Page 13 of 25
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:26 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:21 pm
bob wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 11:31 am
northland10 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:52 pm
If the clerks put it on tomorrow's distribution, it would go on the 22 June conference. If not, summer list.
Made it onto the
June 22 conference.
Denial to be published June 26.
And the petition for rehearing will be denied on their mid-summer rehearing dump, unless Brunson is slow to file the petition.
What about second petition for rehearing?
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:49 pm
by northland10
W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:26 pm
northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:21 pm
And the petition for rehearing will be denied on their mid-summer rehearing dump, unless Brunson is slow to file the petition.
What about second petition for rehearing?
We won't know about it because it won't be docketed. The only way we will here about it is in their fundraising pitch, like they did for Raland. You get one petition for rehearing (which is highly disfavored so likely to be dumped). After that, the shipping clerk says. nope.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:54 pm
by bob
northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:49 pmWe won't know about it because it won't be docketed. The only way we will here about it is in their fundraising pitch, like they did for Raland. You get one petition for rehearing (which is highly disfavored so likely to be dumped). After that, the shipping clerk says. nope.
Yep.
This will all be followed by the cert. petition from the 10th's affirmance of the district court's denial. And then the rehearing petition after that.
Meanwhile, Raland's second suit will have gone up the ladder, so ....
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:59 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
Sorry, that was a Lord of the Rings joke ("We've had one breakfast, yes, but what about second breakfast?"), not meant to be serious commentary.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 2:55 pm
by bob
W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:59 pm
Sorry, that was a Lord of the Rings joke ("We've had one breakfast, yes, but what about second breakfast?"), not meant to be serious commentary.
Ahhh.
But Raland did what you suggested; Poe's law and all that.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:27 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
And that was the tie-in to the joke.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 2:53 am
by keith
W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 1:59 pm
Sorry, that was a Lord of the Rings joke ("We've had one breakfast, yes, but what about second breakfast?"), not meant to be serious commentary.
My cat always insists on second breakfast.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:40 pm
by bob
Raland Brunson wrote:* Raland J Brunson's Case:
As of June 5, 2023 my Federal Court Judge has received 8,337 letters (thank you for your awesome support!!) from people all over the country telling him to allow Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson to explain, in my lawsuit against them, as to why it was so important that they supported enemies of the Constitution by voting against hearing my case against Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and over 300 members of congress by voting against investigating the allegations that there was interference with the 2020 Presidential Election. Any day now Judge Jared C. Bennett, will be making that decision. Will he honor his Oath of Office by allowing this case to go forward or will I be compelled to appeal it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals? We shall see.
* Loy Brunson's Case:
The Supreme Court has set a conference date (not a hearing date) but a date for them to discuss the case and vote if it is worthy for an official hearing. In order to have your case be heard by the US Supreme Court you have to get permission from them. You have to file what is called a "petition for writ of certiorari" where the Supremes will decide if they want to hear it or not. This conference date is set for June 22!!!
The soul purpose of my lawsuit against the 3 Supremes is to have either my case, or my brother Loy's case heard. We want a hearing!!!
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:52 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
You can't always get what you want
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2023 2:40 am
by Suranis
bob wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:40 pm
Raland Brunson wrote:... telling him to allow Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson to explain, in my lawsuit against them, as to why it was so important that they ...
Yep.
"Hey Judges, just letting you know that I ruled that you are allowed to explain this. Oh, you are not going to bother? That's cool!"
I love the little details buried in the word vomits that show they know that this is bullshit, but they are still legally covering their asses.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2023 7:59 pm
by northland10
In the case of Brunson v Sotomayor (removed to federal court), the Plaintiff respectfully requests the court to get off their butt and make a decision. There is grifting to be done and he needs some decision to push the grift. How dare a judge not follow the grifter schedule.
I may have paraphrased that a bit.
REQUEST TO SUBMIT FOR DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Plaintiff Raland J Brunson ("Brunson") hereby moves this court with His Request To Submit For Decision On Plaintiff's Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter-Jurisdiction and states:
This request is made pursuant to DUCivR 7-3
• Plaintiff served their said motion on or about April 19, 2023 (ECF 7).
• Brunson served his opposition on or about May 15, 2023 (ECF 14).
• Plaintiff filed their reply on or about May 30, 2023 (ECF 16).
• Brunson is not aware of any hearing that has been requested.
• This motion is fully briefed and is ready for a decision
Humbly submitted this the 12th day of June, 2023.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 17.0_1.pdf
Edit: fixed link to be to courtlistener, i.e. not Pacer.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:20 pm
by bob
Raland wrote:I want to thank CharLee Simons for another great interview and for promoting the letter campaign. So far my Federal Court Judge (Trump appointed judge) has received 9,320 letters! He will decide any day now if this case will move forward, or if I'll be appealing it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals!
Spoiler: You'll be appealing.
And, for the sadists, the
dumble Rumble interview (TL;D
RW).
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 8:03 pm
by Luke
Points for actually using "Any Day Now"!!
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 7:11 pm
by bob
There are a fair amount of tweets like this right now.
That SCOTUS is somehow magickally hearing the case today, and will issue its ruling tomorrow.
Sorry, Joe.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 11:59 am
by northland10
bob wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 7:11 pm
There are a fair amount of tweets like this right now.
That SCOTUS is somehow magickally hearing the case today, and will issue its ruling tomorrow.
Sorry, Joe.
Joined Twitter December 2021
MAGA Mom, Patriot and Anon who LOVES YAHUAH/GOD AND HER COUNTRY!!!
Organic Dairy farmers who Grows and raises most of our food. WWG1WGA!!!
A huge amount of posting in the last day, lots of Russia stuff. Yeah, Russian troll.
ETA: Yes, I realize there is a big thing in Russia right now but the tone was very much a troll not some general American observer. "Putin is talking to Trump..."
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:57 am
by bob
Sit down: Loy's petition was denied.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:06 am
by realist
bob wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:57 am
Sit down: Loy's petition was denied.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:21 am
by pipistrelle
bob wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:57 am
Sit down: Loy's petition was denied.
You shoulda spoilered that for those of us with weak hearts.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:37 am
by Foggy
There's no quit in them fellers. They'll figger sumpin' out.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:09 am
by bob
Foggy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:37 am
There's no quit in them fellers. They'll figger sumpin' out.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:46 am
by realist
Don't know if this has been posted, but here is a link to the attorney who sides with and advises these idiots.
https://www.joeygilbert.com/
He was also present at the January 6 insurrection.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:06 pm
by bob
realist wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:46 am
Don't know if this has been posted, but here is a link to the attorney who sides with and advises these idiots.
https://www.joeygilbert.com/
He was also present at the January 6 insurrection.
Orlylicious lurves to troll him.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 3:04 pm
by bob
This has been especially amusing:
Translated from Japanese by Google
The Supreme Court's Branson trial is over.
385 Democrats in Congress, Democratic Side of Judiciary, Other Tops
Convicted and found guilty
And the Brunson suckers earnestly believed that a rando Japanese account knew more than SCOTUS.
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 5:20 pm
by realist
#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:31 pm
by northland10
He keeps calling the Utah Federal Judge appointed by Trump as his judge. He filed the case in the state court. it is only with "his" judge because the defendants removed it to federal court.
The only question on the rehearing is whether they get it in early enough to be denied during the mid-summer rehearing dumping or of they will have to wait for the long conference.
You can't always get what you want
