EO making Administrative Law Judges political Appointees

Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 16336
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:04 am

EO making Administrative Law Judges political Appointees


Post by Suranis » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:29 pm

https://twitter.com/andrewfeinberg/stat ... 5563836416
Andrew Feinberg
‏Verified account @AndrewFeinberg
BREAKING: @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse releases Executive Order to end competitive selection process for Administrative Law Judges, making them political appointees who can be fired at will.
12:12 PM - 10 Jul 2018
The EO

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... e-service/

Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

User avatar
Posts: 2999
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:41 pm

Re: EO making Administrative Law Judges political Appointees


Post by Dan1100 » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:43 pm

Andrew Feinberg Verified account @AndrewFeinberg

Andrew Feinberg Retweeted Andrew Feinberg

A White House official emailed me to nitpick about this, so I’ll clarify. CURRENT Admistrativr Law Judges will still be protected under rules that existed prior to the EO.

NEW ALJs appointed after today will be exempt from civil service regs governing removal.
Still bad.

Someone know if the APA says anything about this?

"The moment I found out Trump could tweet himself was comparable to the moment in 'Jurassic Park' when Dr. Grant realized that velociraptors could open doors."

-Justin McConney, Trump's 1st Social Media Manager

User avatar
Posts: 25751
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: EO making Administrative Law Judges political Appointees


Post by bob » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:47 pm

Fed. Times:
The order is based on a June 21 Supreme Court ruling in “Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission” that ALJs are “officers of the United States” and therefore subject to the Constitution’s Appointment’s Clause.

“The role of ALJs, however, has increased over time and ALJ decisions have, with increasing frequency, become the final word of the agencies they serve. Given this expanding responsibility for important agency adjudications, and as recognized by the Supreme Court in ‘Lucia,’ at least some and perhaps all ALJs are ‘Officers of the United States’ and thus subject to the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, which governs who may appoint such officials,” Trump wrote in the executive order.

“Placing the position of ALJ in the excepted service will mitigate concerns about undue limitations on the selection of ALJs, reduce the likelihood of successful Appointments Clause challenges, and forestall litigation in which such concerns have been or might be raised.”
The executive order. Whether Lucia's holding can be extended that far, of course, likely will be the subject of further litigation. (To the extent the APA might govern, the anticipated argument would be that those portions of it are now unconstitutional in light of Lucia.)

As this National Review article notes, Justice Breyer predicted that Lucia would lead to the undermining of ALJs. It took less than a month to prove him correct.

While Lucia focused on SEC ALJs, all ALJs are included in the executive order -- including the immigration judges.

Imagex6 Imagex2 Imagex4 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Trump Administration”