Fogbow

Posted: **Tue Jul 11, 2023 8:27 pm**

bob wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2023 3:06 pm Loy, predictably, filed a rehearing petition.

It is even more of an angry screed than their usual rants.

Because this is just a PFR, SCOTUS can deny it at any time; no need to wait for the fall's long conference.

Looking at their usual process for rehearings that miss the last conference, it appears Brunson probably missed the distribution for the 31 July rehearing denial list, so it will probably be on the 21 August list of denials.

When I mean list, I mean the day the order list is posted.

Posted: **Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:33 pm**

Hey you all are being so cavalier about this, Brunson may have us EXACTLY where he wants us!

Reeeealist, bullets began to sweating, should we panic?

I mean, there's scripture here.

: Isiah Brunson.JPG (108.78 KiB) Viewed 1076 times

Posted: **Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:05 pm**

Raland (on Facebook) wrote:* LOY BRUNSON *

Yesterday Loy's 2nd Petition for a hearing was accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court and put on the docket (their schedule). They will soon set a new conference date for reconsideration. We have worked hard on this petition and once again are counting on your prayers! If our brother Loy gets a hearing it will only mean that your prayers and support made the difference. I believe in miracles and I believe that many of them come from prayer.

* RALAND J BRUNSON *

As of yesterday the court has received 9,719 letters from people all over this country telling them to allow this case to be heard!! Thank you so much for your love and support!

First of all there are two judges on my case. The magistrate judge (Jared C. Bennett) who offers a preliminary judgment, and Judge Howard C. Nielson, who makes the final decision. The magistrate judge Bennett has now handed the final decision of this case to Judge Howard C. Nielson. All letters from here on out will be sent to Judge Nielson for the final decision. If you are not sure about sending a letter to the Judge, wondering if it’s even worth it and you feel like all judges in this country are corrupt, making you feel down, sad, and discouraged, and you find yourself gazing at a blurred reflection of yourself in that dark sea of abyss, then I have a suggestion for you. Click Here www.enoughisenough.me and send that letter! Thank you and God bless every one of you.

That's a long-winded way to "update" on their respective fails.

Posted: **Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:39 pm**

Maybe Loy will decide he can sue the court when he sees there is no date for a conference but just an entry:

DISTRIBUTED

It would then be followed by Rehearing DENIED in a later entry (31 July, 21 August, or 8 September).

That is the normal for summer rehearing dumps. I have not looked, but I assume if there were actually a rehearing that was worthy of consideration, it would be moved to the Long Conference for actual consideration.

Posted: **Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:42 pm**

bob wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:05 pm
Raland (on Facebook) wrote:* LOY BRUNSON *
First of all there are two judges on my case. The magistrate judge (Jared C. Bennett) who offers a preliminary judgment, and Judge Howard C. Nielson, who makes the final decision. The magistrate judge Bennett has now handed the final decision of this case to Judge Howard C. Nielson. All letters from here on out will be sent to Judge Nielson for the final decision. If you are not sure about sending a letter to the Judge,
That's a long-winded way to "update" on their respective fails.

Has Raland not realized that now is the time to file any objection to the recommendations? That would be far more useful than having his followers send the letters to a judge who will not consider them.

Posted: **Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:52 pm**

I guess Loy thinks the 10th circuit case is on hold since he went to SCOTUS, or he just decided to skip it:

Oh looky, 10th circuit stuff shows up on CourtListener
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67 ... n-v-adams/

04/24/2023 Open Document
3 pg, 371.49 KB [10994191] Three service copies of Rule 11 Petition for Writ of Certiorari received from Loy Arlan Brunson but not filed. (Hard copy only.) Served on 04/19/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4042] [Entered: 04/25/2023 12:33 PM]
04/25/2023 Open Document

1 pg, 55.68 KB [10994212] Petition for writ of certiorari filed by Loy Arlan Brunson on 04/19/2023. Supreme Court Number 22-1028. [23-4042] [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:12 PM]
05/09/2023 Open Document
2 pg, 26.39 KB [10997999] Jurisdictional review complete. Notice of appearance, fee or IFP forms and appellant's opening brief due on 06/20/2023 for Loy Arlan Brunson. Record on appeal due for 10th circuit 05/30/2023. [23-4042] [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:51 PM]
05/10/2023 Open Document
760 pg, 56.5 MB [10998078] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Volumes I & II - Pleadings. [23-4042] [Entered: 05/10/2023 08:52 AM]
06/26/2023 Open Document

1 pg, 65.29 KB [11008691] Supreme Court order dated 06/26/2023 denying certiorari filed by Loy Arlan Brunson. [23-4042] [Entered: 06/26/2023 03:31 PM]
06/27/2023 Open Document

1 pg, 78.33 KB [11008935] Deficiency notice issued. Notice of appearance, appellant's brief and fee or ifp forms now due by 07/05/2023 for Loy Arlan Brunson. [23-4042] [Entered: 06/27/2023 11:58 AM]
07/10/2023 Open Document
1 pg, 197.82 KB [11012282] Three service copies of Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing captioned for the US Supreme Court received from Loy Arlan Brunson but not filed. (Hard copy only.) Served on 07/07/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4042] [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:02 PM]

Posted: **Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:56 pm**

northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:42 pm
bob wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:05 pm
Raland (on Facebook) wrote:* LOY BRUNSON *
First of all there are two judges on my case. The magistrate judge (Jared C. Bennett) who offers a preliminary judgment, and Judge Howard C. Nielson, who makes the final decision. The magistrate judge Bennett has now handed the final decision of this case to Judge Howard C. Nielson. All letters from here on out will be sent to Judge Nielson for the final decision. If you are not sure about sending a letter to the Judge,
That's a long-winded way to "update" on their respective fails.
Has Raland not realized that now is the time to file any objection to the recommendations? That would be far more useful than having his followers send the letters to a judge who will not consider them.

I think the answer is no. He has yet to file an objection to the recommendations; depending on when they were served on him, it would be 14 days (and he apparently was aware of the recommendations given his post). I a pretty sure when have hit 14 days by now.

Posted: **Thu Jul 27, 2023 2:00 pm**

northland10 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:52 pm I guess Loy thinks the 10th circuit case is on hold since he went to SCOTUS, or he just decided to skip it:

Oh looky, 10th circuit stuff shows up on CourtListener
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67 ... n-v-adams/
04/24/2023 Open Document 3 pg, 371.49 KB [10994191] Three service copies of Rule 11 Petition for Writ of Certiorari received from Loy Arlan Brunson but not filed. (Hard copy only.) Served on 04/19/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4042] [Entered: 04/25/2023 12:33 PM]

04/25/2023 Open Document 1 pg, 55.68 KB [10994212] Petition for writ of certiorari filed by Loy Arlan Brunson on 04/19/2023. Supreme Court Number 22-1028. [23-4042] [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:12 PM]

05/09/2023 Open Document 2 pg, 26.39 KB [10997999] Jurisdictional review complete. Notice of appearance, fee or IFP forms and appellant's opening brief due on 06/20/2023 for Loy Arlan Brunson. Record on appeal due for 10th circuit 05/30/2023. [23-4042] [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:51 PM]

05/10/2023 Open Document 760 pg, 56.5 MB [10998078] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2, Comments: Volumes I & II - Pleadings. [23-4042] [Entered: 05/10/2023 08:52 AM]

06/26/2023 Open Document 1 pg, 65.29 KB [11008691] Supreme Court order dated 06/26/2023 denying certiorari filed by Loy Arlan Brunson. [23-4042] [Entered: 06/26/2023 03:31 PM]

06/27/2023 Open Document 1 pg, 78.33 KB [11008935] Deficiency notice issued. Notice of appearance, appellant's brief and fee or ifp forms now due by 07/05/2023 for Loy Arlan Brunson. [23-4042] [Entered: 06/27/2023 11:58 AM]

07/10/2023 Open Document 1 pg, 197.82 KB [11012282] Three service copies of Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing captioned for the US Supreme Court received from Loy Arlan Brunson but not filed. (Hard copy only.) Served on 07/07/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4042] [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:02 PM]

If so, he's not thinking. He case be done.

This appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Tenth Circuit Rules 3.3(B) and 42.1. A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court

Here's the docket.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67 ... n-v-adams/

Posted: **Thu Jul 27, 2023 6:35 pm**

More bad news for Loy: SCOTUS distributed his rehearing petition.

Denial published on Monday?

Posted: **Thu Jul 27, 2023 6:58 pm**

bob wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 6:35 pm More bad news for Loy: SCOTUS distributed his rehearing petition.

Denial published on Monday?

My guess is it will be published on the August 21 list. That is consistent with rehearing petitions that are distributed in the last week of July. Those distributed in the first week of July end up on the July 31-August 1-August 2 published order list.

Generally, the ones distributed in the first week of July were submitted earlier, though not entirely. I assume there are various reasons why one takes longer to be distributed.

Posted: **Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:25 am**

Opening this topic still puts me on pins and needles. I break out into a sweat and can't stop shaking.

Because any day now, The Brunsons are going to WIN and you know their first task will be sending Obots to FEMA trailer parks for "re-education". Maybe if we start sending thousands of letters The Brunsons will give us some amnesty or at least reduce our time in hard labor.

Have tried to put my affairs in order, and of course review the most recent Soros Emergency Handbook.

Adding to my stress, Realist hasn't been over to talk me off the ledge.

We all can see their recent documents were BRILLIANT. Maybe SCOTUS will cancel their recess, scoot back to DC and take the Brunson cases up and set them for arguments the same day. And who knows, maybe SCOTUS will bring The Brunsons onboard to work as clerks... or if there's a vacancy........

In other words: THIS MAY BE IT! FOR SURE THIS TIME!

Posted: **Fri Jul 28, 2023 9:25 am**

orlylicious wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:26 am Opening this topic still puts me on pins and needles. I break out into a sweat and can't stop shaking.

We all can see their recent documents were BRILLIANT.

I particularly liked how the most recent petition for rehearing laid such a clever trap for the justices, using that favorite SovCit fantasy that anything that's not actively rebutted is therefore affirmed as true.

So the whole thing is basically, "if you deny our petition, you are flushing America down the toilet and you are all a bunch of cotton-headed ninny muggins."

Yeah, that will motivate them to take the case toot sweet.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:39 pm**

Grifter gotta.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:55 pm**

What is the angle here? "Send us $20 and we will send a letter/Fax/impure thought in your name to the Supreme court!"?

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 2:10 pm**

bob wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:39 pm
Grifter gotta.

First Rule 11 docketed since the 70s? As of a year ago, there were 14 cases granted cert before judgment since February 2019, not just docketed.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 2:47 pm**

Suranis wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:55 pm What is the angle here? "Send us $20 and we will send a letter/Fax/impure thought in your name to the Supreme court!"?

Basically yes.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 3:55 pm**

That fact that they're still running a grift off of this shows me that there are A LOT of citizens out there that failed basic civics in high school....

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 6:45 pm**

According to the docket, for that case number the only thing docketed is the petition for rehearing, which will obviousy be denied. Am I missing something?

Search documents in this case:
No. 22-1028
Title: Loy Arlan Brunson, Petitioner
v.
Alma S. Adams, et al.
Docketed: April 24, 2023
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Case Numbers: (23-4042)

Date Proceedings and Orders
Apr 19 2023 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2023)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

May 08 2023 Amicus brief of Paul Preston and New California State not accepted for filing.(Corrected version to be submitted) (May 24, 2023)

May 11 2023 Brief amicus curiae of Paul Preston, et al. (June 5, 2023) filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count

May 24 2023 Waiver of right of respondent Alma S. Adams, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document

Jun 06 2023 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.

Jun 26 2023 Petition DENIED.

Jul 07 2023 Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document

Jul 27 2023 DISTRIBUTED.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.asp ... -1028.html

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 6:51 pm**

realist wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 6:45 pm According to the docket, for that case number the only thing docketed is the petition for rehearing, which will obviousy be denied. Am I missing something?

That the Brunson Grifters are lying again.

Yes: Your read is correct; the only thing pending in SCOTUS is Loy's rehearing petition.

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:05 pm**

Frater I*I wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 3:55 pm That fact that they're still running a grift off of this shows me that there are A LOT of citizens out there that filed basic civics in high school....

What does 'basic civics' look like in a RWNJ home schooling situation?

Posted: **Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:23 pm**

But but but Realist, it says

Jul 27 2023 DISTRIBUTED.

Are you sure we don't need to keep PANICKING??? It seems so serious and well written and they've had almost 300 letters! And the Brunson supporters on Twitter are SO SURE it's going to happen, they say it will be right around the time JFK Jr comes back to be T****'s surprise VP partner for 2024!

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 2:57 pm**

orlylicious wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:23 pm But but but Realist, it says

Jul 27 2023 DISTRIBUTED.

Are you sure we don't need to keep PANICKING??? It seems so serious and well written and they've had almost 300 letters! And the Brunson supporters on Twitter are SO SURE it's going to happen, they say it will be right around the time JFK Jr comes back to be T****'s surprise VP partner for 2024!

I think we're good.

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 3:08 pm**

Any bets on whether Loy will file the rarely used but clever Second Petition for Rehearing after this one is denied?

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 3:15 pm**

Reality Check wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 3:08 pm Any bets on whether Loy will file the rarely used but clever Second Petition for Rehearing after this one is denied?

Raland did exactly that.

But the Brunson Grifters have learned their marks get all excited by name-checking SCOTUS. Because their intent is to grift, not win (or even be perceived as serious), there's no downside for them: OPM will be paying for any failed paper throwing.

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm**

Oh. I missed that the first rehearings denied order list came out on 24 July. It was a week earlier though maybe it is bases on when the last conference was and I did not check that timing.

This may mean that Loy's will be on the next one, maybe on the 14th and maybe the 21st.

Fogbow

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case