Page 15 of 40

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2023 6:10 pm
by Luke
Thanks, Much Ado... tpyo.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
by Gregg
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm
much ado wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:56 pm Should we have a separate thread for Trump Truths and X-crements?
Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:10 pm
by Kendra
Just heard on the teevee, the Georgia judge has ruled that court stuff will be live streamed :popcorn:

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:51 pm
by realist
Kendra wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:10 pm Just heard on the teevee, the Georgia judge has ruled that court stuff will be live streamed :popcorn:
Indeed.
Former President Donald Trump’s election interference trial in Fulton County, Georgia, will be broadcast live on the court’s YouTube channel, Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee said Thursday, the latest factor that could make the case a public spectacle unlike any of Trump’s three other criminal cases.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1g3Arz

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:20 pm
by bill_g
MAGAts will hate YouTube and Google for that.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:20 pm
by Ben-Prime
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm
much ado wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:56 pm Should we have a separate thread for Trump Truths and X-crements?
Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
Wouldn't Alcatraz have a great view of San Francisco for him to look at everyday and think "Why, that Nancy Pelosi must sure be having fun today!"?

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:47 pm
by Flatpoint High
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:20 pm
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm

Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
Wouldn't Alcatraz have a great view of San Francisco for him to look at everyday and think "Why, that Nancy Pelosi must sure be having fun today!"?
The Pelicans wouldn't' appreciate it.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:50 pm
by pipistrelle
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:20 pm
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm

Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
Wouldn't Alcatraz have a great view of San Francisco for him to look at everyday and think "Why, that Nancy Pelosi must sure be having fun today!"?
When I toured Alcatraz, I kept thinking that it would be torture to be incarcerated there. Great view of San Francisco, where all the bars and vice are. So close.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 6:14 am
by Ben-Prime
pipistrelle wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:50 pm
Ben-Prime wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 7:20 pm
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm

Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
Wouldn't Alcatraz have a great view of San Francisco for him to look at everyday and think "Why, that Nancy Pelosi must sure be having fun today!"?
When I toured Alcatraz, I kept thinking that it would be torture to be incarcerated there. Great view of San Francisco, where all the bars and vice are. So close.
In TFG's case, a TwiX-enabled cell phone and a case of diet coke would have to be mounted on an anchored bouy just a few dozen meters outside his cell bars.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:32 am
by Foggy
Oh, yeah, Twix. Great candy bar, I read it was a contraction of "twin sticks".

But what's a TwiX-enabled cell phone? The phone is sticky? It runs on candy?

I googed a little, no love.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:36 am
by tek
Foggy wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:32 am Oh, yeah, Twix. Great candy bar, I read it was a contraction of "twin sticks".

But what's a TwiX-enabled cell phone? The phone is sticky? It runs on candy?

I googed a little, no love.
Xitter I suspect.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:43 am
by Foggy
I suspect it's some sorta encrypted gubmint phone.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:21 am
by Kriselda Gray
Foggy wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:43 am I suspect it's some sorta encrypted gubmint phone.
It's a shorthand portmanteau of Twitter and X = TwitterX = TwiX :)

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:26 am
by bill_g
I prefer the word Xcrement. But that's just me. In polite company Twix would be the better choice. What the Mars Co has to say about it is a different matter.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:48 am
by W. Kevin Vicklund
bill_g wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:26 am I prefer the word Xcrement. But that's just me. In polite company Twix would be the better choice. What the Mars Co has to say about it is a different matter.
I thought the agreement was Xitter is the site, an Xcrement (plural: Xcrement) was the individual entry. "I see TRump dropped another load of Xcrement in the Xitter last night."

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:51 am
by bill_g
W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:48 am
bill_g wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 9:26 am I prefer the word Xcrement. But that's just me. In polite company Twix would be the better choice. What the Mars Co has to say about it is a different matter.
I thought the agreement was Xitter is the site, an Xcrement (plural: Xcrement) was the individual entry. "I see TRump dropped another load of Xcrement in the Xitter last night."
Change approved.

It's better than trying to determine if he's composed a right or left side Twix, not to mention the confusion created when someone claims he dropped a deuce. The less I have to think about him, the happier I am.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:52 am
by Slim Cognito
:biggrin:

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:17 pm
by noblepa
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm
much ado wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:56 pm Should we have a separate thread for Trump Truths and X-crements?
Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
You forgot the Hanoi Hilton.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:22 pm
by bill_g
Or Paris Hilton for that matter.

What were we talking about?

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:25 pm
by noblepa
bill_g wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:22 pm Or Paris Hilton for that matter.

What were we talking about?
Gregg mentioned the Bastille or the Dry Tortugas (infamous former prisons) as possible places for T****'s incarceration.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:43 pm
by bill_g
noblepa wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:25 pm
bill_g wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:22 pm Or Paris Hilton for that matter.

What were we talking about?
Gregg mentioned the Bastille or the Dry Tortugas (infamous former prisons) as possible places for T****'s incarceration.
Then I'll stay with my answer. She's insufferable.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:29 pm
by Gregg
noblepa wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:17 pm
Gregg wrote: Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:00 pm
pipistrelle wrote: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:16 pm

Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.
Well, priosn might have fixed it for me if The Bastille or Dry Tortuga were still options. Now I'm not so sure.
You forgot the Hanoi Hilton.

Too many amenities.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v. Donald Trump, Defendant - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 12:39 pm
by Maybenaut
noblepa wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 12:17 pm
You forgot the Hanoi Hilton.
The irony. I like one-time Presidents who did not get convicted.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:43 pm
by Volkonski
Trump’s comments risk tainting a jury in federal election subversion case, special counsel says

https://apnews.com/article/trump-justic ... 27f1023358
Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith warned Tuesday that former President Donald Trump’s “daily” statements risk tainting a jury pool in Washington in the criminal case charging him with scheming to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump’s provocative comments about both Smith’s team and U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan — who is presiding over the case — have been a central issue since the indictment was filed last month. Prosecutors have repeatedly signaled their concerns about the impact of Trump’s social media posts and Chutkan explicitly warned Trump against inflammatory remarks that could intimidate witnesses or contaminate potential jurors.

The posts continued Tuesday both before and after the latest concern flared, with Trump earlier in the day circulating a New York Post story about Chutkan on his Truth Social platform and openly mocking the idea that she could be fair in his case. Later in the evening, he issued another post in which he attacked Smith as a “deranged” prosecutor with “unchecked and insane aggression.”

The latest complaint from the Justice Department underscores the extent to which Trump’s social media attacks are testing the patience of prosecutors and also risk exposing him to sanctions from the judge, who last week set a trial date of March 4, 2024 in an effort to keep the case moving. Trump has faced warnings in other cases, too, with a condition of his release in a separate prosecution in Atlanta being that he refrain from intimidating co-defendants, witnesses or victims in the case.

INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:58 pm
by Gregg
Can you say "Pre Trial Detention"?

I knew that you could....

Image