Fogbow

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:29 pm

AndyinPA wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:31 pm Is anybody else just sick to death of all this?

I was sick to death of it in 2016.

I believe it is not compulsory for anyone to read threads that do not interest them.

I for one am happy to read summaries, commentary, analysis and snark here.

Sam the Centipede wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:42 pm I believe it is not compulsory for anyone to read threads that do not interest them.

I for one am happy to read summaries, commentary, analysis and snark here.

That's not what we're saying.

Should we have a separate thread for Trump Truths and X-crements?

much ado wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:56 pm Should we have a separate thread for Trump Truths and X-crements?

Again, that’s not what we’re saying (or at least me). I’ve been sick of him since 2016. Prison might fix it.

neonzx wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:50 pm

AndyinPA wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:31 pm Is anybody else just sick to death of all this?

Way past expiration. So waiting until all of these threads can be combined into one "Inmate #xxxx"

Whatever that 'xxxx' number is, it will become the most famous inmate number since '24601' and likely even surpass it.

Foggy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:39 pm

Off Topic

I honestly oughta put bob on salary for the outstanding amount of legal analysis he generates. And what he says, you can rely upon.

But hay, I'm a volunteer too also. I just wanted to say, you rock, bob.

Truth!

Foggy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:39 pm

Off Topic

I honestly oughta put bob on salary for the outstanding amount of legal analysis he generates. And what he says, you can rely upon.

But hay, I'm a volunteer too also. I just wanted to say, you rock, bob.

Invaluable.

My thought would be if any of the defendants get removed or severed, we start a separate thread for them.

If they all end up tried together, perhaps a new thread for the trial.

Just spitballing here.

IS THIS THING ON?

One more time: I didn't say I'm sick of anyone posting or reposting anything, including "Truths" (aka falsehoods).

I'm sick of the person behind them.

THAT IS ALL.

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:02 pm IS THIS THING ON?

One more time: I didn't say I'm sick of anyone posting or reposting anything, including "Truths" (aka falsehoods).

I'm sick of the person behind them.

THAT IS ALL.

I never understood anything different from your post.

Greg's tweet was cut off earlier. Here's the full tweet:

Greg Walters @thegregwalters 14h
"We will not be able to provide adequate representation" by that trial date, Lauro says. "I feel I need to put that on the record.... That trial date is inconsistent with Mr Trump's right of due process."

Chutkan: "I understand and your objection is noted for the record."

Chutkan: "Now here, drink your chocolate milk like a good boy. Who's my good boy?"

And Bob is a King. Thank God we didn't lose him to Rondeau when she tried to poach him with promises of daily Grand Slam Breakfasts. Getting to spend time in the big operation with the printing presses, the fact checking department, the interview bookers, the cushy expense account travel and the red carpet treatment from any possible interviewee must have been tempting as hell. Along with the big salary plus benefits package. We dodged a bullet but that was too close for comfort.


Here's a thread reader app unroll of all of Greg's coverage of the hearing: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1696 ... 24438.html

Foggy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:39 pm

Off Topic

I honestly oughta put bob on salary for the outstanding amount of legal analysis he generates. And what he says, you can rely upon.

But hay, I'm a volunteer too also. I just wanted to say, you rock, bob.

Even when he tells me I'm wrong, which is early and often.

This is a Galaxy Bar. I didn't know they had an association.

Hadn't read the dopey filing asking for the trial in 2026. It's at https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 0.0_10.pdf and of course it was DENNIED.

Instead of doing something productive, these idiots make charts showing how big 11.5 million pages are. I mean, I guess it's good to know that, "Stated differently, if we were to print and stack 11.5 million pages of documents, with no gap between pages, at 200 pages per inch, the result would be a tower of paper stretching nearly 5,000 feet into the sky. That is taller than the Washington Monument, stacked on top of itself eight times, with nearly a million pages to spare". Wonder if Judge Chutkin was wildly impressed.




Still making some revisions on topic titles and the Protopage, it's hard to keep all four indicates straight. Adding Judges names to the topic titles. On Protopage, made an orange tab at the top for "Trump Indictments" with the dockets. Unfortunately, for the Fulton County case, you have to register with lots of info including phone number to access it. I put links to the register page and to the docket when logged in. I've joined it so can add things as needed here. I still can't find the docket on Indicated #1, the NY vs Trump hush money case -- I can find the appeal but not a docket on the case. If anybody can find it please let me know and I'll add it. The Protopage seems to be working well, it's handy to have everything in one place. Thanks again Foggy for adding it. https://protopage.com/birthers#Home

They sound as if search engines and AI were a thing of the future and they only have the Pony Express as communication means

Isn’t that another way to say overwhelming amount of evidence?

About the thread title: name is Chutkan, not Chutkin.

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 5:32 pm Isn’t that another way to say overwhelming amount of evidence?

I got 99 problems, and evidence ain't one.