Taking Care of Maya - FL CPS/Munchausen case
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2024 2:09 pm
I caught up with more discussion of the evidence that did not make it into the Kowolksi vs Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital case. The more deeply I learn about evidence in this case the more I am stunned at the judge's decisions not just to suppress evidence, but in my opinion Jack K "opened the door" to some of this evidence when he testified untruthfully about his relationship with his wife, who, it turns out, he actually had served with divorce papers prior to her suicide. Yeah, that is a new thing I had not known. This was some of the suppressed evidence that I caught up on that was discussed on the Nobody Should Believe Me podcast. They have many of the audio recorded depositions, and the fact that Mr K had served divorce papers to Beata is contained in a recorded sworn deposition by Beata's brother. He is the one who found her body. She was still living in the house at the time, but they were no longer sleeping in the same room and since she was the one who was going to be moving out of the house Mr K was sleeping in the master bedroom, she was sleeping in Kyle's room, Kyle was sleeping on the couch, and Beata's brother had been making regular visits from Chicago down to Florida to be a source of support for his sister.
I joined the Patreon at the free level for the Nobody Should Believe me Podcast, and there are additional episodes available for members, even at the free level. Since I don't know how many of you have Patreon or are interested in going there, I will link to the web page for the podcast and there is an Episode called "What Jack Knew" that contains some of the new deposition material I had not known about from Beata's brother, Piotr. I am linking the latest three episodes from the web page, but I believe these are shortened versions of the episodes that I listened to on Patreon, so, if they don't contain some of the stuff I will mention below, it's probably because these are the "non member" version of the episodes". You can join her Patreon at the free level and get longer versions though.
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/what-jack-knew/
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/w ... -to-beata/
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/k ... n-shapiro/
Here is a synopsis of the main suppressed evidence that I learned from depositions in the case
1. According to Beata's brother's sworn deposition, one time when he visited his sister he was home all day with Jack and Kyle. Maya was in the hospital by this time. Kyle was playing with Piotr all day long, laughing, swimming, having a good time, absolutely nothing wrong with him. When Beata came home from work Kyle immediately ran to her crying that he was in "severe all over body pain" and he wanted to be taken "for treatment". I was fucking blown away when I heard this. This is exactly the same thing that Jack had told the detective about Maya - playing joyfully all day long and as soon as Beata came home she would cry and claim to be in severe pain. (All of this evidence was suppressed by the judge, the jury had no idea of this. In fact, the jury had no idea of any of the evidence that would have very easily resulted in a complete vindication of the hospital. IMO they had enough to seriously question things, but they would have had to really work through the evidence in a way that the defense was not allowed (by judge's order) to frame it during their closing argument.) I hope this is contained on the versions that I linked above. If not, please let me know and I will try to link the free Patreon version for you if you want to hear it for yourself. Piotr accompanied Beata when she took Kyle to some hospital two hours away for "pain treatment" but doctors could not identify any source of pain in Kyle and the notation on his discharge papers indicated that he did not have any of the normal signs of having pain, such as elevated pulse rate, elevated blood pressure, his demeanor did not match what is normally seen when a person is experiencing pain, and apparently they refused to give him pain medication that Beata was demanding.
2. I already mentioned this above -- Piotr said that Beata had told him over the phone that Jack had served her with divorce papers. He was in Chicago when she called to tell him about this. After they hung up he said he called Jack to ask him "why have you served my sister with divorce papers?" and he stated that Jack just hung up on him. He also said that even though he visited the family several times during that last month prior to Beata's suicide that Jack would not have any conversation with him and the night he showed up at the house (Beata was apparently already dead in the garage and nobody knew about it), that since Beata didn't answer her phone he dialed Jack's number over and over and over again to let him know he was on his way and Jack would not pick up.
The information about Jack actually serving Beata with divorce papers really bothers me given how much money the jury awarded Jack for what essentially amounts to his wife's companionship. There was one week of testimony that the plaintiff put on that dealt with all the money the jury should give this family. During Jack's testimony he whined about how now he rolls over in bed and tries to throw his arm over his wife and she is not there. He couldn't muster any tears over that, and now I understand why. I knew they were not sleeping in the same room for the last month or two of her life, but I had not known he had taken things all the way to actually serving her with the divorce papers.
I am curious as to why the defense was not allowed to put in the evidence about the divorce since Jack seems to have "opened the door" by this kind of testimony. Or maybe I don't fully understand the concept of "opening the door", or maybe it doesn't apply in a civil case? Either way it just stuns me the amount of lies that judge KNEW Jack was telling on the witness stand and his testimony stood for the jury to consider it as fact. This is just one of a multitude of examples of how Mr K took advantage of the various and sundry ways the defense's hands were tied by the judge's rulings. And yet he acted like he was almost a dunce on the witness stand. He is a sly little fox. A litigious sly little fox who has made millions of dollars suing various people - it seems to be his go-to move when he has any kind of disagreement with anyone. A Reddit group has uncovered a shit ton of lawsuits, Jack and Beata both used the legal system to get thousands and now hundreds of millions. And when you see him on the witness stand he uses very simple language, almost sounding like a very low IQ person, he didn't understand anything about his daughter's medical "stuff", denied knowing about any medication she ever was given, acted like a whiny little victim, but couldn't even muster a tear, just his whiny voice. And the jury bought his schtick lock, stock, and barrel. And he's likely going to be laughing all the way to the bank when it's all over. I am hoping the defense is able to get this farcical judgement overturned, but I don't have a great deal of confidence in the system in this particular case.
I joined the Patreon at the free level for the Nobody Should Believe me Podcast, and there are additional episodes available for members, even at the free level. Since I don't know how many of you have Patreon or are interested in going there, I will link to the web page for the podcast and there is an Episode called "What Jack Knew" that contains some of the new deposition material I had not known about from Beata's brother, Piotr. I am linking the latest three episodes from the web page, but I believe these are shortened versions of the episodes that I listened to on Patreon, so, if they don't contain some of the stuff I will mention below, it's probably because these are the "non member" version of the episodes". You can join her Patreon at the free level and get longer versions though.
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/what-jack-knew/
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/w ... -to-beata/
https://www.nobodyshouldbelieveme.com/k ... n-shapiro/
Here is a synopsis of the main suppressed evidence that I learned from depositions in the case
1. According to Beata's brother's sworn deposition, one time when he visited his sister he was home all day with Jack and Kyle. Maya was in the hospital by this time. Kyle was playing with Piotr all day long, laughing, swimming, having a good time, absolutely nothing wrong with him. When Beata came home from work Kyle immediately ran to her crying that he was in "severe all over body pain" and he wanted to be taken "for treatment". I was fucking blown away when I heard this. This is exactly the same thing that Jack had told the detective about Maya - playing joyfully all day long and as soon as Beata came home she would cry and claim to be in severe pain. (All of this evidence was suppressed by the judge, the jury had no idea of this. In fact, the jury had no idea of any of the evidence that would have very easily resulted in a complete vindication of the hospital. IMO they had enough to seriously question things, but they would have had to really work through the evidence in a way that the defense was not allowed (by judge's order) to frame it during their closing argument.) I hope this is contained on the versions that I linked above. If not, please let me know and I will try to link the free Patreon version for you if you want to hear it for yourself. Piotr accompanied Beata when she took Kyle to some hospital two hours away for "pain treatment" but doctors could not identify any source of pain in Kyle and the notation on his discharge papers indicated that he did not have any of the normal signs of having pain, such as elevated pulse rate, elevated blood pressure, his demeanor did not match what is normally seen when a person is experiencing pain, and apparently they refused to give him pain medication that Beata was demanding.
2. I already mentioned this above -- Piotr said that Beata had told him over the phone that Jack had served her with divorce papers. He was in Chicago when she called to tell him about this. After they hung up he said he called Jack to ask him "why have you served my sister with divorce papers?" and he stated that Jack just hung up on him. He also said that even though he visited the family several times during that last month prior to Beata's suicide that Jack would not have any conversation with him and the night he showed up at the house (Beata was apparently already dead in the garage and nobody knew about it), that since Beata didn't answer her phone he dialed Jack's number over and over and over again to let him know he was on his way and Jack would not pick up.
The information about Jack actually serving Beata with divorce papers really bothers me given how much money the jury awarded Jack for what essentially amounts to his wife's companionship. There was one week of testimony that the plaintiff put on that dealt with all the money the jury should give this family. During Jack's testimony he whined about how now he rolls over in bed and tries to throw his arm over his wife and she is not there. He couldn't muster any tears over that, and now I understand why. I knew they were not sleeping in the same room for the last month or two of her life, but I had not known he had taken things all the way to actually serving her with the divorce papers.
I am curious as to why the defense was not allowed to put in the evidence about the divorce since Jack seems to have "opened the door" by this kind of testimony. Or maybe I don't fully understand the concept of "opening the door", or maybe it doesn't apply in a civil case? Either way it just stuns me the amount of lies that judge KNEW Jack was telling on the witness stand and his testimony stood for the jury to consider it as fact. This is just one of a multitude of examples of how Mr K took advantage of the various and sundry ways the defense's hands were tied by the judge's rulings. And yet he acted like he was almost a dunce on the witness stand. He is a sly little fox. A litigious sly little fox who has made millions of dollars suing various people - it seems to be his go-to move when he has any kind of disagreement with anyone. A Reddit group has uncovered a shit ton of lawsuits, Jack and Beata both used the legal system to get thousands and now hundreds of millions. And when you see him on the witness stand he uses very simple language, almost sounding like a very low IQ person, he didn't understand anything about his daughter's medical "stuff", denied knowing about any medication she ever was given, acted like a whiny little victim, but couldn't even muster a tear, just his whiny voice. And the jury bought his schtick lock, stock, and barrel. And he's likely going to be laughing all the way to the bank when it's all over. I am hoping the defense is able to get this farcical judgement overturned, but I don't have a great deal of confidence in the system in this particular case.