Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
http://thefogbow.com/forum/
As always, "it depends."Uninformed wrote: ↑Sat Aug 14, 2021 6:11 am If the case goes to trial and Squidney is still represented by Kleinhandler claiming that her statements were “statements were accurate” can he be sanctioned for previously claiming no reasonable person would believe her?
The Squid has been saying nothing about her lawsuits, nothing about Dominion, no comment on Judge Nichol's denial of the MTD... all she's doing on Telegram is forwarding stories about the COVID vaccine and other nonsense. Although The Squid did pass along the burning issue of... Florida voting. 
Sidney Powell
, [12.08.21 23:25]
[Forwarded from Caroline]
During a recent canvas of Florida's 14 largest counties, it was discovered that over 700,000 people were on voter rolls who did not vote in the past eight years and 61% of canvassed voters no longer lived at their current registration address.
Why is Florida's Secretary of State, Laurel Lee, opposed to an audit?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/0 ... may-worse/
And based on Twitter comments, it was as successful as the Cyber Symposium.
#WalkOutWednesday NOON TODAY.
WALK OUT OF work, stores, wherever you are, turn off your TV, to protest the mandates!! WalkOutWednesday.net
Gene Dimitrieff @EugeneDimitrief Aug 11
#WalkOutWednesday failed
@ConeyIslandHosp. The reason is unknown. Probably it is because people didn’t know anything about it as, most probably, main media didn’t cover this event. Wonder if anyone knew about #WalkOutWednesday in #NYC. To keep voices silent, lack of info is key
Billy BARTY.Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Aug 14, 2021 8:58 am Billy Barry is the little person in the video. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Barty
He founded the Little People of America organization in 1957.
Mackenzie Alan Bettle @realmackenzieB 11h
Today, one of my best friends has to dress up in full drag and sit in a corkys for 24 hours bc he came in last place in our .@NFL fantasy league.
Every pancake he eats is one hour off the time line.
IANAL, but I don’t think it could possibly work that way, else much legal defense would focus on running out the clock.somerset wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 3:56 pm Delaying the inevitable, but....
I thought the statute of limitations on defamation is pretty short. Is it possible for Squidney, Roodles, et. al., to "run out the clock" by never being ready for trial, then have the suit dismissed once the statute of limitations times out?
I think the statute of limitations refers to when the case is actually filed, not when it's settled.somerset wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 3:56 pm Delaying the inevitable, but....
I thought the statute of limitations on defamation is pretty short. Is it possible for Squidney, Roodles, et. al., to "run out the clock" by never being ready for trial, then have the suit dismissed once the statute of limitations times out?
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure that the Statute of Limitations sets a time limit on when the lawsuit can be filed, not that the suit must be completed in that time.somerset wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 3:56 pm Delaying the inevitable, but....
I thought the statute of limitations on defamation is pretty short. Is it possible for Squidney, Roodles, et. al., to "run out the clock" by never being ready for trial, then have the suit dismissed once the statute of limitations times out?
I know I was involved in a civil suit (breach of contract) that "timed out" before going to trial, and was ultimately dismissed by the court at the five year point. It never went to trial because our opponent's attorneys weren't willing to try the case until he adequately funded his client account. The trial date kept getting pushed back while he tried to convince his attorneys they should be confident in their ability to win the case and collect their fees from our side instead of getting paid upfront by him. The senior partners in the law firm didn't quite agree with that strategy, and ultimately the judge threw out the case after we BK'd the company and the judge refused to admit a new party at the 11th hour.noblepa wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 4:12 pmIANAL, but I'm pretty sure that the Statute of Limitations sets a time limit on when the lawsuit can be filed, not that the suit must be completed in that time.somerset wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 3:56 pm Delaying the inevitable, but....
I thought the statute of limitations on defamation is pretty short. Is it possible for Squidney, Roodles, et. al., to "run out the clock" by never being ready for trial, then have the suit dismissed once the statute of limitations times out?
Otherwise, you would have a situation in which a judge might say "I was going to rule in favor of the plaintiff and award him a bazillion dollars in damages, but, sorry, time's up". I don't think that is how it works.
That sounds more like failure to prosecute, a KKKlayman specialty.somerset wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:36 pm
I know I was involved in a civil suit (breach of contract) that "timed out" before going to trial, and was ultimately dismissed by the court at the five year point. It never went to trial because our opponent's attorneys weren't willing to try the case until he adequately funded his client account. The trial date kept getting pushed back while he tried to convince his attorneys they should be confident in their ability to win the case and collect their fees from our side instead of getting paid upfront by him. The senior partners in the law firm didn't quite agree with that strategy, and ultimately the judge threw out the case after we BK'd the company and the judge refused to admit a new party at the 11th hour.
So I know it's possible, I just don't know if those circumstances apply in this case.
You are correct some jurisdictions do have limits on how long a case may linger on a court's docket. But many do not have such limits.
Linda put the beat down on the Krakens.
This lawsuit represents a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process.
It is one thing to take on the charge of vindicating rights associated with an
allegedly fraudulent election. It is another to take on the charge of deceiving a
federal court and the American people into believing that rights were infringed,
without regard to whether any laws or rights were in fact violated. This is what
happened here.
Preparing to dive in right now!Maybenaut wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 6:04 pm The sanction order is out.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 72.0_3.pdf
Ninja’d by Dan!
Sidney Powell 
, [12.08.21 23:25]
