Fogbow

bob wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:30 pm

orlylicious wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:14 pm Did NOT see the required reply in the T v US case, but one of the dotard's lawyers filed a change of address and is like down the street. No, not going there!

I looked on a map; it is a (nice) condo building.

Most lawyers employed by big firms list for an address ... their firm's address.

She changed her email address.

qbawl wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 6:33 pm

New Turtle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 4:54 pm A FPOTUS can declassify any document by affixing a 2-cent stamp on the corner and faxing it to a court of record at the earliest convenience. it says so in the Magna MAGA Carta.

FIFY

Does the magic wand get a 2¢ stamp too, also?

Foggy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:42 pm Okay, so we know what the title of the document Trump’s lawyers are supposed to file today in Judge Cannon's Court is - it should be called, according to her order, Plaintiff's Supplement to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief. Or something similar.

And we know what is supposed to be in it, according to her order.


And we know that Trump has nothing but a heapin' helpin' of hooey, which is not what the judge appears to expect.

They did manage to get a Summons filed. No Proof of Service.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 3.26.0.pdf

Just an amazing turn of events that Tom Fitton may end up getting Trump indicted. Incredible stuff.

Greatgrey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:55 pm She changed her email address.

I know. All crumbs suggesting she's been fired.

As the clock ticks towards the midnight court deadline to file a response about Trump’s request for a Special Master, his crack legal team is busy at work on [checks notes] FoxNews.

Don’t worry. I’m sure the filing will be a legal tour de f̶a̶r̶c̶e̶ force.

TweetAbove wrote:Watters: Did you learn anything from this document?
Habba: Yeah, I learned that we were right.. Did you know the Presidential Records Act doesn’t even have a fine or penalty in place…

Sound like the lady for the first time even bothered to read the PRA. Why would anyone even think that a former potus would have to be threatened with drawing, hanging and quartering

Kash Patel complains that his name was not redacted from the affidavit, saying DOJ “jeopardized my safety.”

Trump’s Supplemental Filing has just been posted. Haven’t read yet.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 3.28.0.pdf

Angry Staffer
@Angry_Staffer
·
16m
I didn’t see Kash Patel’s unredacted name being in there, but I’m glad it was, and I hope it’s an indication that he’ll be indicted soon.

Out of every person I’ve ever met, I don’t think I dislike anymore more than Kash Patel.

And I’ve met Stephen Miller.

Foggy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:42 pm Okay, so we know what the title of the document Trump’s lawyers are supposed to file today in Judge Cannon's Court is - it should be called, according to her order, Plaintiff's Supplement to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief. Or something similar.

And we know what is supposed to be in it, according to her order.


And we know that Trump has nothing but a heapin' helpin' of hooey, which is not what the judge appears to expect.

So, once upon a time in a land far, far away, I had to take a semester of Business Law at that little ole private university in the ghetto of south central El Lay. Now, for all you real lawyers out there in teevee land, Business Law was an extremely watered-down version of contracts, negotiable instruments, torts, parol evidence (whatever the eff that is) and the Statute of Frauds (I looked; I cannot find a statute titled, "Statute of Frauds," but I digress) among other things.

I approached this class like I approached other classes--objectively. I was good with numbers; numbers don't lie; 2*2 always equals 4. Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are equal. I was good with science; I could figger out redox reactions; I understood how plants grew; I knew the various categories of flora and fauna.

I sucked big-time on the mid-term in Business Law. Got sumpin' like a 48/100. There was a note, "SEE ME" in red written boldly on the first page. I sheepishly went to the instructor. She told me, you know this stuff, but you sure don't show it on the exam. I asked what was wrong. She then told me the punch line: Lawyers have to consider all possible permutations of applying the law to the facts as they advance their positions. Lawyers have to be able to argue away opposing viewpoints, no matter how strong or weak they are.

So, she made me a deal: If I get an A on the final, she will tear up the midterm grade and give me an A for the class. If I do not, then the midterm score of 48 will count towards my final grade. (The midterm was 40%). Well, I got a 98/100 on the final.

I politely declined her offer to take the LSAT. I was not and continue not to be cut out for the law. But I can still nail those redox reactions!

I guess if I can figure out what the instructor wants and do it, people with law licenses should be able to figure out what the judge wants, amirite?

Greatgrey wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 8:17 pm Not taking things well.

Donald Trump Jr. posted a picture on Instagram of his father with the caption “Redact this,” and a black box over his crotch.

This is just really weird. What son posts sexual innuendo about their own father’s penis? Is this the grooming they keep talking about?

Who is he trying to kid with that redaction? It doesn’t take that much ink to cover up a tiny mushroom.

What son posts sexual innuendo about their own father’s penis?

He’s always been jealous of the attention he gives to Ivanka.

Yup, as mentioned above, here it is! 12 pages:

28 Aug 26, 2022 SUPPLEMENT to 1 Complaint and 10 Court Order by Donald J. Trump (Halligan, Lindsey) (Entered: 08/26/2022)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_3.pdf


Uploaded it for ease:
Big episode of The 11th Hour coming up. If you don't have MSNBC, you can stream it here: https://ustvgo.tv/msnbc/. Super-Sized Salon reruns on WEtv at 1am Eastern so you can watch both!!


11th Hour @11thHour 1h
A redacted affidavit reveals 184 classified docs returned by Trump is what prompted the Mar-a-Lago search. We look at the political fallout & what’s next @AliciaMenendez anchors @peterbakernyt @harrylitman @tracy_walder @FrankFigliuzzi1 @JulianCastro @adrienneelrod @BeschlossDC

Just spent half an hour on Mike's stream while he did a prelim review, contributing a few comments.

Bottom line, it's weak.

And they're showing no sign of doing and saying the things that persuade a court that it's an emergency that justifies an injunction. To the contrary ...

I’d forgotten this.

To their credit, this is better than their initial paper throwing. (Faint praise damning.)

The assertion of privilege is weak, and the feds already said it has a taint team.

The request for a more particular list of items seized is ... fine. Now that the feebs have had nearly three weeks to live with the seized materials, this doesn't seem like a big deal (subject to expected privacy/security concerns).

Thread…

That Twitter thread kinda buries the lede: Espionage Act, which is criminal and referenced in the search warrant that led to the search.

Noting that his team continues to wrongly focused on the PRA is interesting, sure, but doesn't provide much insight into how the court will view the motion in front of it.

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 11:08 pm I’d forgotten this.

I was reading the article, and it's talking about the large number of captures and kills being in "the last few years." So it isn't something that only arose since Trump took the docs.

Here's a gift link to the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/us/p ... =share-url

Kriselda Gray wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:42 am

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 11:08 pm I’d forgotten this.

I was reading the article, and it's talking about the large number of captures and kills being in "the last few years." So it isn't something that only arose since Trump took the docs.

Here's a gift link to the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/us/p ... =share-url

I believe this twitterer means well, but he tends to jump on ideas a bit too quickly.

Kriselda Gray wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:42 am I was reading the article, and it's talking about the large number of captures and kills being in "the last few years." So it isn't something that only arose since Trump took the docs.

But possibly since Trump started mishandling classified information back in 2016 or so?

tek wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 5:53 am

Kriselda Gray wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:42 am I was reading the article, and it's talking about the large number of captures and kills being in "the last few years." So it isn't something that only arose since Trump took the docs.

But possibly since Trump started mishandling classified information back in 2016 or so?

That I can't say as it didn't give any kind of start date that I saw. But I imagine it's at least possible.

tek wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 5:53 am

Kriselda Gray wrote: ↑Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:42 am I was reading the article, and it's talking about the large number of captures and kills being in "the last few years." So it isn't something that only arose since Trump took the docs.

But possibly since Trump started mishandling classified information back in 2016 or so?

This. It's always been this.