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
User avatar
MichaelJ
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:46 am
Location: Colorado
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#313

Post by MichaelJ »

Apparently God didn't get it right the first time. :violin: :roll:
chancery
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:24 pm
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#314

Post by chancery »

Phoenix520 wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 4:42 pm Mistrial? Of course he does, the little baby.

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Meh. That's routine. As Maybenaut aptly said,
Maybenaut wrote: Sat Jul 15, 2023 11:08 am Defense counsel knock on a seemingly closed door all of the time. Sometimes it opens.
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 6920
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

US v Peter Navarro

#315

Post by pipistrelle »

So much drama for two misdemeanor counts.
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

US v Peter Navarro

#316

Post by raison de arizona »

pipistrelle wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:30 pm So much drama for two misdemeanor counts.
Yeahbut MANDATORY MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS IN THE POKEY! :mrgreen:
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Frater I*I
Posts: 3249
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
Contact:

US v Peter Navarro

#317

Post by Frater I*I »

pipistrelle wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:30 pm So much drama for two misdemeanor counts.
But an endless opportunity to grift....
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"

Trent Reznor
User avatar
Maybenaut
Posts: 2651
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:07 am
Location: Maybelot
Verified: ✅✅

US v Peter Navarro

#318

Post by Maybenaut »

pipistrelle wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:30 pm So much drama for two misdemeanor counts.
Perhaps. But the message is (or ought to be) contempt of Congress is a thing, and it’s expensive.
"Hey! We left this England place because it was bogus, and if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too!" -- Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 6920
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

US v Peter Navarro

#319

Post by pipistrelle »

Maybenaut wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 7:41 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:30 pm So much drama for two misdemeanor counts.
Perhaps. But the message is (or ought to be) contempt of Congress is a thing, and it’s expensive.
No argument from me. But the drama. You either did or you didn't. And you clearly didn't, so guilty.
NewMexGirl
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:03 am

US v Peter Navarro

#320

Post by NewMexGirl »

Hey, Pete:

How did it work out for you using Stan Woodward, the lawyer who is representing eleventy gazillion former (and current) Trump associates, with Trump footing the bill? Did ol’ Stan spend a lotta time on your own little case? Unless your interests and Trump’s are in alignment, I would be wondering about that if I were you. :shrug:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5815
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

US v Peter Navarro

#321

Post by northland10 »

MichaelJ wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:34 pm Apparently God didn't get it right the first time. :violin: :roll:
MichaelJ!!! :wave:

Their God has problems with doing what they want. Their god seems to getting it wrong all the time. Funny that.

They need to learn the secret. Play some lovely organ music and God becomes an old softy. Some Bach, Durufle, Frank, Mendelssohn, or Vaughan Williams and God is putty in your hands.

Choral music is also God's great love.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
MichaelJ
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:46 am
Location: Colorado
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#322

Post by MichaelJ »

northland10 wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 10:57 pm
MichaelJ wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 5:34 pm Apparently God didn't get it right the first time. :violin: :roll:
MichaelJ!!! :wave:

Their God has problems with doing what they want. Their god seems to getting it wrong all the time. Funny that.

They need to learn the secret. Play some lovely organ music and God becomes an old softy. Some Bach, Durufle, Frank, Mendelssohn, or Vaughan Williams and God is putty in your hands.

Choral music is also God's great love.
Hi there northland10! :wave:
User avatar
Kriselda Gray
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 10:48 pm
Location: Asgard
Occupation: Aspiring Novelist
Verified:
Contact:

US v Peter Navarro

#323

Post by Kriselda Gray »

Kendra wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 10:31 am
Stanley Woodward, an attorney representing Navarro, assailed federal prosecutors for “failing to use Navarro’s preferred honorific,” Mother Jones reports.

“Dr. Navarro, not ‘Mr. Navarro’ as the government has referred to him, is a PhD economist with a degree from Harvard,” Woodward said, according to the report.
Not that I like being in the position of defending Navarro on ANYTHING, but... IF he actually earned the doctoral degree, I can see being a bit upset to not have it recognized. People were upset when someone suggested that the Jill Biden shouldn't use the "Dr." honorific despite her having earned a doctorate in education. If it's an honorary degree? Fuck him.
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 2715
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

US v Peter Navarro

#324

Post by Ben-Prime »

Kriselda Gray wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 2:22 am
Kendra wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 10:31 am
Stanley Woodward, an attorney representing Navarro, assailed federal prosecutors for “failing to use Navarro’s preferred honorific,” Mother Jones reports.

“Dr. Navarro, not ‘Mr. Navarro’ as the government has referred to him, is a PhD economist with a degree from Harvard,” Woodward said, according to the report.
Not that I like being in the position of defending Navarro on ANYTHING, but... IF he actually earned the doctoral degree, I can see being a bit upset to not have it recognized. People were upset when someone suggested that the Jill Biden shouldn't use the "Dr." honorific despite her having earned a doctorate in education. If it's an honorary degree? Fuck him.
He does apparently have both his MPA and his PHD in Economics from Hah-vahd.
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 11822
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

US v Peter Navarro

#325

Post by Volkonski »

I have no problem with using earned doctorate titles in nonmedical academic environments.

However I see no reason why a defendant's academic degrees should be a consideration when evaluating guilt in a contempt of Congress trial.
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
Post Reply

Return to “The January 6 Insurrection, including Criminal Cases”