Fogbow

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

Oh man, ninja'd by the June bug TWICE IN ONE MORNING.

I shall go stand in the corner.

'Course, if'n you are a criminal, you hopefully just learned an important lesson: Don't use facial recognition to unlock your phone.

Lemme write that down somewhere ...

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am

Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.

That's interesting. I wonder what they did?

Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

The wonders of face recognition

Now for me, mafia style chop off your fingers to unlock by finger print So when the FBI knocks on your door, rush to the kitchen stove and scortch your finger tips

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am

Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.

That's interesting. I wonder what they did?

Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

Great. All I have to do is brush my hair a different way and my iphone says "Who dafuq are you?"

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:29 am
Great. All I have to do is brush my hair a different way and my iphone says "Who dafuq are you?"

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am

Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.

That's interesting. I wonder what they did?

Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

Saw something from the ACLU a while back. Seems that cops unlocking your phone via fingerprint or facial recognition isn’t protected, but using a passcode is, they can’t demand that you tell them the code.

I picked the right week to stop criming.

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am

Eastman contends the agents "forced" him to unlock his phone.

That's interesting. I wonder what they did?

Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

That would do it.

Steve Bannon is still seeking to get Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Jan 6 Committee members to testify at his trial next month

Bannon argues in new filing: The Members of Congress are "not too important" to appear ===>

Don't be surprised to hear about Georgia at today's Jan 6 Select Committee hearing

Looking through excerpts of the committee's deposition with Cassidy Hutchinson, they asked her about Mark Meadows post-election day travels to Georgia

==>

I'm getting fired up for today's hearing

Any links for those in the rebel continent of Socialismstan to see it?

Sounds like what we're going to hear today is that they started planning all of this back in September 2020; before the election even took place when the polls showed that trump was going to lose. From the guardian article that's attached:

On the night of the first presidential debate, Trump’s top former strategist Steve Bannon said in an interview with The Circus on Showtime that the outcome of the election would be decided at the state level and eventually at the congressional certification on January 6.

“They’re going to try and overturn this election with uncertified votes,” Bannon said. Asked how he expects the election to end, Bannon said: “Right before noon on the 20th, in a vote in the House, Trump will win the presidency.”

I thought this was very interesting…

Open. Open. Open.

Greatgrey wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:57 am

June bug wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:42 am

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:03 am
That's interesting. I wonder what they did?

Don’t know what her source was, but last night Rachel said they held the phone up to his face to unlock it.

Saw something from the ACLU a while back. Seems that cops unlocking your phone via fingerprint or facial recognition isn’t protected, but using a passcode is, they can’t demand that you tell them the code.

I recall something about that as well, but it is irrelevant in this case, as the search warrant clearly specified that Eastman was required to unlock all devices, including any biometric locks.

FIRST MAJOR NEWS OF THE HEARING: Rudy Giuliani told Hutchinson on Jan. 2 that Trump would be going to the Capitol on Jan. 6. She asked Meadows about this and he told her that "things might get real, real bad on Jan. 6."

Security spotted the stalk of an AR15 outside the ellipse on Jan 6. Also, "glock-style weapons in their waistbands."

"elevated threat in a tree outside Constitution Avenue...." (with photo)


"Walking down the street with AR-15s at 14th and Independence"

Sounds touristy.

Meadow's response to learning people were armed at the Capitol on Jan 6

"Mark not looking up from his notes (?) ....Mark did you hear him?....Then Mark chimed in, allright, anything else?"

Tony Ornato and Cassidy H looked at each other.

MM, "Have you talked to the President?" Tony said yes he had." and that was it.

I thought concealed carry was okayed by the Supremes.

texts to Tony O - "He" was trump and he was pissed that the crowd at the ellipse wasn't big enough. Wanted more ppl brought in.

She attended the rally via presidential motorcade. Behind the stage, trump was very concerned about the "shot" bc the space wasn't full of ppl. "He wanted it to be full..." "He felt ??? was at fault for not letting everyone in." He wanted people with weapons allowed in?? Did I hear that right?

trump "I don't care if they have weapons. They're here to see me. They aren't going to hurt me. Take the fucking mags* away."

They're not here to hurt me.
manometers.

"They're having trouble stacking bodies" meaning SS was becoming aware security at the Capitol. would not be adequate.

after talking to Ornato, she went to talk to Meadows. She tried to warn Meadows by opening the car door, but he slammed it shut before she could speak to him. He was on the phone.

it happened a 2nd time.

It was 20-25 minutes before she could talk to him.

when CH was finally able to tell Meadows, "he almost had a lack of reaction. He asked, How much longer does the prez have left in his speech?"

Many discussions about the rhetoric of the jan 6 speech, "it would be foolish to include the language the prez requested, fight for trump, fight for me, fight for the movement, things about the vp at the time, too. Herschman and ??? urged speech writers not to include those things for legal concerns..."

talking about trump's plan to walk to the Capitol. He planned to travel to the Capitol on Jan 6.

talking about Off The Record movements, which are not scheduled. You can pull that together in less than an hour to circumvent releasing it to the press, or not have as many security parameters put in place.

back to trump's plan. Cipollone sp? was concerned about trump wanting to go to the Capitol and agreed with the SS trump should not go.

"We need to make sure this doesn't happen...We have serious legal concerns if he goes to the Capitol that day." Keep relaying that to Meadows as he believed Meadows was pushing for the trip.

Cipollone said "please make sure we don't go up to the Capitol. Keep in touch wiht me. We will get charged with every crime imaginable if that happens."

what crimes? obstructing justice, defrauding the electoral count.