My understanding is that normally this meeting is a) in person, b) without a lawyer, and c) ya gotta pee in the cup for drug testing. I'm sure this is the only special dispensation he will be receiving though. https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1799871851641946595
Katie Phang @KatiePhang wrote:
ICYMI: Donald Trump’s pre-sentence investigation (PSI) interview will take place tomorrow (Monday) via Zoom.
For the interview, Trump will be located at his Florida home at Mar-a-Lago with his criminal defense attorney, Todd Blanche, at his side.
Cheseborough, Ellis - no idea, but can you pardon someone who pleads out?
I think Bannon got a pardon for the Build the Wall scam. But he and Navarro def have convictions for failure to respond to a subpoena.
Jared's dad - no idea. He completed his sentence a good while back. But I don't know if having served his time would put him the category of a convicted felon that trump can't associate with; I expect it would. Makes family dinners at Javanka's pretty awkward.
Cheseborough
Ellis
They pleaded guilty so I guess that makes them convicted felons?
Once you hit those first five and I noticed a A-B-C-D-E match, I thought "I wonder if between all the others including the J6ers, we could spell out the entire alphabet with convicted felons in FJT's orbit."
Corrupt Soros backed Manhattan D.A, Alvin Bragg, at the direction of Crooked Joe Biden and his DOJ, has always known that there was NO CRIME in the Case he filed against me. He didn’t even want to bring this “Zombie Case,” but when forced to attack me for Election Interference purposes, Bragg attempted to make it look as bad as possible by “stacking the counts” - A TOTAL SCAM. The reality is that the whole Hoax is just about Legal Expenses being paid and marked as….Legal Expenses. Instead, the Prosecutors made up 34 counts out of 11 Checks, 11 Invoices, and 12 Entries by a highly respected bookkeeper in a Ledger. Even the Invoices said, “Legal Retainer.” Why? Because that’s what it was, a payment to a then-fully accredited lawyer. Nothing illegal, no “conspiracies.” THE APPELLATE COURTS HAVE TO END THIS WITCH HUNT AGAINST A POLITICAL OPPONENT!
Can't wait for sentencing and lack of remorse comes up...
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 12:46 pm
Dear Donald, if it was all "legal", how come that your attorney / attorneys did not come up with a good defense
Right?
and "highly respected bookkeeper" - respected by whom, exactly?
If you have to keep bragging about how "good" your people are, I'm thinking they really aren't very good.
