Fogbow

Dave from down under wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:54 pm Good luck convincing anyone with 2 brain cells that they aren't “overwrought, dangerous lunatics”.

Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:28 pm

Dave from down under wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:54 pm Good luck convincing anyone with 2 brain cells that they aren't “overwrought, dangerous lunatics”.

Are they objecting to the entire phrase or do they only contest "overwrought" while conceding that they are indeed"dangerous lunatics", as is blindingly obvious?

Failing to use the "corrected brief" event will result in a request for correction and could delay the progress of the appeal.

Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:09 pm I'm not a lawya, so maybe I'm misreading the clerk's letter when stripped of the fifty cents words as:

Dear Counsel,
You are a fuckin' moron.
Pull you finger head out of your ass, now.
Sincerely yours
A clerk with many better things to do

Foggy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 3:29 pm And there are times when that's mercilessly logical. If you knew A, which we can prove, and you knew B, which we can prove, then YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN C, because C was definitely predictable if you knew A and B.


Example: The birthers knew that Obama's father was not a citizen. That was not a secret, in fact it was part of his basic story, the story he wrote an entire book about, called "Dreams From My Father". NOBODY EVER suggested that his father was ever a US citizen. And nobody ever said, "Hey, if his dad wasn't a citizen he can't be a natural born citizen" until AFTER THE ELECTION.

So the birthers should have known that the fake imaginary "born on US soil to two US citizens" rule was FAKE, IMAGINARY, AND STUPID.

humblescribe wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 3:22 pm Thank you Bob.

I find it ironic that in many complaints, a key locution used by counsel over and over is, "So-and-so knew or should have known thus and such.

Notorious “Kraken” attorney and a key spreader of lies about the 2020 presidential election Sidney Powell claimed in a fundraising video this week that police fired tear gas toward rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, to drive them into the Capitol.

That’s what she has “heard,” anyway, said Donald Trump’s former campaign attorney, and she’s looking for a handout to further investigate the reports on behalf of the Jan. 6 defendants. (Powell later removed the video from the website of her nonprofit organization Defending the Republic.)

Powell could also use those extra funds for her own mounting legal battles.

Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3 billion defamation suit against her over her “wild accusations” that the company rigged the presidential election against Trump. The company has since accused Powell of raiding funds from Defending the Republic to pay her own legal fees.

Shizzle Popped wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 2:23 pm 'Kraken' Lawyer Sidney Powell Says Cops Fired Tear Gas To Force Jan. 6 Rioters Into Capitol

The Attorneys' unsupported speculation that the district court did not exercise its authority in good faith is unfounded, particularly considering the district court's painstaking analysis in support of its sanctions order and its sua sponte recognition that a stay of the monetary portion of the judgment was appropriate.

W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:39 pm Wonder what happens if they fail to complete their re-education continuing education before end of day tomorrow?