Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
http://thefogbow.com/forum/
"9-1-1, what's your emergency?"raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:42 amClerk to Habba:
"Counselor, when the judge speaks, you need to stop speaking."
I have
Her big "break" was being hired to sue NYT, Mary, etc. Was she on NewsMax before then?
That's pretty much what Alina Habba's MO was. She made several "How can you do this!" barks at the judge. Her messagge was "This whole case is unconstitutional." The judge repeatedly asked her to explain why, but her answers fizzled.
We know all this because state Attorney General Tish James, in gamely pursuing a civil case against The Trump Organization and trying to convince the judge to order the testimony of Donald, Don Jr. and Ivanka, submitted Mazars’ Feb. 9 kiss-off letter to Trump to the court docket — and public view.
It would be really nice if the public also got to see the suspect records that Mazars has repudiated, particularly Trump’s secret tax returns. James must have them, as does Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, since Trump lost his effort before the U.S. Supreme Court to withhold the files. The financial documents could be evidence, which would all come out in a future legal action. Longtime Trump financial shenanigans chronicler David Cay Johnston predicts that Bragg’s grand jury is eventually going to indict Trump for racketeering. Sounds like a good fit.
I don't remember anything about Mazars repudiating any of the Trump Organization's tax returns. Did I miss something?Volkonski wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:32 pm Throw the books at him: Trump’s business fortune begins to unravel
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny- ... story.html
We know all this because state Attorney General Tish James, in gamely pursuing a civil case against The Trump Organization and trying to convince the judge to order the testimony of Donald, Don Jr. and Ivanka, submitted Mazars’ Feb. 9 kiss-off letter to Trump to the court docket — and public view.
It would be really nice if the public also got to see the suspect records that Mazars has repudiated, particularly Trump’s secret tax returns. James must have them, as does Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, since Trump lost his effort before the U.S. Supreme Court to withhold the files. The financial documents could be evidence, which would all come out in a future legal action. Longtime Trump financial shenanigans chronicler David Cay Johnston predicts that Bragg’s grand jury is eventually going to indict Trump for racketeering. Sounds like a good fit.
https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/ ... 82.#page=2much ado wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:53 pmI don't remember anything about Mazars repudiating any of the Trump Organization's tax returns. Did I miss something?Volkonski wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:32 pm Throw the books at him: Trump’s business fortune begins to unravel
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny- ... story.html
We know all this because state Attorney General Tish James, in gamely pursuing a civil case against The Trump Organization and trying to convince the judge to order the testimony of Donald, Don Jr. and Ivanka, submitted Mazars’ Feb. 9 kiss-off letter to Trump to the court docket — and public view.
It would be really nice if the public also got to see the suspect records that Mazars has repudiated, particularly Trump’s secret tax returns. James must have them, as does Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, since Trump lost his effort before the U.S. Supreme Court to withhold the files. The financial documents could be evidence, which would all come out in a future legal action. Longtime Trump financial shenanigans chronicler David Cay Johnston predicts that Bragg’s grand jury is eventually going to indict Trump for racketeering. Sounds like a good fit.
That would be quite serious, I think.
Yes it is. And thanks for posting about the live hearing. I'm sure I'm not alone in saying that I adore this stuff (and this one was, I thought, a doozy) and like to catch them when possible.filly wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:43 amGlad you got there. I am in on the link. It's all good.p0rtia wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:34 amGot in on a different link:
http://wowza.nycourts.gov/VirtualCourt/ ... t-nysupcv1
Password works (7349)
Bravo and thank you to wonderful p0tia and filly.p0rtia wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:37 pmYes it is. And thanks for posting about the live hearing. I'm sure I'm not alone in saying that I adore this stuff (and this one was, I thought, a doozy) and like to catch them when possible.filly wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:43 amGlad you got there. I am in on the link. It's all good.p0rtia wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:34 am
Got in on a different link:
http://wowza.nycourts.gov/VirtualCourt/ ... t-nysupcv1
Password works (7349)
He's welcome to take the 5th 500 times like Eric did.northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:50 pm I have reflected briefly on what was mentioned, I and am thinking of what is really being asked (IANAL). They are arguing that Trump is in the protected class called "won't shut the fuck up" so they are trying to use that to keep him away from any direct questioning. They are afraid that if he sits for a depo, instead of running to the 5th as the judge suggested, he will end up incriminating himself all over the floor.
They want the court to protect Trump from Trump.
After the hearing,
@MichaelCohen212
called me to respond to this:
"Habba's mischaracterization of me as 'discredited' reeks of desperation. Trump's financial impropriety may be an allegation but very soon will be a reality. Numbers don't lie. People do."
Shouldn't be a surprise, but these are strange times.BREAKING:
A Manhattan judge DENIES a motion to quash subpoenas and depositions against Donald Trump and his children.
BREAKING:
A Manhattan judge DENIES a motion to quash subpoenas and depositions against Donald Trump and his children.
Story soon,
@LawCrimeNews
.
ICYMI, from this morning's hearing: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/do ... ostpopular
I didn't catch that, but in a sense they were arguing something similar to that: that he would have to talk because there would be horror on the part of the press if he took the fifth, so he couldn't --which was a violation of his 1A rights. Too also, James is a meany. And actually all we really want to do is to bluster and delay. (IANALE)northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:50 pm
I have reflected briefly on what was mentioned, I and am thinking of what is really being asked (IANAL). They are arguing that Trump is in the protected class called "won't shut the fuck up" so they are trying to use that to keep him away from any direct questioning. They are afraid that if he sits for a depo, instead of running to the 5th as the judge suggested, he will end up incriminating himself all over the floor.
They want the court to protect Trump from Trump.
Cool, and not surprising, having watched the hearing. Of note is the fact that the judge has basically adopted the AG's suggested schedule for depositions.Kendra wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:08 pm
BREAKING:
A Manhattan judge DENIES a motion to quash subpoenas and depositions against Donald Trump and his children.
Story soon,
@LawCrimeNews
.
ICYMI, from this morning's hearing: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/do ... ostpopular
You have a much higher opinion of tfg than I.W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:24 pm I'm putting the over/under at 10 for number of times he perjures himself during the depostion.
