Page 1 of 6

NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:27 am
by raison de arizona
BREAKING: Russia foreign ministry spokeswoman says there will be 'detrimental consequences' if Sweden and Finland try to join NATO

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:51 am
by neeneko
raison de arizona wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:27 am
BREAKING: Russia foreign ministry spokeswoman says there will be 'detrimental consequences' if Sweden and Finland try to join NATO
I wonder how quickly the process could be here. Russia has just made it clear that they will invade countries that MIGHT join NATO, but being a member would likely shield them. So both nations now have an incentive to make it happen, though they might see themselves as having breathing room while Russia is focused elsewhere. Still, as we saw in WW1 and WW2, things can move quickly once shooting has started.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 12:00 pm
by raison de arizona
Michael McFaul @McFaul wrote: Hearing now that NATO's Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) has been activated. Excellent news.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 12:03 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
Sweden and Finland joining NATO would be a direct consequence of Russia invading Ukraine.

NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:09 pm
by Foggy
Wait, wait, Putin can't invade Sweden and Finland, those are WYPIPO.

Actually, Ukrainians might be wypipo, nobody knows what color Ukrainians are. They could be blue for all Americans know about the world.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:13 pm
by jez
Well, my maternal grandmother was Ukranian, and she was paler than I am. And I darn near glow in the dark.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 3:59 pm
by raison de arizona
Huh, interesting.
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1 wrote: NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg says that cyberattacks could trigger Article 5 of the organization's charter, the so-called "commitment clause" that considers an attack on any NATO ally an attack on all.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 4:30 pm
by raison de arizona
This feels big.
Phil Stewart @phildstewart wrote: NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg said the alliance was deploying parts of its combat-ready response force and would continue to send weapons to Ukraine, including air defences "We are now deploying the NATO response force for the first time in the context of collective defence"

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:00 pm
by neeneko
raison de arizona wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 3:59 pm Huh, interesting.
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1 wrote: NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg says that cyberattacks could trigger Article 5 of the organization's charter, the so-called "commitment clause" that considers an attack on any NATO ally an attack on all.
Oh dear. Given that Anonymous, which is mostly US and EU based, has been attacking the Russian government, that could escalate quickly.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 5:02 pm
by raison de arizona
Imma assume this is a rhetorical question.
The Democrats @TheDemocrats wrote: Why did 63 House Republicans vote against a resolution supporting NATO yesterday?

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:37 am
by Ben-Prime
raison de arizona wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 5:02 pm Imma assume this is a rhetorical question.
The Democrats @TheDemocrats wrote: Why did 63 House Republicans vote against a resolution supporting NATO yesterday?
I mean, obviously, yes, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't ask the question loudly to cudgel them with it until the answers are given and then cudgel them with those answers.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 5:31 pm
by Frater I*I
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:37 am :snippity:

I mean, obviously, yes, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't ask the question loudly to cudgel them with it until the answers are given and then cudgel them with those answers.
Or just cudgel them...I'm good with that...

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2022 12:22 am
by Ben-Prime
Frater I*I wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 5:31 pm
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:37 am :snippity:

I mean, obviously, yes, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't ask the question loudly to cudgel them with it until the answers are given and then cudgel them with those answers.
Or just cudgel them...I'm good with that...
I mean, I won't lie, there was intentionally a theme there to be grabbed and with which to be run. :thumbsup:

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 4:26 pm
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 12:55 pm
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:08 am
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:09 am
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 4:41 pm
by raison de arizona


Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 4:44 pm
by raison de arizona
In the meantime...
NATO warships arrive at Finnish port for training exercises

Three NATO warships arrived in the southwestern Finnish port of of Turku on Monday to train with Finland's navy as Helsinki considers the possibility of joining the U.S.-led alliance amid increased tensions with Russia over Ukraine.

Latvian minelayer LVNS Virsaitis and minehunters Estonian ENS Sakala and Dutch HNLMS Schiedam will train with two minehunters from Finland's coastal fleet, the Finnish defence forces said in a statement.

The two-day exercise, set to commence on April 28, will prepare the Finnish ships to take part in NATO response forces in 2022 and focus on "mine countermeasures and working in a multinational framework", the statement said.
:snippity:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/na ... 022-04-25/

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 6:06 pm
by Slim Cognito
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:37 am
raison de arizona wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 5:02 pm Imma assume this is a rhetorical question.
The Democrats @TheDemocrats wrote: Why did 63 House Republicans vote against a resolution supporting NATO yesterday?
I mean, obviously, yes, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't ask the question loudly to cudgel them with it until the answers are given and then cudgel them with those answers.
Cudgel approved.

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:12 pm
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:16 pm
by Volkonski
I think NATO should embrace independence for Kaliningrad. It is obvious from its location that it has traditionally been part of Germany and Poland.

;)

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 12:37 pm
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 5:11 am
by Volkonski

Re: NATO - what does the future hold?

Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 2:01 pm
by Volkonski