Fogbow

OSET Institute 🇺🇳 🇺🇦 @OSET wrote: Presentation of EVN Awards.
Pacesetter Journalist Award goes to @Reuters @LindaSoReports for “Campaign of Fear” @JenFifield for her coverage of CyberNinjas audit.

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:38 am Whatever happened to jailing people for contempt?

Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:37 pm

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:38 am Whatever happened to jailing people for contempt?

tfg proved to a certain type of rebel that nothing will happen to you if you’re blatant enough about breaking/ignoring laws.

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 7:38 am Whatever happened to jailing people for contempt?

Maricopa County @maricopacounty wrote: It's 8 pm. The county election system is still not connected to the internet.
Alright, we're done now. Hopefully you get the point.

Trevor Nelson 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 @CTrevorNelson wrote: Where’s the 9pm check?

Shadegg report from “audit” finds no internet connection for ballot tabulation equipment

Maricopa County’s ballot tabulation system was never connected to the internet during the 2020 election and there were no routers to inspect, concluded a team of experts assembled by former Republican Congressman John Shadegg as part of the so-called “audit” of the last presidential election.

As part of the review the Senate President Karen Fann ordered into the baseless claims of fraud that former President Donald Trump and many of his supporters spread after he lost the election, she and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors agreed that Shadegg would serve as a special master who would hire IT three experts to examine the county’s routers and determine whether ballot tabulation machines were ever connected to the internet. There was never any evidence that the machines had been connected to the internet or otherwise hacked.

The county on Wednesday released the results of Shadegg’s investigation, which found no evidence of internet connectivity by the county’s Ballot Tabulation Center. Fann asked that Shadegg’s team examine routers and Splunk logs, which are records of events and tasks that occur in a network. Shadegg’s report said there were, in fact, no routers or splunk logs to examine.

Shadegg’s report said his team examined both the ballot tabulation equipment used in the 2020 election, which is currently in the possession of the Attorney General’s Office as part of its investigation into the results of Fann’s audit, and the equipment that was purchased to replace it.

Those machines, the report said, “were not, are not now, and are not ever connected by wire or wirelessly to any routers, computers, or electronic equipment outside the BTC.”

Furthermore, the report said that Shadegg found no evidence that data from the Ballot Tabulation Center had been deleted, purged, overwritten or destroyed, and that there was no evidence that anyone had tried to obstruct the “audit.”

Hidden Content

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.

https://www.azmirror.com/2022/03/23/sha ... equipment/

Senate President Karen Fann has now spent $500k to keep secrets about her election audit
Opinion: Senate President Karen Fann has spent $500,000 (of our money) to block us from seeing public records about the audit and the meter's still running. What is she hiding?

As we approach Month No. 10 in Senate President Karen Fann’s legal battle to keep secrets about Arizona’s election audit, it seems a good time for Arizona taxpayers to contemplate a question:

Just how much (of our) money is Fann willing to spend to prevent us from getting a look at the backroom maneuverings and outside manipulation that resulted in her election audit?

How much (of our) money is she willing to spend to prevent us from seeing public records detailing how she came to be auditing Maricopa County’s election and why she hired wholly unqualified, blatantly biased auditors to do the job?

The AZ - abc15 - Data Guru @Garrett_Archer wrote: I'm going through this now...but something is standing out. Big time.

There is nothing in here addressing anything actually done during the ballot review.

Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll wrote: 2020 Election Integrity: Arizona - Brnovich Has Bupkis

Counterfeit ballots, ballot trafficking ballrooms & trafficking mules, nope.

6 mths of total silence & then technical excuses on records production don't get you into the U.S. Senate.

Thank you for playing, Mark!

Stephen Richer—Maricopa Cnty Recorder (prsnl acct) @stephen_richer wrote: To include not a SINGLE THING about the many b.s. items in the Ninja report that AG investigators debunked … is really special.

Dillon Rosenblatt @DillonReedRose wrote: After his report yesterday that did not find evidence of widespread voter fraud, Brnovich goes onto Steve Bannon's podcast to say "we all know what happened in 2020" hinting at supporting the baseless claims the stop the stealers have pushed for months.

Tom Ryan @tomryanlaw wrote: Now that we have had the time to digest @GeneralBrnovich "Investigative" Report on Maricopa County and the 2020 General Election, it is an important time to address how a REAL attorney general would have handled this nonsense. 1/

A real attorney general (let's call him Mr. Gallant) would have looked at the idiotic letter he received from @FannKfann and have written back that he declined the investigation because he (Mr. Gallant) actually certified the election results. 2/

But let's assume for a moment that AG Gallant (you know the fake good one in this parable) actually saw a real reason to investigate. AG Gallant would've acknowledged he had a conflict of interest ("Hey I certified it, right?") & referred it out for investigation. But not Brno 3/

Sadly, @GeneralBrnovich is using our taxpayer money funding our Office of the Attorney General for kabuki litigation, phony investigations, and more all in the vain hopes that the MAGA base will love him and sweep him to victory in the Primary. 4/

Here's the real truth Brno: the MAGA base? They hate you. Unless you start abusing the power we have invested in you to arrest innocent public servants you will never, ever get their vote. Period. Your reputation is in tatters. Was this all worth it? I'm embarrassed for you. End