Re: GIL: Klayman
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2021 5:07 pm
That's not the back room at a Denny's, so it's an unofficial gathering, thus mute.
That's not the back room at a Denny's, so it's an unofficial gathering, thus mute.
So this was the big deal "constitution-y" thing Arpaio was advertising he was attending?
PS: This www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyd9XZrTBkM video is the "master" video on the channel (the featured video on the page), so don't comment there or it will really mess him up.Wolfgang Tack 39 minutes ago
Howard, why don't you tell us more about the "Grossly Inappropriate " things Larry Klayman has done?
I heard that he touched his then very young daughter in a "Grossly Inappropriate " way and that you can read this in a decision by a court.
Well, the Google is my friend. A search for "Larry Klayman touched his daughter " brings everything to the light of day.
What a slimebag.
Howard Appel Howard Appel 2 hours ago
What a farce. Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman puts on another play acting "Citizen's Grand Jury," which is nothing of the sort. His "Grand Jury" has no legal effect or authority and any "indictment" it issues, along with $10, will buy you a large cup of coffee at Starbucks. It will result in no arrests, no trials, no convictions --- it will result in NOTHING. Just like all of his previous "Grand Juries." No indictments by real grand juries, no subpoenas, no investigations, no arrests, no trials, no convictions. His "Grand Juries" have no authority to subpoena anyone, to conduct any investigations, and these "Grand Juries," just as with Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman, are jokes.
What are the criteria to be chosen as one of his "Grand Jurors?" Do you have to agree with him politically or if you don't you are automatically excluded? Is his "Grand Jury" a cross-selection of the population or just a group of like-minded cultists that he selects? And how do we know that Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman actually gets people to participate and that he is not just making this all up?
Now, you may ask, why do I call him "Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman?" That is because it is how an actual judge, in an actual trial, in the judge's written opinion, described Larry's behavior with his then minor children, as "grossly inappropriate."
And while Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman complains about Dr. Fauci's, and other's, professional behavior, let us ask Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman how many times he has been sanctioned by state bars, state courts and federal courts for, among other things, failing to comply with his professional obligations.
And Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman likes to brag about how he served in the Department of Justice and was involved in very important anti-trust cases. Let us ask him how many times he appeared in Court, whether at trial or for a hearing while working at the DOJ -- I suspect the number is less than 1. Or how many times his name appeared as a signing attorney on a court filing while he was so important at the DOJ or how many depositions he took or defended while at the DOJ. Again, I suspect the numbers are very very very small, maybe even less than 1.
Oh, and by the way, how much do you owe in unpaid judgements in cases where you were personally sued and lost? Just asking.
Lastly, I just convened and held an "Extraordinary Citizens' Grand Jury," which, much to my surprise and astonishment, indicted Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman on the following charges:
First Charge: Conspiring to invent, craft, distribute, spread and aid and abet the invention, crafting, distribution and spread of conspiracies with the goal of harming those who disagree, and/or would disagree, with Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman;
Second Charge: Conspiring and aiding and abetting others to willfully spread false and malicious rumors about prominent political figures with the goal of harming such figures reputations and ability to achieve their own goals;
Third Charge: Bringing shame and disrepute upon the legal profession;
Fourth Charge: Deliberately allowing himself to be photographed / photoshopped in silly and asinine outfits;
Fifth Charge: Pretending to have a conscience;
Sixth Charge: Pretending that his "Grand Juries" are anything other than an attempt to grift the rubes, to fleece the sheep and to take money from the gullible; and
Seventh Charge: Just Because.
SO SAY WE ALL.
Kudos to Mr. Tack, as sharp as one. Well done.orlylicious wrote: ↑Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:59 pm The video (which you can get to without the http) says THREE comments, but only TWO show up. Can YouTube comments be deleted? There must be a tech error because GIL surely wouldn't do that as such a vigorous supporter of free speech, right?
PS: This www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyd9XZrTBkM video is the "master" video on the channel (the featured video on the page), so don't comment there or it will really mess him up.Wolfgang Tack 39 minutes ago
Howard, why don't you tell us more about the "Grossly Inappropriate " things Larry Klayman has done?
I heard that he touched his then very young daughter in a "Grossly Inappropriate " way and that you can read this in a decision by a court.
Well, the Google is my friend. A search for "Larry Klayman touched his daughter " brings everything to the light of day.
What a slimebag.
Howard Appel Howard Appel 2 hours ago
What a farce. Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman puts on another play acting "Citizen's Grand Jury," which is nothing of the sort. His "Grand Jury" has no legal effect or authority and any "indictment" it issues, along with $10, will buy you a large cup of coffee at Starbucks. It will result in no arrests, no trials, no convictions --- it will result in NOTHING. Just like all of his previous "Grand Juries." No indictments by real grand juries, no subpoenas, no investigations, no arrests, no trials, no convictions. His "Grand Juries" have no authority to subpoena anyone, to conduct any investigations, and these "Grand Juries," just as with Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman, are jokes.
What are the criteria to be chosen as one of his "Grand Jurors?" Do you have to agree with him politically or if you don't you are automatically excluded? Is his "Grand Jury" a cross-selection of the population or just a group of like-minded cultists that he selects? And how do we know that Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman actually gets people to participate and that he is not just making this all up?
Now, you may ask, why do I call him "Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman?" That is because it is how an actual judge, in an actual trial, in the judge's written opinion, described Larry's behavior with his then minor children, as "grossly inappropriate."
And while Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman complains about Dr. Fauci's, and other's, professional behavior, let us ask Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman how many times he has been sanctioned by state bars, state courts and federal courts for, among other things, failing to comply with his professional obligations.
And Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman likes to brag about how he served in the Department of Justice and was involved in very important anti-trust cases. Let us ask him how many times he appeared in Court, whether at trial or for a hearing while working at the DOJ -- I suspect the number is less than 1. Or how many times his name appeared as a signing attorney on a court filing while he was so important at the DOJ or how many depositions he took or defended while at the DOJ. Again, I suspect the numbers are very very very small, maybe even less than 1.
Oh, and by the way, how much do you owe in unpaid judgements in cases where you were personally sued and lost? Just asking.
Lastly, I just convened and held an "Extraordinary Citizens' Grand Jury," which, much to my surprise and astonishment, indicted Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman on the following charges:
First Charge: Conspiring to invent, craft, distribute, spread and aid and abet the invention, crafting, distribution and spread of conspiracies with the goal of harming those who disagree, and/or would disagree, with Grossly Inappropriate Larry Klayman;
Second Charge: Conspiring and aiding and abetting others to willfully spread false and malicious rumors about prominent political figures with the goal of harming such figures reputations and ability to achieve their own goals;
Third Charge: Bringing shame and disrepute upon the legal profession;
Fourth Charge: Deliberately allowing himself to be photographed / photoshopped in silly and asinine outfits;
Fifth Charge: Pretending to have a conscience;
Sixth Charge: Pretending that his "Grand Juries" are anything other than an attempt to grift the rubes, to fleece the sheep and to take money from the gullible; and
Seventh Charge: Just Because.
SO SAY WE ALL.![]()
Even for GIL, that's a notable own-goal.In responding to the undisputed facts proffered in Defendants’ Rule 56.1 statement, Plaintiffs repeatedly deny facts without citation to admissible evidence to controvert as required by Local Civil Rule 56.1(d). For instance, Plaintiffs deny Defendants’ relatively innocuous factual proffer of Cohen’s career as “a comedian and political satirist,” Defs. Rule 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 11, by unhelpfully stating only that “Cohen is simply a fraudster,” Pls. Counter-Rule 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 11, even though their Complaint alleges Cohen to be “an actor, comedian, screenwriter, and producer,” Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 10. Courts routinely deem admitted those facts “not contradicted by citations to admissible evidence.” * * *The Court therefore disregards Plaintiffs’ denials that lack citation to evidence, see * * *, and has conducted its own independent review of the record supplied in connection with Defendants’ motion to ensure that any facts relied upon in this Opinion and Order have adequate support.
Massaquoi and Anderson were both part of the California Delegation for Klayman's Third Continental Congress. (Klayman "represented" Florida, natch.) But the "delegate" list is a fairly decent collection of right-wing grifters.Hollywood Actor Brings Class Action SuitHollywood actor, Siaka Massaquoi,** a conservative black activist as well as entertainer, will file suit on July 15, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, over an illegal unconstitutional raid by the FBI and its agents, as ordered by and at the direction of FBI Director Christopher Wray, as part and parcel to the bureau's post January 6, 2021, round up of even peaceful protestors who were in Washington, D.C., in support of President Trump and a nation free from rank government corruption.Press Conference @ 2 P.M. Pacific
Date: July 15, 2021
Place: 225 N. Canon Drive*
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
The complaint, which is being filed as a class action for all persons who were in the nation's capital to peacefully protest, but who in the aftermath of January 6, 2021, have been rounded up, had their homes and businesses violated and broken into, their property such as cell phones and computers seized without probable cause, arrested, prosecuted, denied bail, or some even thrown into solitary confinement while awaiting trial, alleges the violation of First, Fifth, and Fourteenth constitutional rights by the defendants.
Larry Klayman, the chairman and general counsel of Freedom Watch, which represents Mr. Massaquoi, had this to say:The lead plaintiff, Mr. Massaquoi, was not arrested, and he never entered in the Capitol Building, but he had his home broken into at 5:45 am.*** He and his family and friends were handcuffed in front of children, denied right of counsel, and illegally questioned. To make matters worse, his cell phone and computers were seized, preventing him from carrying out his trade and profession and well as personal matters. The defendants have refused to return his property.The FBI, as alleged, is being used by the Biden-Harris Justice Department as the administration's and the left's 'personal Gestapo,' to stifle free speech and dissent over the near total leftist, socialist and borderline communist takeover of our body politic. And, FBI Director Wray bears personal legal responsibility and liability for these unconstitutional acts, which he has bragged about in public testimony before Congress — branding the peaceful protestors as mostly white domestic terrorists -- in order to save his job with President Biden after he was blamed for not being prepared for and warning Congress and the incoming Biden administration over the so called 'capitol riot.'
Mr. Massaquoi will be present at the press conference and will speak to the unconstitutional and illegal "Gestapo tactics" of the Defendants, for which they must be held to legally account. Mr. Klayman, a former U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor during the Reagan administration, will also speak.
For more information contact Asher Anderson, the executive assistant at Freedom Watch...
So, basically, the feebs got a warrant to search his devices to see with whom he was communicating.FBI agents last week raided the North Hollywood home of an actor seen in social media videos inside the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6.
Laura Eimiller, a spokeswoman for the FBI, confirmed that agents searched the home of Siaka Massaquoi in the early morning hours of Thursday, June 10. She said no one was arrested.
Why the FBI raided Massaquoi’s home was unclear Sunday — a search warrant filed in advance of the raid was under seal, and the agency declined to comment about the investigation.
* * *
Massaquoi can be seen in a video posted the day of the Capitol attack by Tim Gionet, a far-right activist arrested after he was seen lounging in Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s office. The video shows Massaquoi just inside a door to the Capitol with his phone out, recording the crowd of rioters facing off with a line of police in riot gear.
In Thursday’s Instagram video, Burks said he did not go to the Capitol. He said FBI officials during the raid told him and Massaquoi that they were investigating them for associating with members of a social media group.
* * *
Massaquoi has appeared in bit parts on television shows like “Ratched,” “NCIS: Los Angeles,” and “S.W.A.T.”
His Instagram account shows he took part in an anti-vaccine rally near the entrance to the COVID-19 vaccination site at Dodgers Stadium in Chavez Ravine on Jan. 30. The protest led the Los Angeles Fire Department to briefly close the gates at the stadium entrance, but LAPD Chief Michel Moore said no one waiting in line was delayed for their vaccination appointments.
Massaquoi also appeared at a protest in support of Tinhorn Flats Saloon & Grill, a bar that refused to shut down at the time of an L.A. County-wide lockdown in December during a COVID-19 surge, leading to a back-and-forth legal feud between the bar owners and the city of Burbank.
See: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... J_jdGHWNgMLarry Klayman, an attorney for Moore, said Cronan’s decision was “predicted” and alleged the judge was “biased and prejudiced” against Moore because of his conservative politics and religious beliefs.
It's a Trump appointee and a member of the Federalist Society....alleged the judge was “biased and prejudiced” against Moore because of his conservative politics and religious beliefs.
https://www.queerty.com/ratched-actor-p ... s-20210616“Ratched” actor who participated in Capitol riots is selling t-shirts to cover his legal expenses
By Graham Gremore June 16, 2021 at 11:06am · 18 comments
A Netflix actor is peddling t-shirts on Instagram to purportedly raise money so he can sue his local newspaper for reporting about his involvement in January’s failed MAGA coup. FBI agents raided the North Hollywood home of actor Siaka Massaquoi last week after he was seen in videos taken inside the U.S. Capitol building during the January 6 insurrection. Massaquoi most recently appeared in two episodes of Ryan Murphy‘s super queer Netflix series Ratched, playing a priest named Father Adeyemi. His other credits include TV shows like NCIS, Lethal Weapon, and S.W.A.T., plus several appearances in short films. Exactly why the FBI raided his home is unclear, though FBI spokesperson Laura Eimiller confirmed a search warrant was filed in advance and said that, ultimately, no one was arrested. Here’s a video Massaquoi shot shortly after he allegedly stormed the Capitol.
“We had the right to walk into the Capitol because it’s ours,” he says in the video. “That’s our Capitol. That’s not the politicians’ Capitol. It’s ours.”
After the raid, Massaquoi posted a video to Instagram saying he “did nothing wrong on the 6th” and accused law enforcement of trying to “paint something as wrong” when he “did nothing violent.” Since then, he’s been begging people to send him donations on Venmo so he can “sue the sh*t out” of the Los Angeles Times for reporting on his story. He’s also selling t-shirts in an effort to raise additional funds. According to the Los Angeles Daily News, Massaquoi took part in an anti-vaccine rally in L.A. back in January and joined a protest in support of a sports bar that refused to close during a countywide lockdown last December. The paper says it reached out to him for comment several times, but that he never responded, and when they called his cellphone number, a woman hung up on them. For a guy who wants to sue his local newspaper for what he feels is unfair reporting on him, you’d think Massaquoi would take reporters up on their offer to share his side of the story.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-the- ... ccine-siteMeet the Bizarro Crew That Shut Down a Los Angeles Vaccine Site
***
Actor Siaka Massaquoi, who did not return a request for comment, also filmed himself outside the Capitol (which he does not appear to have entered) and at the Dodger Stadium rally. “Great time protesting sheep running to get a vaccine you don’t need!!” he wrote on Instagram. “So much the authorities closed the entrance cause there were scared we would ‘storm.’”
Brilliant headline by the Post. What's the joke? The program that was the subject of the suit (which is what the judge was actually referring to in the quote)? The lawsuit? Or Roy Moore himself?curmudgeon wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 12:07 am Our boy Klayman falls to Sacha Baron Coleman
Judge tosses Roy Moore’s $95 million defamation suit against Sacha Baron Cohen: ‘Clearly a joke’See: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... J_jdGHWNgMLarry Klayman, an attorney for Moore, said Cronan’s decision was “predicted” and alleged the judge was “biased and prejudiced” against Moore because of his conservative politics and religious beliefs.