Fogbow

One wonders when the legacy media will quit allowing themselves to be played by false innuendo based on selective leaks from the January 6 Committee. Yesterday, the Washington Post ran with a story that I’d had email communication with Ginni Thomas back in early December 2020. Others have tried to tie that to a statement I reportedly made in an email some weeks later, in which I reportedly stated that “I understand that there is a heated fight underway” at the Supreme Court over whether the Court should take the various election cases that were pending on its docket. Recall that the story about a heated fight at the Court over the election cases was the subject of news accounts at the time. See, e.g., Neil Campbell, Rumors Chief Justice Roberts Shouted Down His Peers Over Texas Case Emerge During Electoral College Vote, Vision Times (Dec. 20, 2020), at https://www.visiontimes.com/2020/12/20/ ... -vote.html. Whether or not those news accounts were true, I can categorically confirm that at no time did I discuss with Mrs. Thomas or Justice Thomas any matters pending or likely to come before the Court. We have never engaged in such discussions, would not engage in such discussions, and did not do so in December 2020 or anytime else. As for the email communications I had with Mrs. Thomas? As you can see for yourselves, she invited me to give an update about election litigation to a group she met with periodically. Those from the January 6 committee who leaked a false impression about that email should be ashamed of themselves, but the Post should be embarrassed for running a story based on their false innuendo.

sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:43 pm I wondered if this might be an explanation for Judge Luttig's speech pattern.

HawaiiDelilah™ votes DEMOCRATIC BLUE @HawaiiDelilah wrote: DOJ officially requests transcripts from Jan 6 Committee. Letter reads:"It is now readily apparent that the interviews the select committee conducted are not just potentially relevant to our overall criminal investigations, but are likely relevant to specific prosecutions."

Sarah Reese Jones @PoliticusSarah wrote: Bennie Thompson rejects the DOJ pressure for the 1/6 Committee transcripts, "We are not going to stop what we are doing to share the information that we have gotten so far with the Department of Justice. We have to do our work."

neonzx wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:07 pm The DOJ can wait their turn.

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 3:27 pm compares Pence to someone in the bible, book of Daniel, about being ordered by the king to do something that's wrong. I don't know the story. Maybe someone can fill us in? Apparently Jacob is religious and had a bible with him and went to that chapter in Daniel as they waited in the tunnels.

AndyinPA wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:48 pm

sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:43 pm I wondered if this might be an explanation for Judge Luttig's speech pattern.

That occurred to me, too.

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:18 pm Hannity is becoming a bad word in some RWNJ circles, I’ve noticed in the last couple days.

Also, tfg demands to be heard! He must really not like what is going on today.
7914CD71-A1CF-420D-90CA-BBF1ECCFB1E5.png

dan1100 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:00 am Bold prediction.

The Select Committee already has the deposition of someone who was on the tour or who helped set it up.

Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:54 pm The pressure on Pence must have been crushing, and spread out over many weeks. The OSG doesn't mess around when he wants something. This makes Pence’s resistance more admirable, IMHO.

Also, too, we should thank God. You just know that Pence spent hours in prayer over this. Apparently, God never once told him it sounded like a good idea.