in case you wish to refresh your memory, the year is 2008
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:33 am
by RTH10260
No-Nonesense Judge Orders JAIL For Smug "Sovereign Citizen" | Contempt of Court
Court Nerds
2 Feb 2024
Entitled responsibility-shirking, sovereign citizen fail in court! She doesn't even realize she is arrested and jailed for non-payment of court ordered fees!! Strap in for a court drama unlike any you've seen before! This isn't your typical "Judge Judy" episode; this is what happens when legal expertise clashes with... divine guidance? Bold individual goes head-to-head against a seasoned lawyer in a courtroom showdown that will have you questioning if you're watching a legal proceeding or a reality show pilot.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:10 pm
by GlimDropper
Judge gives sovcit a master class in running a court room. The good stuff starts about a minute 39 in.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 10:39 am
by RTH10260
Seen this lawyer looking at sovcits in front of judges for the first time. Got permanently stuck to his channel.
Also too, Robbie Estabrook might be the most annoying sovcit ever.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 4:51 pm
by Uninformed
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 1:41 pm
by Rolodex
What a suck of resources these people are.
After nine months, the city of Sedona’s lawsuit against six residents who filed what the city described as ‘bogus liens” against the sitting members of the Sedona City Council and three city staffers has almost reached its conclusion. The city has settled with three of the defendants, anticipates a fourth settlement within the next few weeks and has moved for default judgment against the two remaining defendants.
The city’s complaint stated that on June 3, 2022, Shelley Evans filed a “notice of distress of bond” with the Coconino County Recorder’s office on behalf of herself, Donna Joy Varney, Charles and Alissa Tyler, Gayle Baingo and Theresa Vos, demanding that the named officials pay them $11.2 million on the grounds of 141 alleged violations of the U.S. Constitution. Evans filed a second notice on July 15 demanding an additional $1.11 million from Magistrate Judge Paul Schlegel and code enforcement officer Brian Armstrong.
Cops should ask SovCits: since they're not contracting with the Government, doesn't that mean they can't vote?
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:27 pm
by RTH10260
I am constantly astonished to see sovcits turning up to court when they claim the court has no jurisdiction over them and they do not recognize any "contracts" that would connect them to said court.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:35 pm
by Frater I*I
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:27 pm
I am constantly astonished to see sovcits turning up to court when they claim the court has no jurisdiction over them and they do not recognize any "contracts" that would connect them to said court.
Because they fear jail time more than the court, and know most likely they'll get a slap on the wrist....
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 7:07 am
by Suranis
Also they generally are drawn by the thought of "DESTROYing" the judge, and seeing the entire legal system grovelling at their feet.
That's generally why they put their failures on youtube - they want to show off how they did in their legalese battle.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 7:36 am
by Resume18
Yeah, here's a fine example of a sov-cit "owning" a judge.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:01 am
by John Thomas8
Normal behaviour of yootoober frauditors (there's no reason that YT should be monetizing this type of content):
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:59 am
by Resume18
John Thomas8 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:01 am
Normal behaviour of yootoober frauditors (there's no reason that YT should be monetizing this type of content):
"We're not stupid," claims the misogynist guttersnipe.
Oh I beg to differ . . .
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:09 pm
by RTH10260
John Thomas8 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:01 am
Normal behaviour of yootoober frauditors (there's no reason that YT should be monetizing this type of content):
Didn't view the full video, so just this one comment: I do not know of any 1AA who dox government employees, eg their private information. What regularily gets published is their work information. My guess is that some commenter may have posted private information. As with all larger channels the owner does not have the chance to review each and every comment and totally moderate what happens there. I have heard, more as a rumour than an actual case, that law enforcement are trying to take Youtubers to court on things that are posted in comments. I also have heard rumours that LEOs or someone near to them has intentionally posted damaging information so that LEOs may try and use it against the channel owner.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:33 pm
by bob
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:09 pmation. What regularly gets published is their work information.
So: Stochastic terrorism.
"John Q. Public, the senior mail clerk in the Bundog County's Assessor's Office, located on Mockingbird Lane, is a real jerk." ("Shame if something happened to him.")
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:54 pm
by jemcanada2
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:27 pm
I am constantly astonished to see sovcits turning up to court when they claim the court has no jurisdiction over them and they do not recognize any "contracts" that would connect them to said court.
A lot of them stand at “the bar” because they refuse to board the vessel because admiralty law and other argle bargle.
RTH10260 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:09 pmation. What regularly gets published is their work information.
So: Stochastic terrorism.
"John Q. Public, the senior mail clerk in the Bundog County's Assessor's Office, located on Mockingbird Lane, is a real jerk." ("Shame if something happened to him.")
Exactly. Pieces of garbage like the misogynist in that video know exactly what their idiotic viewership will get up to.
John Thomas8 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:01 am
Normal behaviour of yootoober frauditors (there's no reason that YT should be monetizing this type of content):
Didn't view the full video, so just this one comment: I do not know of any 1AA who dox government employees, eg their private information. What regularily gets published is their work information. My guess is that some commenter may have posted private information. As with all larger channels the owner does not have the chance to review each and every comment and totally moderate what happens there. I have heard, more as a rumour than an actual case, that law enforcement are trying to take Youtubers to court on things that are posted in comments. I also have heard rumours that LEOs or someone near to them has intentionally posted damaging information so that LEOs may try and use it against the channel owner.
YouTube/Insta/Tiktok frauditors do consistently dox the people they harass. They lie, make up things about their victims and grift at a rate that impresses the trump clan.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 6:12 pm
by John Thomas8
Here's a precious one (he is in the last video I posted, the one arrested on a missyshitty warrant). Very safe, no record of DV or stalking at all, right?
Such a sweetheart frauditor:
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:59 pm
by sugar magnolia
John Thomas8 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 6:12 pm
Here's a precious one (he is in the last video I posted, the one arrested on a missyshitty warrant). Very safe, no record of DV or stalking at all, right?
John Thomas8 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 6:12 pm
Here's a precious one (he is in the last video I posted, the one arrested on a missyshitty warrant). Very safe, no record of DV or stalking at all, right?
Such a sweetheart frauditor:
Missyshitty? Really?
Personal bias, my NPD ex-daughter is there. It'll remain that.
Sovcit nutz
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:14 am
by jemcanada2
Robbie Esterbrook’s arrest at the airport and the subsequent trial remain one of the most painful sovcit cases ever. It’s especially annoying if you watch the trial with commentary by Marc Stevens, his guru for all things sovcit.
