Page 1 of 4
Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 12:29 pm
by Kendra
‘Cowboys for Trump’ founder Couy Griffin stopped by the Trucker’s camp in MD on his way to DC for his J6 trial starting tomorrow. “We’re looking for a big win .. We need to win it. We got to win it. We will win it.”
https://news.yahoo.com/couy-griffin-tri ... 3KWz9UgdRK
On March 21, District 2 Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin is expected to appear in a federal court for his alleged actions on Jan. 6, 2021.
The plaintiff in this case, the federal government, filed a trial brief on March 17 and Griffin's legal team filed a brief response on March 18 in federal court. Both documents were filed just days before the trial's scheduled beginning.
"The defendant joined the mob that entered the area restricted on January 6, 2021 for the safety and security of the Vice President of the United States," the federal government's trial brief states. "At trial, the evidence will prove he acted with knowledge and willfulness when taking those actions on January 6, 2021, and the government will prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 11:00 am
by Kendra
TRIAL today in high-profile Jan 6 case of New Mexico county commissioner Couy Griffin, who's accused of scaling wall & barricade at Capitol... & saying "I love the smell of napalm in the air" near Inaugural stage
A man who accompanied Griffin has immunity, will testify for feds
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 11:49 am
by Slim Cognito
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 11:52 am
by Tiredretiredlawyer
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:05 pm
by Kendra
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:50 pm
by bob
TRIAL today in high-profile Jan 6 case of New Mexico county commissioner Couy Griffin, who's accused of scaling wall & barricade at Capitol... & saying "I love the smell of napalm in the air" near Inaugural stage.
Note to self: When criming, only innocuous movie quotes.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 1:49 pm
by Slim Cognito
Soooo, standing up in the courtroom and shouting, "You can't handle the truth!!!"... not a good idea?
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:12 pm
by Kendra
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:38 pm
by pipistrelle
Need a poll: MacFarlane reports to: CIA FBI DHS, etc.? Or all of the alphabets?
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:01 pm
by LM K
pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:38 pm
Need a poll: McFarlane reports to: CIA FBI DHS, etc.? Or all of the alphabets?
McFarlane is very intelligent. He's able to work with all 26 letter.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:02 pm
by LM K
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:02 pm
by Kendra
pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:38 pm
Need a poll: McFarlane reports to: CIA FBI DHS, etc.? Or all of the alphabets?
?? Are there any credible reports that Prince Andrew was ever in NM, let alone committing alleged crimes in the state?
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:28 pm
by RTH10260
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:02 pm
pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:38 pm
Need a poll: McFarlane reports to: CIA FBI DHS, etc.? Or all of the alphabets?
?? Are there any credible reports that Prince Andrew was ever in NM, let alone committing alleged crimes in the state?
Didn't Epstein own a ranch down there? IIRC it was reported that Prine Andrew was offered an opportunity to visit the ranch alone, with a hostess looking after him...
(ps. the hostess was not underage)
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:34 pm
by Kendra
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:28 pm
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:02 pm
pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 7:38 pm
Need a poll: McFarlane reports to: CIA FBI DHS, etc.? Or all of the alphabets?
?? Are there any credible reports that Prince Andrew was ever in NM, let alone committing alleged crimes in the state?
Didn't Epstein own a ranch down there? IIRC it was reported that Prine Andrew was offered an opportunity to visit the ranch alone, with a hostess looking after him...
(ps. the hostess was not underage)
Yes, he did own a ranch there, not clear If Andrew ever visited. I am willing to be corrected.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:56 pm
by RTH10260
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:34 pm
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:28 pm
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:02 pm
?? Are there any credible reports that Prince Andrew was ever in NM, let alone committing alleged crimes in the state?
Didn't Epstein own a ranch down there? IIRC it was reported that Prine Andrew was offered an opportunity to visit the ranch alone, with a hostess looking after him...
(ps. the hostess was not underage)
Yes, he did own a ranch there, not clear If Andrew ever visited. I am willing to be corrected.
I may have been wrong with "not underageed". Seems to have been one of the alleged Virginia Roberts incidents
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ranch.html
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:02 pm
by Kendra
And...I stand corrected. Thank you. Still, what does Macfarlane have to do with reporting on this? Not exactly his beat.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:43 pm
by RTH10260
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:02 pm
And...I stand corrected. Thank you. Still, what does Macfarlane have to do with reporting on this? Not exactly his beat.
The Griffin guy challenged him rather than answeringa question. MAGA-style everyone who does not agree is a pedophile. And as Griffin is from NM he thought he had a punch line there with the Epstein ranch. But misses far and wide, there is no investigation of any kind open in NM over what happened like fifteen years ago on Epsteins ranch.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:56 pm
by pipistrelle
Kendra wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:02 pm
And...I stand corrected. Thank you. Still, what does Macfarlane have to do with reporting on this? Not exactly his beat.
Deflection.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 10:24 am
by Kendra
Smith says they've agreed with the govt that Pence reached the secure location (the underground loading dock area) at 2:28pm. So that's now an agreed upon fact.
Defense will not present witnesses and Couy Griffin will not be testifying, so they'll move to closing arguments
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:37 am
by Foggy
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:01 pm
by Estiveo
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:13 pm
by Kendra
Count 2: Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds with intent to disrupt orderly conduct of government business - NOT GUILTY, judge announces, finding government failed to meet the elements of the offense
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:52 pm
by Kendra
Noting - the Griffin supporter in the “Release the Kraken” jacket followed after prosecutors outside courthouse. Screaming. No security out here to intervene
Also from Scott on same thread:
In lengthy remarks outside, Griffin says the media is trying to make “January 6 look worse than it was” and then uses phrase “fake news” a bunch. References Prince Andrew….. a lot
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 1:01 pm
by Kendra
Griffin is giving VERY extended remarks. The camera crews appear to be mostly activists with cellphones. Talking about vaccine mandates. And the Holocaust. And then adds: “We need to get (Jan 6 defendants) out of jail.. can’t wait for Trump to be re-elected”
From Scott Macfarlane thread above. Can't wait to see video.
Re: Couy Griffin will be tried for trespassing on the U.S. Capitol grounds beginning Monday
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:45 pm
by bob
Not Griffin per se, but about Otero County (for which Griffin is a commissioner): P&E:
New Mexico State Auditor Responds to Public Records Request:
"CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED"
In the course of gathering information and reporting on the 2020 election audit being conducted in Otero County, NM, earlier this week The Post & Email submitted several public records requests to state officials who have indicated receiving complaints, particularly about the canvassing portion of the audit wherein the “New Mexico Audit Force,” a volunteer group, is attempting to verify voter-roll data by knocking on doors of residents and asking a template of apolitical questions.
* * *
On March 22, The Post & Email made the following Inspection of Public Records Act (IPRA) request to the records custodian of the OSA as indicated on its website:
In the letter at the following link:
https://www.thepostemail.com/wp-content ... 142022.pdf
the Office of the State Auditor writes, on page 2, that “additional concerns brought to our attention suggest that it appears volunteer canvassers at the direction of the contractor are falsely representing themselves as employed by [Otero] County.”
Under New Mexico’s Inspection of Public Records Act (IPRA), I am seeking all records — in video, written or photographic form — considered to constitute the “additional concerns” to which Mr. Beck referred in his letter.
Executive summary: FOAD; HAND.
The full denial:
► Show Spoiler
NWOSA wrote:On March 22, 2022, the Office of the State Auditor (OSA) received the above-referenced IPRA request regarding Otero County and “additional concerns” to which Mr. Beck referred in his letter. Please note the OSA’s examination of these matters remains open and ongoing and the OSA is unable to provide the requested confidential audit documentation, which is excepted from disclosure as further described in this correspondence.
There are numerous reasons why the OSA cannot permit inspection of the requested confidential audit documentation as such documents are not public records for purposes of the IPRA in the context of authority governing the OSA and the practice of public accountancy.
The OSA is in the practice of public accountancy under New Mexico law and subject to applicable laws, rules, and professional standards. The Audit Act, at NMSA 1978, Section 12-6-5, provides final audit reports become public record upon their release. As part of its statutory duties, the OSA is required to promulgate reasonable regulations necessary to carry out the duties of the office, including regulations required for conducting audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. NMSA 1978, § 12-6-12. Those regulations, at 2.2.2.15(A) NMAC, provide in part as follows:
(2) Confidentiality of sources: The identity of a person making a report and associated allegations made directly to the state auditor orally or in writing, or telephonically or in writing through the state auditor’s fraud hotline or website, or through any other means, alleging financial fraud, waste, or abuse in government is confidential audit information and may not be disclosed, except as required by Section 12-6-6 NMSA 1978.
(3) Confidentiality of files: A report alleging financial fraud, waste, or abuse in government that is made directly to the state auditor orally or in writing, or telephonically or in writing through the state auditor’s fraud hotline or website, any resulting special audit, performance audit, attestation engagement or forensic accounting or other non-attest engagement, and all records and files related thereto are confidential audit documentation and may not be disclosed by the OSA or the agency, except to an independent auditor, performance audit team or forensic accounting team in connection with a special audit, performance audit, attestation engagement, forensic accounting engagement, non-attest engagement, or other existing or potential engagement regarding the financial affairs or transactions of an agency. Any information related to a report alleging financial fraud, waste, or abuse in government provided to an independent auditor, performance audit team or forensic accounting team, is considered to be confidential audit or engagement documentation and is subject to confidentiality requirements, including but not limited to requirements under Subsections E and M in Section in 2.2.2.10 NMAC, the Public Accountancy Act, and the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.
The Audit Rule is clear that confidential audit documentation cannot be considered public records as defined in NMSA 1978, Section 14-2-6(G), as to do so would undermine and erode the practice of public accountancy in New Mexico and prevent the OSA from fulfilling its statutory duty to comply with generally accepted auditing standards.
Additionally, New Mexico law is clear as to the ownership and confidentiality of audit documentation, which is another reason audit documentation cannot also be considered public records as defined in NMSA 1978, Section 14-2-6(G). Audit documentation is the property of the responsible certificate holder and is confidential, including under New Mexico’s Public Accountancy Act at NMSA 1978, Sections 61-28B-24 and 25. Public accountancy certificate holders in New Mexico have duties to maintain confidentiality of such information, including to maintain their professional licenses and to avoid potential liability.
If, for the sake of argument, a court were to determine such audit documentation was public record of the OSA, then exceptions to the IPRA as otherwise provided by law would apply to preclude disclosure of the audit documentation at issue. See NMSA 1978, § 14-2-1(H). Because the OSA is in the practice of public accountancy under NMSA 1978, Section 61-28B-17(B), laws, rules, and professional standards apply that all require confidentiality.
Other applicable statutory authority includes the following:
In the courts of the state, no certified public accountant or public accountant shall be permitted to disclose information obtained in the conduct of any examination, audit or other investigation made in a professional capacity …. NMSA 1978, § 38-6-6(C).
New Mexico’s Public Accountancy Act further provides:
A statement, record, schedule, working paper or memorandum made by a certificate or permit holder … shall be the property of the certificate or permit holder … except the report submitted by him to the client and except for a record that is part of the client’s records. NMSA 1978, § 61-28B-25(A).
And:
[A] certificate holder shall not voluntarily disclose information communicated to him …. Such information shall be deemed confidential…. NMSA 1978, § 61-28B-24.
The Public Accountancy Act clearly defines the ownership, confidentiality, and non-transferrable status of audit documentation, and as a result, such documentation cannot also be public records for purposes of the IPRA without creating a conflict in law that would erode public accountancy in New Mexico and prevent the OSA from accomplishing its constitutional and statutory purposes and mandates as an executive branch agency.
Additional persons responsible for the OSA’s position with respect to the confidentiality of the audit documentation at issue and authority governing the OSA and the practice of public accountancy are State Auditor Brian S. Colón, Esq., CFE and General Counsel Jesse Gallegos, Esq.
With this response complete, this IPRA request is closed.