s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
That is a remarkable acceptance of reality on his part. There is an implicit admission in that statement, that, in our legal system, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it does. SCOTUS is the final arbiter regarding the interpretation of the document. He also explicitly admits that neither a SCOTUS decision nor an amendment are forthcoming.Luke wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:27 pm Deep Dive Conclusion
All of the foregoing verbiage aside – from the arguments of two very smart former officials of the Solicitor General’s Office to those of your humble servant – the end resolution of the nbC question lies either in a binding decision of the Supreme Court or a ratified amendment of the Constitution. Neither of those two solutions seems likely in the near term, lamentably, because the vast majority of the body politic is simply indifferent to the issue. So the debate will continue. Move along…, nothing to see here. Sad.
noblepa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 5:39 pm That is a remarkable acceptance of reality on his part. There is an implicit admission in that statement, that, in our legal system, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it does. SCOTUS is the final arbiter regarding the interpretation of the document. He also explicitly admits that neither a SCOTUS decision nor an amendment are forthcoming.
One is free to have an opinion on the matter. One is even free to disagree with a SCOTUS interpretation, but that doesn't make your opinion the law, as many birthers and sovcits seem to believe.
Where to start?Tom Arnold wrote:1. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
* * *
2. JOE “BIG GUY” BIDEN.
* * *
3. SECRETARY OF STATE ANTONY BLINKEN.
* * *
4. JOHN PODESTA & STEVE ELMENDORF.
* * *
5. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON.
* * *
6. NANCY PELOSI.
* * *
7. GYORGY SCHWARTZ AKA GEORGE SOROS.
* * *
8. MOST POLITICIANS.*
* * *
9. MOST REPORTERS AND JOURNALISTS.
* * *
10. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA). I could include the Department of Justice (DOJ) in the final of my “ten most wanted.”
Glad that includes the Republicans' presumptive presidential nominee, who literally starts his first criminal trial on Monday.I am not going to name any names. Suffice it to say (and I often do) that a decided majority of our elected and appointed federal government workers (whose salaries we pay) are, pardon the expression, “CROOKS.”
A right-wing meme about Hunter's business deals:
When asked about a 2017 email from one of his business associates proposing that Joe Biden accept a share of profits from a prospective deal with a Chinese energy firm -- the infamous "10 held by H for the big guy" email -- Hunter Biden said the person who sent it, James Gilliar, had no basis for the suggestion.
"I truly don't know what the hell that James was talking about," Hunter Biden said.
s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
Although we'd be accused by the makers of such lists as coming under a certain three-letter agency at the bottom. And paid for by Soros. So make with the
, already.
Like fiddles.Approximately a week ago, The Post & Email implemented a new “Comments” feature with an updated presentation as well as an allowance for more replies to comments to the same article.
* * *
The Post & Email seeks your input: is the new format an improvement over the old? easier to use or read? about the same?
Please leave your thoughts in the “Comments” below![some jerk*] wrote:The spam filter is still too sensitive.
The moderation (and selective disabling) of comments still seems unnecessary.Kerchner wrote:[some jerk] has to be playing more of his boring sociologist type mind games again.This site is not a soap box at the Boston Commons where one can say virtually anything. He knows that. Few if any online sites are “un-moderated”. Of course this newspaper site is moderated. It is an online newspaper. But [some jerk] chooses to play his psych-ops games here.
From what I see of [some jerk] in his continuous gas-lighting and trite at times games on this site, I think [some jerk] is just a whiner, typical “pajama boy” lefty typing in his mother’s cellar and totally wants his way with everything to say and do whatever he wants, … OR … he is simply playing social engineering, gas-lighting mind games here and trying to demean Sharon’s very well run newspaper site, and Sharon directly, in an effort by “[some jerk]” to make it seem like Sharon is unfair in how she moderates this site. Not so, Sharon is very fair and tolerant with what she allows to be posted in this site’s comments, even those by boring, repetitive, misleading, manipulating, disinformation type OBOTs like [some jerk].
Let me give you a comparative example. Sharon Rondeau’s limited moderation of this newspaper site is a lot less strict than far-left sites such as [some jerk]’s buddy “Reality Check’s” site. Check out his “rules” shared below. As for Sharon’s site here, you have to be a really nasty, far-left, mind and language manipulation, comment scrolling, habitual disinformation spreading OBOT troll to get blocked/disabled on this, Sharon’s newspaper site, ThePost&Email.
However, as I mentioned about above and listed below, see how [some jerk]s disinformation side works in their propaganda site(s). For example, see RC’s “rules” update a couple years ago, to the many existing unwritten (keep-out-the-truth from Patriot-Constitutionalists) rules that were there before, at RC’s infamous disinformation website. I think the original RC has passed away. It is now run by some far-left anonymous OBOT sock-puppet. Probably the same person comes on by here to spread disinformation in response to articles that they fear will gain traction. So they have to come here to trash the article and the authors.
That Reality Check (RC) site has been a communist hotbed and hang-out (run now by some anonymous far-left Marxist – just like the past one(s)). It was frequented by red hammer and sickle ball cap wearing Communists like “Foggy” of the infamous Obama fraud supporting FogBow site. And it still is still a home place to plot in background for many of the “natural born Citizen” (“nbC”) Vattel-deNiers that frequent this site and voraciously go after writers and contributors here such as Joseph DeMaio and Sharon Rondeau. Their group of commies and Obama fraud defenders is now smaller but they still operate and plot in anonymity under the direction of, in my opinion, a key Obama connected Director of Disinformation, and member of Team Obama now in its 3rd term:
Reality Check’s (RC’s) site moderation rules [ . . . ]
Reality Check wrote: Glad to see you visit my site. I think my comment rules are very reasonable. There is no doubt about the eligibility of a President who served two full terms and survived over 200 challenges in courts. Just saying "he was not eligible" with nothing to support it is the behavior of a troll. It is like saying the sky is not blue because I say it is not.
I let Birthers comment freely at my blog for over 10 years but I finally had enough of their BS nonsense. However, I recently let Leonard Daenmon (sp?) aka paralegalnm leave dozens of comments but he wasn't able to support a single claim. If someone is not obscene I will let Birthers violate my posted rules but eventually they have to bring something to the table in the way of facts or cogent argument. One lesson I have learned is most Birthers are retired, white, angry trolls who have all day to waste your time with their unsupported claims.
Look at your hero Mario Apuzzo. Mario probably left a million words in comments on various blogs, forums, and articles. Most of them have vaporized in the ether since the internet actually doesn't last forever as people love to say. I am sad to admit the number of hours I spent countering his lack of simple logic as he tried to use precedents like Minor v Happersett to claim Obama was not eligible. Not one attorney in 10,000 thought Apuzzo's claims had any legal merit. He got angry when I asked him to name a single court case he won on eligibility. Not only did he never win a single case but some of his cases were called frivolous.
Sharon, don't worry about approving this one. I have a copy and I will post it over at my blog.
X 4 X 32
