Fogbow

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:17 am**

I wonder if she supported pilots not being licensed, nor aircraft registered, insured or even air worthy.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:58 am**

I heard a lot of Gish Galloping going on in the minute part that I listened to. I hate Gish Galloping.

I understand the concept that there are commercial vehicle definitions, and restrictions or licensing or whatever aimed at commercial vehicles don't apply to non-commercial vehicles. I CANNOT understand the why Sovcit Nutz cannot understand (or refuse to acknowledge) that commercial vehicles are licensed under one set of rules, non-commercial vehicles are licensed under a different set of rules.

And don't fkn tell me that Admiralty Law applies a private automobile or something.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:34 am**

I am still waiting for the sovcits to build their own roads to drive travel on.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:23 am**

RTH10260 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:34 am I am still waiting for the sovcits to build their own roads to drive travel on.

Don't give them any ideas. With their respect for the rights and safety of others, they'll start pouring concrete on the property of random people, and they'll do a crappy job of it, ending up with a road that won't support the weight of whatever they drive on it. Think: Trump's wall except even shoddier quality.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:26 am**

keith wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:58 am I CANNOT understand the why Sovcit Nutz cannot understand (or refuse to acknowledge) that commercial vehicles are licensed under one set of rules, non-commercial vehicles are licensed under a different set of rules.

They are intellectually dishonest. They can understand, many of them probably do, but it doesn't matter. The narrative is all they care about, and thus will add or remove facts as they fit. They are not interested in being accurate, only in telling their story in a way that makes them feel validated.

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:29 am**

I wonder how sovcit road planners would crack the nut of a property owner refusing to allow them a ROW? Just how zig-zaggy would their super-slab be if they applied the respect for personal freedoms they claim to honor?

Posted: **Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:58 pm**

keith wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:58 am I understand the concept that there are commercial vehicle definitions, and restrictions or licensing or whatever aimed at commercial vehicles don't apply to non-commercial vehicles. I CANNOT understand the why Sovcit Nutz cannot understand (or refuse to acknowledge) that commercial vehicles are licensed under one set of rules, non-commercial vehicles are licensed under a different set of rules.

Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke wrote: This category of litigant shares one other critical characteristic: they will only honour state, regulatory, contract, family, fiduciary, equitable, and criminal obligations if they feel like it. And typically, they don’t.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:03 am**

bill_g wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:29 am I wonder how sovcit road planners would crack the nut of a property owner refusing to allow them a ROW? Just how zig-zaggy would their super-slab be if they applied the respect for personal freedoms they claim to honor?

Private roads where everyone contributes out of the goodness of their hearts or charges a toll?
Or more likely, everyone would be able to set a price for their land that the local government would have to pay, and in their fantasy world the government has unlimited funds that do not involve taxing anything, so all the land owners get rich! Which at least part of that is from the era they idealize. In my home area we have a bunch of really zig-zaggy roads because at the time the planners made sure the road touched on all the properties their friends owned so they could sell it at inflated prices.

Posted: **Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:20 pm**

neeneko wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:03 am
bill_g wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:29 am I wonder how sovcit road planners would crack the nut of a property owner refusing to allow them a ROW? Just how zig-zaggy would their super-slab be if they applied the respect for personal freedoms they claim to honor?
Private roads where everyone contributes out of the goodness of their hearts or charges a toll?
Or more likely, everyone would be able to set a price for their land that the local government would have to pay, and in their fantasy world the government has unlimited funds that do not involve taxing anything, so all the land owners get rich! Which at least part of that is from the era they idealize. In my home area we have a bunch of really zig-zaggy roads because at the time the planners made sure the road touched on all the properties their friends owned so they could sell it at inflated prices.

I’m sure that they can just use the $4 million dollars from their Cestui Que Vie to build their roads and live off the balance since it’s illegal to pay a bill

https://societyandnature.org/cqv.pdf For extra derp

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:07 am**

The Rise of the Moops are on the offensive. Suing various parties from the judge to the state troopers in federal court. I am sure this will go far.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60 ... te-police/

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:33 am**

BigSkip wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:07 am The Rise of the Moops are on the offensive. Suing various parties from the judge to the state troopers in federal court. I am sure this will go far.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60 ... te-police/

They wish the tax payer pay for their sh*t "Proceed In Forma Pauperis"

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:13 am**

All of the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis*. I think this will be fun to follow and will start a new thread.

*https://legaldictionary.thefreedictiona ... a+Pauperis

In Forma Pauperis

[Latin, In the character or manner of a pauper.] A phrase that indicates the permission given by a court to an indigent to initiate a legal action without having to pay for court fees or costs due to his or her lack of financial resources.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:38 pm**

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:13 am All of the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis*. I think this will be fun to follow and will start a new thread.

*https://legaldictionary.thefreedictiona ... a+Pauperis

In Forma Pauperis

[Latin, In the character or manner of a pauper.] A phrase that indicates the permission given by a court to an indigent to initiate a legal action without having to pay for court fees or costs due to his or her lack of financial resources.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

I must object: The only source for all law (excepting the original Magna Carta, the UCC and whatever I pull out of my rear end), is Black's Law Dictionary, 9th Edition IIRC.

Posted: **Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:55 pm**

We don't want no fancy latin stuff messin up our Sui Juris Common Law stuff.

Posted: **Sat Jul 31, 2021 10:43 am**

woodworker:
I must object: The only source for all law (excepting the original Magna Carta, the UCC and whatever I pull out of my rear end), is Black's Law Dictionary, 9th Edition IIRC.

First year law school's most needed and used law book! How could I forget?????!!!!!!!!

It's a good thing I retired.

https://thelawdictionary.org/in-forma-pauperis/

What is IN FORMA PAUPERIS?
In the character or manner of a pauper. Describes permission given to a poor person to sue without liability for costs.

I applaud Gregg's irony about no Latin phrases in our sui juris sovcit common law!

Posted: **Sat Jul 31, 2021 11:21 am**

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 10:43 am
I applaud Gregg's irony about no Latin phrases in our sui juris sovcit common law!

Pffffftttt...everyone knows that latin is the language of the Papacy and therefore the Holy See, whose law controls all the courts of the corporate US government...

[Sorry, I just read some more of Ed Brown's warraggable this morning...

]

Posted: **Sun Aug 01, 2021 12:13 pm**

To quickly paraphrase a point from the other thread so it's not left dangling here: If someone files a frivolous suit against you in federal court and asks for IFP status to do it, that's a huge stroke of luck for you. The IFP application means that the case immediately goes to a judge for screening, and that judge can and often will dismiss that case in a matter of a few days, without you having to lift a finger.

Posted: **Thu Aug 05, 2021 3:39 am**

Remember Paul-Kenneth: of the House of Cromar? He is now a "judicial coroner". Filed some stupid shit that is 93 pages long. I only read a couple of pages. H/T @ken_cromar (parody account of course).
http://www.miraclesingodwetrust.com/wp- ... a-USPS.pdf

: Capture.JPG (82.45 KiB) Viewed 1670 times

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 11:29 am**

Got this letter today. It's short and sweet. Thought you'd enjoy it.

John Darash has sent you a group email from National Liberty Alliance.

Dear NLA Member

As of Aug 8th 19 Government by Consent books by 10 people out of 10,000 members bought a book for their Sheriff!

“If Virtue & Knowledge are dispersed among the People, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great Security.” - Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779

Buy your Sheriff a book at https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org ... ent-book-0

Buy yourself a book at https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/book-order

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 11:36 am**

"Buy yourself a book"

Do those email recipients actually know what a "book" is

Can they actually read something that is longer than a flyer page

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 11:39 am**

For "only" $50....

Posted: **Tue Aug 10, 2021 1:59 am**

Billie seims to have moved on from her don't have to pay my mortgage shit. Remember when she was reselling ATW's shit? She is as nutty as they get. If you go to her links do NOT click on them. They are stinky.

: Capture.JPG (104.8 KiB) Viewed 1441 times

Posted: **Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:28 am**

So a lady from California thinks she can intervene in a case in Michigan (standing or something) and demand a county on the other side of the country from her do a "forensic audit?"

Posted: **Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:36 am**

Welqome to Camilot.

Posted: **Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:41 am**

Pardon my ignorance, but can anyone explain what would a 'forensic audit' as differentiated from a recount (total / hand) in the eyes of a sentient human being as opposed to one of these wackadoodles, consist of?

Fogbow

Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz

Re: Sovcit nutz